Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数

According to Cromwell, Bosovich ”... lined up another contract with another mill to take the remaining amount of trees from that land". ...

Well, I met with him and he suggested that it, that this was possible and — His Honour: Q. ...

In this instance the subdivision involved ”... removing /2 of the subject property from the building to facilitate the sale of the building at a reasonable market value. ...

Smelting & Refining Company Limited, [1954] S.C.R. 58, [1954] C.T.C. 28; 54 D.T.C. 1011; 5. ...

The evaluation formula was set out in Schedule “A” of the defence as follows: Corporation's Equity in the residence $316,135.79 Return on investment of $316,135.79 at 9% $28,452.00 Mortgage interest, municipal taxes and insurance paid by the corporation 8,799.00 Gross Benefit to Plaintiff and wife received from corporation 37,251.00 Less: Amount of benefit attributable to Plaintiff’s wife 18,625.00 Amount of benefit attributable to Plaintiff 18,625.00 Less: Rent and expenses paid by Plaintiff 12,100.00 Net amount of benefit to the Plaintiff $ 6,526.00 The final assumption was that the corporation did not build the residence for the purpose of producing or gaining income from a business or property. ...

I can’t say how I arrived at $10,000 — it is just an amount which I considered to be a nominal reasonable value at the time. ...

There, a statutory tribunal had to construe the word “night” in a context which read: “... he is so severely disabled physically or mentally that he requires from another person, in connection with his bodily functions, frequent attention throughout the day and prolonged or repeated attention during the night...”. ...

There was no legal obligation upon Sparkle to make these payments in that they were the obligation of its sole shareholder — Riddell. ...

Total income for the 1980 taxation year $144,011.00 Less: QPP contributions $ 212.00 Unemployment insurance premiums 204.00 RRSP 4,500.00 RHOSP 1,000.00 Financial costs $24,474.00 IAA 27,338.00* Other deductions 51,812.00 51,812.00 57,728.00 Net income 86,283.00 Personal exemptions 3,880.00 Charitable donations 150.00 Interest deduction 1,000.00 Capital loss carried back from 1981 43,511.00 48,541.00 Taxable income $37,742.00 *Point at issue Having regard to the deduction in respect of taxable dividends under s 121 of the Income Tax Act, the appellant stated moreover in the said amended return that he had no tax payable for the 1980 taxation year. ...

Mr Justice Mahoney of the Federal Court — Trial Division held that the defendant was resident in Canada throughout 1972. ...