Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数

Results 2681 - 2690 of 2797 for 哈尔滨到北京 公里数
Decision summary

1068754 Alberta Ltd., trustee of DGGMC Bitton Trust v. ARQ, 2018 QCCA 8 (Quebec Court of Appeal), aff'd 2019 SCC 37 -- summary under Subsection 231.2(1)

Before dismissing DGGMC’s appeal, she stated (at paras. 51-53, Tax Interpretations translation): Here we are not concerned with a seizure outside of Quebec which, it is true, could require the seizing party to approach an authority of the foreign State with a view to obtaining its collaboration in order to proceed. ...
Decision summary

Kretztechnik AG v Finanzamt Linz, [2005] EUECJ C-465/03, [2006] BVC 66 (ECJ (1st Chamber)) -- summary under Subsection 169(1)

Thus, the right to deduct VAT charged on the acquisition of input goods or services presupposes that the expenditure incurred in acquiring them was a component of the cost of the output transactions that gave rise to the right to deduct [36] In this case, in view of the fact that, first, a share issue is an operation not falling within the scope of the [Directive] and, second, that operation was carried out by Kretztechnik in order to increase its capital for the benefit of its economic activity in general, it must be considered that the costs of the supplies acquired by that company in connection with the operation concerned form part of its overheads and are therefore, as such, component parts of the price of its products. ...
FCA (summary)

North Shore Power Group Inc. v. Canada, 2018 FCA 9 -- summary under Subsection 232(2)

She concluded (at paras 50 and 51) that as “Menova did not put funds at the disposal of North Shore when it issued the credit memos section 232 does not apply to the transactions at issue as HST was not credited to North Shore.” ...
Decision summary

6094350 Canada Inc. and Genex Communications Inc.v. Agence du revenu du Québec, 2018 QCCQ 556, aff'd in part (rev'd on statute-barring issue) sub nom.Demers v. Agence du revenu du Québec, 2020 QCCA 681 -- summary under Subsection 227.1(3)

. Mr. Demers is an experienced director. Nothing permitted him to believe that the cosmetic changes made to the structure of the Corporation sufficed to change its tax obligations and to terminate its obligations to collect and remit the source deductions for personnel. ...
FCA (summary)

Bauer v. Canada, 2018 FCA 62 -- summary under Subsection 231.2(1)

. [T]he CRA’s power to issue requirements under section 231.2 of the ITA to obtain information or documents that will be used for the administrative purpose of reassessing a taxpayer is not suspended by the commencement of an investigation. ...
Decision summary

Agence du revenu du Québec v. Stamatopoulos, 2018 QCCA 474 -- summary under Intermediary

.” [T]he judge concluded that the evidence presented by the Agency did not support the hypothesis that a business other than the subcontractors indicated in the invoices had transacted with Mr. ...
Decision summary

Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147 -- summary under Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i)

. A parent of a municipal entity is not entitled to gain an advantage over its private competitors by arranging its subsidiaries’ affairs in a way that causes a hypothetical arm’s length loan to appear riskier than it would have been had any reasonable municipal entity actually gone into the market to borrow the funds. ...
FCA (summary)

Freitas v. Canada, 2018 FCA 110 -- summary under Subsection 152(4.2)

Canada, 2018 FCA 110-- summary under Subsection 152(4.2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 152- Subsection 152(4.2) s. 152(4.2) inapplicable where reassessment, albeit in response to refund request, increased taxpayer’s liability The taxpayer retired as a partner from Deloitte & Touche LLP in 2007. ...
TCC (summary)

Landbouwbedrijf Backx B.V. v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 142, confirmed on s. 2(1) grounds, remitted for reconsideration on s. 128.1(1)(c) and Treaty grounds 2019 FCA 310 -- summary under Article 4

. However, the Appellant argues that it is a resident of the Netherlands where it is domiciled (though no expert evidence was lead on the issue of Dutch law) in which case it is possible to conclude that the Appellant “is a resident of both States”. ...

Pages