Search - 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查

. … We have consulted with the International, Large Business and Investigations Branch (formerly the Compliance Programs Branch) to determine whether an administrative position could be taken in the situation described above to aggregate certain amounts receivable for purposes of the PLOI elections penalty calculation and, if so, whether such aggregation should be made on an annual, quarterly, or monthly basis. ...

The trust: … holds property that is subject to subsection 75(2) of the Act Is such a trust is required to file a T3 return for a year regardless whether the property subject to s. 75(2) earns any income or profits, or generates a capital gain? ...

.” … [I]t could nevertheless be established that…as with Hélie Holdco, BuyCo incurred no economic risk in participating in the transaction, did not derive any benefit from the purchase of shares, had no interest other than to allow the employee/shareholder to realize a capital gain and benefit from the deduction, and had no function independent of the employee /shareholder or the operating corporation- and, in short, it only participated in the transaction as an accommodation for the benefit of the employee/shareholder. ...

. … [I]f under civil law or common law, as applicable, partner A did not obtain a loan nor become the debtor of the partnership or of partner B by reason of distributions in favour of partner A under the partnership agreement, the conditions for the application of subsection 15(2)…would not be satisfied. ...

7 October 2016 APFF Roundtable Q. 1B, 2016-0652761C6 F- T4A filing-- summary under Subsection 200(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Regulations- Regulation 200- Subsection 200(1) no expanded relief from the broad T4A reporting requirements In light of the wording of ITA s. 153(1)(g) and Reg. 200(2), there is a broad range of inappropriate circumstances where the issuance of a T4A is required – for, example, where a corporation pays an amount greater than $500 to its accountant for professional services. ...

. … Regarding the February 22, 1994 election, the CRA still considers as valid the form, Election to Report a Capital Gain on Property Owned at the End February 22, 1994, filed by a taxpayer in accordance with the instructions and information available at that time. ...

7 October 2016 APFF Roundtable Q. 2, 2016-0652841C6 F- Changement partiel d’usage- immeuble locatif et résidentiel-- summary under Principal Residence Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 54- Principal Residence triplex contained separate housing units An individual owner of the whole triplex used Unit 1 (representing 50% of the area) for direct personal use and rented out the other two units – then some years later (at the beginning of “Year 11”), started renting out Unit 1, moved into Unit 2 for direct personal use and provided Unit 3 to family members at a low rent. ...

. … Accordingly, since Mr. died before having completed the transfer of the capital property, that transfer instead was effected by his estate, which is a trust and does not comply with the requirements of subsection 73(1). ...

The CRA is, however, prepared to consider that issue as part of an advance income tax rulings request …. ...

Since subsection 7(1.3) applies for the purposes of subdivision c of Division B of Part I …, if the disposed of security is not a [s. 7(1.1)] deferred security, subsection 47(1) applies to determine the ACB subject to any applicable adjustments pursuant to paragraph 53(1)(j). ...