Search - 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查

In rejecting the submission, and finding that the amounts were deductible to the taxpayer, Archambault, J. stated (at para. 22-23): "... ...

In finding that such payments by RBC were the consideration for a taxable supply by CAIL of Points, Hershfield J stated (at para. 28): Everything CAIL did from being involved in establishing the terms of the credit facility to advertising the program was to promote the use of the card by the issuance of Points and that is what it was paid for – the issuance of Points. ...

See summaries under s. 118.1 – total charitable gifts and s. 104(1). ...

") – earned management fees and rental fees from W.L. In 2003, the taxpayer lent $3.5 million to an arm's length supplier of specially prepared boards ("Interact") secured by patents held by Interact's principal ("Cable"). ...

Following a proposal by the Minister, over six months following the death of the taxpayer’s husband, to assess the taxpayer for trust income, she executed a form purporting to confirm that she had disclaimed her entitlement to income from the trust – and took the position that the distributions to her were of taxed capital. ...

Following a proposal by the Minister, over six months following the death of the taxpayer’s husband, to assess the taxpayer for trust income, she executed a form purporting to confirm that she had disclaimed her entitlement to income from the trust – and took the position that the distributions to her were of taxed capital. ...

Dussault J. found that the buy-back right represented an amount that "may reasonably be expected, having regard to statements and representations made in respect of the interest, to be received or enjoyed by a person (... 'the purchaser')... which receipt or enjoyment would have the effect of reducing the impact of any loss that the purchaser may sustain in respect of the interest" and found that the buy-back right could also be concluded to be more specifically referred to in Regulation 231(6)(c). ...

. … I am unable to see how the broad wording of the relevant provisions and the interpretation thereof by the Federal Court of Appeal that the wording is mandatory and should be strictly enforced, and which requires that the ITC claimant have the registration number assigned to the supplier, should result in any different outcome in this case ...

See summary under General Concepts – Sham. ...

The Queen, 2008 DTC 2591, 2008 TCC 58-- summary under Subsection 256(5.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 256- Subsection 256(5.1) 50% shareholder was entitled to one of two directors with tie-breaking vote The taxpayer was subject to the de facto control of the holder of ½ of its shares ("Bost") given that under the unanimous shareholder agreement between BOST and the other 50% shareholder (the "USA"), the board was to consist of one director nominated by each shareholder, a nominee of Bost was to be the Chairman, and in the event of a tie of votes, the Chairman was entitled to cast the deciding vote. ...