Search - 制暴无限杀机 下载

Results 2721 - 2730 of 2761 for 制暴无限杀机 下载
Decision summary

UBS AG v Commissioners for HMRC; DB Group Services (UK) Ltd v. Commissioners for HMRC, [2016] UKSC 13 -- summary under Tax Avoidance

. [T]he fact that Chapter 2 was introduced partly for the purpose of forestalling tax avoidance schemes self-evidently makes it difficult to attribute to Parliament an intention that it should apply to schemes which were carefully crafted to fall within its scope, purely for the purpose of tax avoidance. ...
Decision summary

Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd. v. HMRC, [2016] UKSC 21 -- summary under Subsection 169(1)

Ss. 26(1) and (2) provided that the amount of allowable input tax is that which is “attributable to” taxable “supplies made or to be made by the taxable person in the course or furtherance of his business.” ...
SCC (summary)

Canada (National Revenue) v. Thompson, 2016 SCC 21, [2016] 1 SCR 381 -- summary under Solicitor-Client Privilege

Wagner and Gason JJ. stated (at paras 17, 19 & 20): Solicitor-client privilege has evolved from being treated as a mere evidentiary rule to being considered a rule of substance and, now, a principle of fundamental justice… …[F]acts connected with that relationship (such as the bills of account at issue in Maranda [2003 SCC 67, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 193 at paras. 33-34]) must be presumed to be privileged absent evidence to the contrary…. ...
TCC (summary)

Poulin v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 154, briefly aff’d sub nomine Turgeon v. The Queen, 2017 FCA 103 -- summary under Paragraph 251(1)(c)

. Hélie Holdco served only to participate in the transaction for the benefit of Mr. ...
TCC (summary)

Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 172, aff'd 2018 FCA 124 -- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(bb)

Similarly, respecting the divestiture-related fees of Lazard Frères incurred up to board approval of a butterfly spin-off, these related to advice and approaches to potential third-party purchasers of the shares through which the laminated products business was held as well as to the ultimate sale (on a rollover basis) of the shares of that laminated products company to Novelis in consideration for the acquisition of (subsequently redeemed) preferred shares of Novelis, and the calculation of the Lazard Frères success fee did not represent a percentage of the value of those shares so that those fees also were deductible under s. 20(1)(bb) as well as under s. 9. ...
Decision summary

Bywater Investments Ltd. v Commissioner of Taxation; Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation, [2016] HCA 45 -- summary under Subsection 2(1)

It is the place that Courts of Appeals have called the corporation's 'nerve center' and not simply an office where the corporation holds its board meetings….” ...
TCC (summary)

101139810 Saskatchewan Ltd. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 3 -- summary under Paragraph 55(2.1)(b)

. I am inclined to favour a narrow construction of double taxation such that it arises where the same amount is taxed in the hands of the same person. ...
Decision summary

Picard v. Lagotte Succession, 2017 QCCS 330 (Quebec Superior Court) -- summary under Subsection 70(6.2)

Lagotte Succession, 2017 QCCS 330 (Quebec Superior Court)-- summary under Subsection 70(6.2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 70- Subsection 70(6.2) executor was authorized under will to choose not to elect Under the will of his deceased wife, the plaintiff (Picard) was a legatee by particular title of her principal residence as well as of an apartment building on which there was a substantial accrued gain but was not one of the residuary beneficiaries under her will. ...
TCC (summary)

The Armour Group Limited v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 65, aff'd 2018 FCA 134 -- summary under Contract or Option Cancellation

. [T]he leasehold interest that FSL obtained from ADL at a nominal rent under the New Ground Lease was a capital asset [having cited T Eaton, 99 DTC 5178, para. 36] and therefore that the payment made by FSL by offset on behalf of ADL was on capital account. ...
FCA (summary)

Canada v. Green, 2017 FCA 107 -- summary under Subsection 96(2.1)

The Crown considered that the PSLP business losses were deemed to be limited partnership losses of MLP which meant that they were effectively trapped in MLP given that s. 111 (and, thus, the ability to deduct limited partnership losses under s. 111(1)(e)) was only available to a taxpayer and not to a partnership. ...

Pages