Search - 丁薛祥 2025年年龄

CRA indicated that: “based on the context in which the RUTT regime was introduced … the definition of a RUTT should be interpreted broadly. ... The CRA Guidance stated that uncertainty is reflected in the financial statements, for example, if “the entity concluded it is not probable that the tax authority will accept an uncertain tax treatment and thus … it is probable that the entity will receive or pay amounts relating to the uncertain tax treatment ….” ... When that is the case, the RUTTs must be disclosed in Form RC3133 …. … [T]he notes to the audited financial statements prepared in accordance with … IFRS … or any other country-specific generally accepted accounting principles need to be considered when determining whether the uncertainty of tax treatments is reflected in the relevant financial statements …. ...

21 January 2025 External T.I. 2024-1041441E5- Return of Premium Life Insurance Policy-- summary under Proceeds of the Disposition Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 148- Subsection 148(9)- Proceeds of the Disposition In response to a query as to why the taxpayer was issued at T5 slip for the receipt on the maturity of a term life insurance policy of a return of premiums (ROP) benefit (i.e., an amount equal to the total previously paid premiums under the policy), CRA provided a general technical overview of the provisions relevant to computing a policy gain under s. 148(1), and then referred the correspondent to White for further illumination. ... In elaborating on this result, Morgan stated (at paras. 23-24): The Appellant naturally thought of the ROP benefit ($24,909) as a return of non-taxable dollars. … [T]he phrase “return of premium” may be an accurate description of the maximum amount received by the Appellant upon the expiry of the term but it is misleading for the following reason. ... What the insurer paid as a benefit upon the expiry of the term was not, in a business sense or in an income tax sense, any part of the premiums for life insurance. … It was part of the insurer’s earnings. ...

19 February 2025 External T.I. 2018-0744821E5 F- Régime d’assurance collective- groupe de personne-- summary under Subparagraph 6(1)(a)(i) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 6- Subsection 6(1)- Paragraph 6(1)(a)- Subparagraph 6(1)(a)(i) for a 2-person plan, a higher level of benefits for the majority shareholder would suggest that there was an individual policy for him, rather than being a group plan component A corporation which already offers group insurance (life, health and disability) to all its employees with the premiums paid by them, has created a supplementary disability insurance plan for two of its executive employees, one of whom is the majority shareholder. ... After noting that there would be no taxable benefit under s. 6(1)(a) from the employer's payment of the premiums if this arrangement qualified as a group plan described in s. 6(1)(a)(i), CRA stated: [A]n insurance plan can qualify as a group insurance plan if it covers two or more employees. … [F]or an individual disability insurance policy to be a component of a group insurance plan, it must be determined whether the level of benefits and the ratio of contributions to the plan shared by the employer and the employee are similar to those of the other employees covered by the same plan. ...