CRA Annual Report to Parliament 2008-2009 - Service Standards at the CRA – Overall Results
Disclaimer
We do not guarantee the accuracy of this copy of the CRA website.
Scraped Page Content
Service Standards at the CRA – Overall Results
About external service standards
Our service standards regime is a vital and integral part of our planning, reporting, and performance management processes. Meeting our service standards demonstrates that we are responsive to the needs of taxpayers and benefit recipients. This helps establish credibility in our operations and contributes to increasing the level of confidence that Canadians can place in government.
External service standards publicly state the level of performance that citizens can reasonably expect to encounter from the CRA under normal circumstances.
Over the years, the number of our service standards has increased, from 31 in 1999-2000 to 47 in 2008-2009. Since a review of our service standards had not been undertaken for more than 10 years, we decided to conduct a global review of service standards at the CRA. The purpose of the review was to determine whether we are communicating, monitoring, and reporting on the right services, with the right targets, in a way that is meaningful to, and effective for, stakeholders. The review is ongoing, with the final results to be available in 2009-2010.
How we set targets
We set targets for our service standards that represent the percentage or degree of expected attainment of an established standard. Targets are based on operational realities, historical performance, complexity of the work, and Canadians’ expectations. Our standards and targets are reviewed annually and, where necessary, updated.
Taking into consideration historical performance and the expectations of those who use our services, we set standards that are:
Successes and challenges
One of the purposes of having published service standards is to provide us with performance information so we can make the necessary changes to improve our results. Over the past year, we have experienced many successes and faced several challenges in meeting these standards. The following are key examples of our successes and challenges.
As noted earlier in this report, during 2008-2009, we received and processed more than 27.1 million individual tax returns, which was an increase of more than 8% over the prior year. Despite this increase, we again met all of our individual income tax processing service standards, including processing electronic individual income tax returns in an average of 11 days. We place a great deal of emphasis on achieving these service standards because they are critical to maintaining Canadians’ confidence in our organization as a responsive and trusted service provider.
During the past number of years, we have consistently met our service standards for Video and Film Tax Credits – Refundable Claims despite many challenges, including a significant increase in the volume of claims we have received. Our continued success in meeting our targets for these standards is directly attributable to the efforts and expertise of our Film Services agents. These results also reflect the degree to which the many repeat film tax claimants are familiar with their obligations and motivated to help us achieve short turnaround times. In this way, we support Canadian businesses, thereby fostering voluntary compliance with Canada’s tax laws.
Although we met certain service standards related to registered plans, we once again experienced challenges with others during 2008-2009. We have worked hard to identify solutions that will result in performance improvements. For example, with respect to services for clients of Deferred Income Plans and Actuarial Valuation Reports, we are addressing these shortcomings by engaging in enhanced outreach and the provision of improved information. Much work remains, however, in addressing all of the issues related to our service standards related to registered plans. It is important that we improve our performance for this sector, which manages over one trillion dollars in sheltered income for Canadians.
“Understanding what service users want and expect is integral to the ability of service providers to find ways of meeting these expectations and thereby satisfy their users’ needs.”
We also experienced a decline in performance this past year in our service standard for processing a request to authorize or cancel a representative. This was largely due to the introduction of the Represent a client service, which enabled representatives to view benefit recipients’ personal information and make changes online. Since many benefit recipients prefer to have a representative handle their affairs, we are currently in the process of implementing improvements so that we can again meet our targets in 2009-2010.
As we discussed in the section entitled Taxpayer and Business Assistance, our results declined slightly this past year for both our service standards related to the provision of technical income tax interpretations and for issuing advance income tax rulings. The decline in performance over last year was principally the result of increased file complexity and the ongoing challenges of retaining experienced staff for these specialized workloads. It is important for us to resolve these performance shortfalls because ongoing weak performance in these areas could jeopardize our ability to foster voluntary compliance with Canada’s tax legislation. For this reason, we have developed a comprehensive approach to studying what has led to the deteriorating performance result. We expect the study and related analysis to be completed by the end of 2009-2010.
Lastly, we experienced a significant decline in performance in our key Appeals service standard—acknowledgement of a dispute within 30 days of receipt. During 2008-2009, we experienced a 17 percentage point decline in our performance compared to 2007-2008, achieving a result of 68% against our performance target of 85%. This service standard fosters trust in our redress regime, so it is important that we take steps to address this performance shortfall. Consequently, we have completed a review of our intake centres and are implementing several recommendations to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our screening activities, including a temporary reallocation of resources during peak periods of dispute intake.
New service standards
In 2008-2009, we introduced two new standards in the Benefit Programs area for the accurate processing of requests to authorize or cancel a representative, with a target of 98%.
“The CRA is committed to developing, monitoring, and reporting on a full suite of service standards in areas of importance to taxpayers and benefit recipients.”
Adjustments
There were a number of changes to the CRA’s existing slate of service standards in 2008-2009. These are included in the table below:
Deletion
The GST/HST Visitor Rebate Program ended effective April 1, 2007 thus eliminating the need for a service standard.
NOTE: Where service standards are expressed in terms of a number of days, they refer to calendar days, unless otherwise specified.
Taxpayer and Business Assistance
80% [Footnote 1]
|
||||||||
Assessment of Returns and Payment Processing
7 weeks 2
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
19. Providing statements of interim payments (SIPS) to T2 corporate income tax/GST/HST clients on a monthly basis [Footnote 1]
|
||||||||
4.0 weeks [Footnote 2]
|
||||||||
1.6 weeks 2
|
||||||||
Within 21 days Within 30 days [Footnote 3]
|
||||||||
Accounts Receivable and Returns Compliance
n/a [Footnote 1]
|
95% [Footnote 1]
|
||||||||
The following table provides an update on service standards under development.
Service Standards Under Development in 2009-2010
- Date modified:
- 2009-11-05