Income Tax Severed Letters - 2026-06-24

Ruling

2025 Ruling 2025-1061971R3 - Loss consolidation arrangement

Unedited CRA Tags
9; 12(1)(x); 12(1)(c); 15(1); 18.2; 20(1)(c); 55(2); 56(2); 112(1); 88(1); 245(1); 246(1); Part IV, IV.1 and VI.1.

Principal Issues: Whether a loss consolidation arrangement involving a loan to buy preferred shares for the purposes of earning income would meet the CRA's requirement for acceptable loss consolidation transactions.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: Consistent with previous rulings.

2024 Ruling 2023-0968421R3 - First Nations Trust

Unedited CRA Tags
75(2); 104(6); 104(13); 104(24); 107(2); 248(1); 108(7); 108(1); 104(4)

Principal Issues: 1. Whether subsection 75(2) will apply to any income or loss from the Compensation Balance received by the Trust as described in Paragraph 13, or from property substituted therefor, and any taxable capital gain or allowable capital loss from the disposition of the Compensation Balance, or property substituted therefor. 2. Whether the trust will be able to make deductions under subsection 104(6) in respect of Annual Income of the Trust for a Taxation Year, excluding any income in respect of which subsection 75(2) applies, paid by the Trust to the First Nation during the Taxation Year under subsections XXXXXXXXXX of the Trust Agreement, and, after the Original Capital Use Date, under subsection XXXXXXXXXX of the Trust Agreement? 3. Where any property of the Trust is distributed by the Trust to the First Nation and there is a resulting disposition of all or any part of the First Nation’s capital interest in the Trust, will subsection 107(2) apply? 4. Will the payment of initial per capita distributions from the First Nation to its members be taxable?

Position: 1. Yes, such income shall be deemed to be income or a loss, as the case may be, or a taxable capital gain or allowable capital loss, as the case may be, of the First Nation, pursuant to subsection 75(2). 2. Such income will be considered to have become payable in the Taxation Year to the First Nation and may be deducted in computing the taxable income of the Trust for the Taxation Year pursuant to 104(6)(b). Income paid by the Trust to the First Nation pursuant to those subsections of the Trust Agreement during a Taxation Year will be considered to be sourced first from income in respect of which subsection 75(2) does not apply. 3. Yes, subject to subsections 107(2.001), (2.002) and (4) to (5), subsection 107(2) will apply. 4. No.

Reasons: 1. The First Nation will be the settlor of the Trust, directing Canada to make payments to the Trust on behalf of the First Nation. The First Nation is the sole beneficiary and on the termination of the Trust, all of the Trust’s property will be transferred to the First Nation. 2. Such amounts will be considered payable to the Beneficiary pursuant to subsection 104(24). 3. The law. 4. The payment of the initial per capita distributions is not considered income from a source within the meaning of paragraph 3(a), another source of income under subdivision d, or a disposition of property. Therefore, the initial per capita distributions received by the Members of the First Nation would not be included in calculating their income under Part I of the Act.

2024 Ruling 2023-0985741R3 F - 55(3)(a) internal reorganization

Unedited CRA Tags
55(2), 55(3)(a), 55(3.01), 55(4), 74.4

Principal Issues: Whether the reorganization meets the requirements of paragraph 55(3)(a).

Position: Yes.

Reasons: In compliance with the law and previous positions.

Technical Interpretation - External

28 April 2026 External T.I. 2025-1081341E5 - Labour Requirements: Consequences of not paying prevailing wages

Unedited CRA Tags
127.46, 127.44
a CCUS credit cannot be claimed at the regular rate while a wage shortfall has not yet been corrected/ reasonable care may include getting contractual covenants
computation of shortfall under s. 127.46(6)
a CCUS credit cannot be claimed at the regular rate while a wage shortfall has not yet been corrected, and such shortfall does not taint future years

Principal Issues: When can an incentive claimant correct a "shortfall" in the prevailing wage requirements in clause 127.46(3)(b)(i)(B), in order to be able to elect to meet the labour requirements, thus benefit from the regular tax credit rate on the CCUS ITC for a taxation year (here, 2025), while avoiding the addition to tax in subsection 127.46(6)?

Position: The election to meet the labour requirements in subsection 127.46(2) is made with the incentive claimant's claim for its 2025 CCUS ITC. In the hypothetical scenario described herein, the incentive claimant is aware that it has not met the Compensation Requirement in clause 127.46(3)(b)(i)(B) at the time that it intends to make its claim for the CCUS ITC for its 2025 taxation year. The incentive claimant can wait to make its CCUS ITC claim until it is able to pay the prevailing wage shortfall, within the time period specified in subsection 127.44(17), or, if this is not possible, it should not elect when it makes its claim for the CCUS ITC for its 2025 taxation year, thereby claiming the credit at the reduced tax credit rate. If the latter option is chosen, it may be possible for the incentive claimant to elect under subsection 127.46(2) when it makes its CCUS ITC claim for another taxation year, such as for 2026 or 2027.

Reasons: Our response is based on a textual, contextual and purposive analysis of the legislation, as it is applied to the hypothetical facts presented in this letter.

2 April 2026 External T.I. 2021-0917901E5 - Application of subsection 212.3(16)

Unedited CRA Tags
212.3(16)(a); 212.3(16)(c)(iii); 212.3(17)
how to apply the more closely-connected test in s. 212.3(16) where Canco has overlapping officers with its non-resident parent
Words and Phrases
reasonably regarded

Principal Issues: US Sub was originally acquired by a sister company of the CRIC (Canco) that is engaged in a completely separate and distinct business from Canco's. 1. Is the first condition in paragraph 212.3(16)(a) met on the basis that the business of US Sub is more closely connected to Canco, both of which are in Business Segment 1, despite the fact that US Sub was originally acquired by USCo which is in Business Segment 2? 2. What is the meaning of "reasonably expected" in the preamble in paragraph 212.3(16)(c) and "to a greater extent" and "any" in subparagraph 212.3(16)(c)(iii) of the Act? 3. How is the determination in subparagraph 212.3(16)(c)(iii) made where some of the officers of Canco are also officers of a non-resident corporation that does not deal at arm's length with Canco? 4. For the purpose of subparagraph 212.3(16)(c)(iii) of the Act, is it sufficient that the performance evaluation and compensation are based on the results of a business segment of the subject corporation?

Position: 1. Yes, based on the facts provided. 2. and 3. Whether the requirement in subparagraph 212.3(16)(c)(iii) is satisfied is a case-by-case determination to be made in light of all of the pertinent facts. 4. One must generally demonstrate that the performance evaluation and compensation of the officers are based on the operating results of the subject corporation to some extent.

Reasons: 1. Consistent with the Explanatory Notes to the provision and facts. 2. and 3. Based on the text of the provision, case law, and consistent with the Explanatory Notes applied to the provision. 4. Consistent with the Explanatory Notes to the provision.

18 March 2026 External T.I. 2023-0998191E5 - Mineral Resource Certification

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) "mineral resource"

Principal Issues: Whether a deposit qualifies as a mineral resource as that term is defined in subsection 248(1) of the Act where the principal minerals to be extracted are XXXXXXXXXX.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: Favourable opinion from NRCan.