Income Tax Severed Letters - 2026-05-27

Ruling

2025 Ruling 2024-1036051R3 F - Trust to trust transfer and vested indefeasibly

Unedited CRA Tags
108(1)(g) "trust", 248(1) "disposition", 248(3), 248(25.1), 248(25).

Principales Questions: 1) Whether a particular trust to trust transfer will meet the requirements of paragraph (f) of the definition of "disposition" in subsection 248(1)? 2) Whether the requirements of paragraph (g) of the definition of "trust" in subsection 108(1) will be met in a particular situation? 3) Whether the transfer of shares from the old trust to the new trust will result in an acquisition of control of the corporations for purposes of paragraph 251.2(2)(a)? 4) Whether subsection 245(2) will impact these conclusions?

Position Adoptée: 1) Yes. 2) Yes. 3) No. 4) No.

Raisons: 1) The new trust is identical to the original trust, except that the new trust permits indefeasible vesting. In this particular situation, the beneficiaries' respective rights are not affected by the trust to trust transfer and hence, the trust to trust transfer does not result in a change in beneficial ownership. 2) Prior positions. 3) The legal control of the corporations remains with the same trustees. 4) Wording of the Act and previous positions.

2023 Ruling 2022-0924531R3 - XXXXXXXXXX Merger

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1)

Principal Issues: Whether the "squeeze out" transactions under the DRULPA, as described under the Proposed Transactions, will result in 1) a disposition at the partner level, and 2) a disposition at the partnership level.

Position: 1) No, based on the facts provided. 2) No, based on the facts provided.

Reasons: The surviving partnership does not cease to exist.

Technical Interpretation - External

24 March 2026 External T.I. 2025-1061181E5 - Application of section 94: where contributions predate the 2007 taxation year.

Unedited CRA Tags
94(3)(a), definition of "contribution" in 94(1), 94(2)(a), 94(2)(g), section 4.3 of the Income Tax Conventions Interpretation Act.

Principal Issues: 1. Would a non-resident trust be deemed to be resident in Canada pursuant to paragraph 94(3)(a) when the relevant contribution was made to the trust in a year which predates the enactment of paragraph 94(3)(a) in a situation where all conditions are otherwise met? 2. How does the application of a tax treaty impact the application of subsection 94(3)? 3. What are the implications of applying section 94 to a non-resident trust which is not resident in a country with which Canada has a tax treaty?

Position: 1. Yes. 2. See below. 3. See below.

Reasons: 1. The event which triggers the application of section 94 can occur in taxation years which predate its enactment. 2. See below. 3. See below.

3 March 2026 External T.I. 2021-0917611E5 - Greece Special Solidarity Contribution

Unedited CRA Tags
Section 126

Principal Issues: (1) Whether Greece's Special Solidarity Contribution (SSC) paid on the Director's Fees is an "income or profits tax" for purposes of section 126. (2) Whether the Director's Fees are considered to be from a source in Greece for purposes of applying section 126 to SSC if the board of directors' meetings occur virtually while the taxpayer is physically present in Canada.

Position: (1) Yes, in this case, the SSC is an "income or profits tax" for purposes of section 126; however, we do not comment on whether SSC computed by reference to imputed income, which is computed by reference to the acquisition of assets in Greece, is an income or profits tax. (2) Article 23 of the Treaty deems the Director's Fees to arise from a source in Greece for purposes of providing a foreign tax credit.

Reasons: (1) The scheme of the SSC was comparable to the scheme of the income tax imposed under the Income Tax Act (Canada). The SSC was compulsory, imposed by the enactment of legislation by the Greek parliament, enforceable by such legislation, and enacted to generate revenue for the Greek state. The base on which the SSC is imposed is the same as the base on which the Greek income tax is imposed. Such tax base is based on "net" income, after deduction for allowable expenditures. (2) The SSC is a covered tax under Article 2 of the Treaty as it is a tax on income. Furthermore, Greek tax authorities have also acknowledged that the SSC is a covered tax under double tax agreements entered into by Greece. Therefore, the provisions of Article 23 of the Treaty applies in providing a foreign tax credit in Canada and, pursuant to Article 23(3), the Director's Fees, which can be taxed by Greece under Article 16, are deemed to arise from sources in Greece. However, we do not comment on whether SSC computed by reference to imputed income is a covered tax under Article 2.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

13 April 2026 Internal T.I. 2025-1082711I7 - MEANING OF "ON BEHALF OF" IN SUBPARAGRAPH 37(1)(A)

Unedited CRA Tags
37(1), 37(2), 127(5), 127(9), 248(1), ITR 238(2)

Principal Issues: Whether SR&ED is being performed "on behalf of" a "contract research organization" ("CRO").

Position: "On behalf of" refers to a relationship where the SR&ED claimant provides some direction or control or some other form of involvement in the SR&ED performer's activities, and the claimant has or acquires rights to the SR&ED performed by the performer.

Reasons: Past positions and jurisprudence.

20 March 2026 Internal T.I. 2025-1061521I7 - PARTNERSHIP LOSSES - MANDATORY VS DISCRETIONARY

Unedited CRA Tags
3(D), 9(1), 96(1)(G)

Principal Issues: Is it mandatory for a taxpayer who is a partner of a partnership to include a loss allocated from the partnership in computing the partner's income for the year, or is claiming the loss discretionary?

Position: It is mandatory.

Reasons: Required by paragraphs 3(d) and 96(1)(g).