Income Tax Severed Letters - 2016-08-24

Ruling

2016 Ruling 2015-0604451R3 - 95(2)(a)(i)

CRA Tags
95(2)(a)(i)
where CFAs hold commercial properties needed for their regulated active businesses through individual property subsidiaries of a Holdco proportionately owned by them, the property rents are s. 95(2)(a)(i) income

Principal Issues: Does subparagraph 95(2)(a)(i) apply to recharacterize the income from property earned by the single-purpose controlled foreign affiliates from a commercial real estate investment that comprises part of the investments required to be held by another foreign affiliate to XXXXXXXXXX of its XXXXXXXXXX business?

Position: Yes

Reasons: Subparagraph 95(2)(a)(i) will apply to include a certain proportion of the income earned by each foreign affiliate from its real estate investment in its income from an active business to the extent that the shares of that foreign affiliate are directly or indirectly held by foreign affiliates engaged in an active regulated XXXXXXXXXX business and those shares are XXXXXXXXXX in that business within the quantum and in the manner required by the relevant local regulatory authority.

Technical Interpretation - External

8 June 2016 External T.I. 2016-0629351E5 - reimbursement of moving expenses

CRA Tags
6(1)(a), 248(1) "eligible relocation"

Principal Issues: Is the employer the primary beneficiary of reimbursed moving expenses that do not qualify for the moving expense deduction in section 62?

Position: Likely yes

Reasons: See response

1 June 2016 External T.I. 2015-0601211E5 - Mortgage loan from RRSP to make a shareholder loan

CRA Tags
20(1)(c), 207.01(1) "excluded property", 207.01(1) "prohibited investment", 207.01(1) "RRSP strip"
money borrowed by individual from RRSP to make interest-free loan to corporation
use of qualified mortgage loan proceeds of no import
4900(1)(j.1) insurance requirements generally arm's length/potential advantage on default
4900(1)(j.1) mortgage loan unlikely to be acquired at less than FMV

Principal Issues: (1) Is interest paid on borrowed money deductible when the use of the funds is to make a non-interest bearing shareholder loan? (2) Is a mortgage loan a qualified investment for the subject RRSP by virtue of paragraph (d) of the definition “qualified investment” in subsection 146(1) of the Act and paragraph 4900(1)(j.1) of the Regulations? (3) Is the taxpayer’s use of the funds to make a shareholder loan an eligible use of the property of the RRSP?

Position: (1) General comments provided. (2) Yes. (3) Yes, but the advantage rules and prohibited investment rules must be considered. General comments provided.

Reasons: (1) Question of fact. (2) The provisions of paragraph 4900(1)(j.1) of the Regulations. (3) The legislation. Questions of fact.

27 April 2016 External T.I. 2015-0605111E5 - QDT - Preferred beneficiary election

CRA Tags
108(1)

Principal Issues: 1. Has the introduction of the QDT rules affected the availability of the preferred beneficiary election? Have there been any changes to the method in which the preferred beneficiary election is made? 2. Does a trust that otherwise qualifies to make the joint election to be a QDT and to make the preferred beneficiary election have the ability to choose which election to make, if any? 3. Can a trust that has elected to be a QDT for a taxation year also make a preferred beneficiary election in the same year? 4. Can an existing trust make a joint election to be a QDT in 2016?

Position: 1. No. 2. Yes. 3. Yes. 4. Yes.

Reasons: 1. There have been no changes to the preferred beneficiary election rules as a result of the changes to the rules applicable to testamentary trusts, including the introduction of the QDT. Similarly, there has been no change to the method in which the preferred beneficiary election is made. 2. Both the QDT and preferred beneficiary election are elective provisions. As such, the trustees together with the disabled beneficiary can choose which joint election will be made, if any. 3. QDTs and the preferred beneficiary election are not mutually exclusive elections. It is possible for a trust that has made a joint election to be a QDT to also make a preferred beneficiary election. 4. Provided that the trust meets the requirements to be a QDT as outlined in the definition of QDT in subsection 122(3), the trust can make a joint election to be a QDT. There is no requirement that the trust is created after 2015.