Income Tax Severed Letters - 2008-10-24

Ruling

2008 Ruling 2008-0280791R3 - Entity Classification

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) definition of "corporation" and "share"

Principal Issues: Whether the proposed XXXXXXXXXX cooperative will be treated as a corporation for purposes of the Act.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The provisions of the foreign legislation and the articles creating the cooperative support the conclusion that this cooperative will be treated as a corporation for purposes of the Act.

2008 Ruling 2007-0251681R3 - Butterfly and freeze of an estate

Unedited CRA Tags
55

Principal Issues: Standard rulings provided on this butterfly transaction.

2008 Ruling 2008-0283681R3 - Credit Union Shares

Unedited CRA Tags
137(4.1) 137(4.2) 248(1)

Principal Issues: (1) What is the amount of the stock dividend declared and paid to members of a credit union and (2) whether Part VI.1 tax is exigible?

Position: (1) The amount of the stock dividend is the amount by which the paid-up capital of the XXXXXXXXXX Shares is increased by reason of the payment of the stock dividend which is calculated in reference to the par value of each Share. (2) Part VI.1 tax does not apply.

Reasons: (1) Pursuant to paragraph (c) of the definition "amount" in subsection 248(1) and provisions of governing federal legislation. (2) By virtue of the operation of subsections 137(4.1) and (4.2) the amount of the stock dividend is deemed to be interest and deemed not to be dividend, notwithstanding any other provision of the Act.

2008 Ruling 2008-0271251R3 - Arrangements related to dealer's commission

Unedited CRA Tags
132(6)(b) 212(1) Reg. 105
joint obligation for deferred sales charges

Principal Issues: 1. Whether or not the Earned Fees will be subject to the tax imposed under Part XIII of the Act .
2. Whether or not section 105 of the Income Tax Regulation will apply to require withholding of tax from the Earned Fees.
3. Whether or not the effective guarantee of the Earned Fees provided by the joint and several obligation of the New Fund in respect of the Fees and the New Fund's obligation as withholding agent in respect of Deferred Sales Charges will disqualify the New Fund from meeting the requirements under paragraph 132(6)(b) of the Act.

Position: 1. The Earned Fees will not be subject to the tax imposed under Part XIII of the Act.
2. Section 105 of the Regulation will not apply.
3. They will not disqualify the New Fund from meeting the requirements under paragraph 132(6)(b) of the Act.

Reasons: 1. Such amounts are not described in any of paragraphs 212(1)(a), (b), (d) or (o) of the Act.
2. Such amounts are not consideration paid for services performed in Canada.
3. The New Fund is not engaged in the business of providing guarantees or of lending money. The provision of the guarantee is integrated to the investment of the funds. The engagement to withhold the Deferred sale charges from the proceeds of the units and remit them is not an undertaking of its own. The New Fund is not paid for the withholding and it is highly integrated with the redemption of the units which is not an undertaking that would disqualify the mutual fund trust.

2008 Ruling 2007-0246431R3 - Deferred share unit plan

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) 6801(d)

Principal Issues: Will a proposed amendment to allow deferred share units (DSUs) to be used as collateral for a loan from a financial institution that is unrelated to the employer, result in a particular plan no longer satisfying the conditions of 6801(d) of the Regulations?

Position: The amendment, in and of itself, will not affect the plan for purposes of the conditions as described in paragraph 6801(d) of the Regulations.

Reasons: Wording of the Act

2008 Ruling 2007-0259531R3 - Forgiveness of interest

Unedited CRA Tags
80(2)(b) 246(1)

Principal Issues: Is the forgiveness of interest applicable to the pre-acquisition period subject to the rules of section 80?

Position: YES

Reasons: 80(2)(b) deems the interest payable as having a principal amount

2008 Ruling 2008-0271191R3 - Deferred share unit plan: 6801(d)

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1)

Principal Issues: Will the proposed deferred share unit plan be excluded from the salary deferral rules?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The proposed plan meets the requirements of paragraph 6801(d) of the Regulations.

2008 Ruling 2008-0274041R3 - supplemental ruling

Unedited CRA Tags
80

Principal Issues: Minor change to a paragraph

Position: Accepted

Reasons: Minor- Rulings remains binding.

Technical Interpretation - External

17 October 2008 External T.I. 2008-0266301E5 - Deductibility of motor vehicle expenses

Unedited CRA Tags
8(1)(h.1)

Principal Issues: Deductibility of motor vehicle expenses for certain employees.

Position: Question of fact but in this case they don't appear to be deductible.

Reasons: The law. Amounts are for personal travel.

17 October 2008 External T.I. 2008-0266831E5 - Subsection 81(3).

Unedited CRA Tags
81(3)

Principal Issues: Can the elected board of directors of a provincially incorporated corporation representing the XXXXXXXXXX claim a tax exemption under subsection 81(3) of the Act on allowances paid to them by the corporation?

Position: No.

Reasons: The corporation is not an incorporated municipality, municipal utilities board, commission, corporation or similar body or a school board as required by the legislation.

14 October 2008 External T.I. 2008-0288541E5 - (spousal) trust to trust transfer

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1)

Principal Issues: In the situation where property is transferred from a spousal trust to another trust, will there be a change in beneficial ownership such that paragraph (f) of the definition of disposition will apply and the spousal trust will not realize a disposition as a result of the transfer?

Position: While it is a question of fact as to whether a particular set of transactions results in a change of beneficial ownership, if paragraph (f) of the definition of disposition applies to the transfer of assets from a spousal trust to another trust, the other trust will be deemed to be a continuation of the initial spousal trust such that any distribution out of the new trust to a person other than the spouse who is the beneficiary of the initial trust while that spouse is still alive will result in deemed proceeds of disposition equal to FMV in respect of the disposition that arises by reason of that distribution.

Reasons: 248(25.1)

6 October 2008 External T.I. 2008-0290421E5 - Education Credit- Reimbursement

Unedited CRA Tags
118.6 118.5

Principal Issues: Is the education tax credit available when student has received reimbursement for the course/program and has been T4'd for the reimbursement?

Position: No.

Reasons: 118.6(1) definition of a qualifying program specifically excludes programs for which any sort of allowance, benefit, grant or reimbursement is provided by an arm's length person.

2008-029042
XXXXXXXXXX Pamela Burnley
(613) 957-3498
October 6, 2008

6 October 2008 External T.I. 2008-0271421E5 F - Terres à bois-plan d'aménagement forestier Québec

Unedited CRA Tags
70(9) 73(3)
Quebec regional agencies’ plans for forest management plans would generally satisfy s. 73(3)(c), whose “engaged” requirement would be met if such plans did not require work
“engaged” requirement in s. 70(9)(a) is satisfied to extent the forest management plan requires no action
woodlot, to be a farm, must focus on the fostering of the stand

Principales Questions: 1) Est-ce que les conditions prévues par le paragraphe 73(3) de la Loi sont respectées?
2) Quel élément de preuve l'ARC exige-t-elle pour démontrer qu'un contribuable prenait part dans la mesure requise par un plan d'aménagement forestier visé par règlement?
3) Est-ce que l'ARC interprète le paragraphe 70(9) de la Loi de la même manière que le paragraphe 73(3) de la Loi?

Position Adoptée: 1) Commentaires généraux
2) Aucune
3) Le paragraphe 70(9) de la Loi comporte des conditions semblables à celles du paragraphe 73(3). Ainsi, l'alinéa 70(9)a) de la Loi sera interprété de la même manière que le paragraphe 73(3)c) de la Loi.

Raisons: 1) Question de fait
2) Cette question relève des bureaux des services fiscaux ou des centres fiscaux qui effectuent la vérification de la déclaration d'impôt.
3) Libellé de l'alinéa 70(9)a) et de l'alinéa 73(3)c)

1 October 2008 External T.I. 2006-0174701E5 - FTC for 75(2) trust paid by settlor-beneficiary

Unedited CRA Tags
126(1) 20(11) 20(12)

Principal Issues: Assuming that subsection 75(2) applies notwithstanding proposed paragraph 75(3)(c.2) and that income is attributed to a resident of Canada from a non-resident trust which is not deemed resident under current 94(1)(c) (because of the exemption for the first 4 years after becoming resident in Canada), will the taxpayer be entitled to a deduction under 20(11) and\ a foreign tax credit under 126(1) in respect of the foreign taxes paid by the non-resident trust?

Position: Question of fact but assuming that:
•the taxpayer is resident in Canada;
•the taxpayer pays the foreign (US) tax directly because of the US tax rules governing grantor trusts;
•the trust is not resident in Canada under common law principles and will not be deemed to be resident in Canada under 94(1)(c) during the "immigrant period" -typically the 4 years following immigration when the taxpayer has not been resident in Canada for 60 months before the end of the tax year (and assuming, contrary to expectations, that 75(2) will apply notwithstanding proposed 75(3)(c.1));
•the income earned by the property is on US marketable securities which is not taxable Canadian property or real property;
a reasonable argument can be made that the taxpayer would be entitled to a deduction under 20(11) for amounts in excess of 15% of the foreign taxes paid and under 20(12) for any portion of the 15% so desired. To the extent that the taxpayer does not claim a deduction under 20(12), a foreign tax credit would be allowed under 126(1) in respect of the 15%

Reasons: Questions such as these are highly fact dependant; however, this position is consistent with the position taken in 2007-023370 and 2002-0143605

29 September 2008 External T.I. 2008-0288661E5 - Deferred Salary Leave Plan - Retiring After Leave

Unedited CRA Tags
ITR 6801(a)

Principal Issues: What are the tax consequences if an employee retires after a
period of leave under a DSLP?

Position: The arrangement would cease to be a DSLP at the time the conditions in paragraph 6801(a) are not met with the result that any unpaid deferred salary would be included in the employee's income at that time

Reasons: Paragraph 6801(a) of the Regulations requires a DSLP provide that a participant return to work following their leave of absence.

26 September 2008 External T.I. 2008-0276151E5 - Employment Expenses

Unedited CRA Tags
8(1)(h.1) 8(13) 8(1)(i) 8(10)

Principal Issues: What are the requirements for filing a T2200 as they relate to a salaried employee's employment

Position: General comments on deductibility. Form T2200 must be completed if the employee is required to pay for certain items under the contract of employment.

Reasons: Question of fact and the law.

22 September 2008 External T.I. 2008-0288691E5 - Real estate commissions and 12(1)(x) and 13(7.4)

Unedited CRA Tags
12(1)(x) 13(7.4)

Principal Issues: Is a taxpayer able to make an election under subsection 13(7.4) of the Income Tax Act to reduce the capital cost of leasehold improvements, where the taxpayer received an amount, from a real estate agent, on signing a lease for office premises, with a landlord.

Position: No

Reasons: In the scenario described, the amount is not received in respect of a particular property acquired by the taxpayer.

3 September 2008 External T.I. 2008-0280951E5 - Designated Stock Exchange

Unedited CRA Tags
204

Principal Issues: Would an investment in a limited partnership unit by an RRSP trust be considered a qualified investment for purposes of the RRSP legislation where the particular units are listed as an investment fund on the Irish Stock Exchange?

Position: Question of fact, the determination as to whether or not a particular tier of a stock exchange would be considered "designated" is not a matter of income tax interpretation

Reasons: Referred to the Department of Finance

Technical Interpretation - Internal

14 October 2008 Internal T.I. 2008-0278571I7 - Child Support

Unedited CRA Tags
56.1 63.1

Principal Issues: Where there was an addition, after April 1997, of a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) clause to a pre-May 1997 agreement would this be considered to be a variation of the agreement such that the agreement would have a commencement day?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The COLA clause was not built into the pre-May 1997 agreement but was added to the agreement after April 1997 and an increase in child support would result.

19 September 2008 Internal T.I. 2008-0272441I7 - GUILT LOCK DERIVATIVE

Unedited CRA Tags
38 20(1)(e) 9
derivative that effectively locked in effective interest rate on proposed bond issuance on income account
hedging expense to lock in interest rate

Principal Issues: Is the termination payment on a Guilt lock on account of capital or income, and can 20(1)(e) apply?

Position: In our view the payment reflects the underlying transaction, namely the interest on the bond which would be deductible over the term of the bond.

Reasons: The Guilt Lock is a derivative hedge tied to a government bond based on the yield for a proposed issuance of a Eurobond.