Income Tax Severed Letters - 2006-03-03

Ruling

2006 Ruling 2005-0157341R3 - ATR-Sale of Assets and Shareholder/Manager Bonus

Unedited CRA Tags
67 18(1)(a) 5(1) 78(4)

Principal Issues: Whether the proceeds from the proposed sale of eligible capital property and depreciable property can be paid to the shareholder/manager as a deductible bonus.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: It is within the scope of CRA policy with respect to shareholder/manager remuneration. The company has a history of declaring bonuses to its sole shareholder/manager to remunerate him for the profits the company has earned that are attributable to his special know-how and professional skill. The company is a CCPC paying a bonus to the active shareholder/manager who is resident in Canada, in order to reduce the CCPC's taxable income to an amount that approximates or is less than an amount which is eligible for the small business deduction. The bonus is deductible since it is incurred for the purpose of earning business income and is reasonable.

2006 Ruling 2005-0160471R3 - Loss Utilization in an affiliated group

Unedited CRA Tags
111 55(2)

Principal Issues: Transfer of income producing property between affiliated corporations to utilize non-capital losses. Is deemed dividend subject to 55(2)?

Position: Loss transactions are acceptable. Subsection 55(2) will apply to the deemed dividend however.

Reasons: The law.

2005 Ruling 2005-0150881R3 - Executor's Fees

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(c) 248(1) def. of "office"

Principal Issues: Whether executor's fees received for the administration of an estate constitute income from an office?

Position: Yes

Reasons: Where an executor of an estate does not act in that capacity in the course of carrying on a business, the fees for acting as executor are income from an office.

Ministerial Correspondence

14 February 2006 Ministerial Correspondence 2006-0168201M4 - Travel Expenses Construction Workers

Unedited CRA Tags
8

Principal Issues: Deductibility of travel expenses for construction workers who travel from home to one or more construction sites that are their regular places of employment.

Position: Not deductible.

Reasons: Travel is personal.

Technical Interpretation - External

1 March 2006 External T.I. 2005-0126951E5 - personal residence exemption

Unedited CRA Tags
45(1) 45(3)

Principal Issues: Various questions relating to the principal residence exemption and change in use from income-producing to principal residence.

Position: General information provided.

2005-012695
XXXXXXXXXX Renée Shields
(613) 948-5273
March 1, 2006

20 February 2006 External T.I. 2005-0159061E5 - Shareholder loan

Unedited CRA Tags
15(2)

Principal Issues: Whether loan to employee/shareholder for purchase of home is included in income under 15(2) if bona fide arrangements for payment are made and prescribed interest rate is charged on the loan.

Position: Question of fact, but likely yes.

Reasons: It is a question of fact whether the exception to subsection 15(2), provided in paragraph 15(2.4)(b) would apply such that the employee/shareholder who received a loan in the taxation year to purchase a dwelling would not be required to include the amount in his or her income for the year under subsection 15(2). For the exception to apply under paragraph 15(2.4)(b) the requirements in paragraphs 15(2.4)(e) and (f), must both be met. In the particular case at issue, even if bona fide arrangements were made (at the time the loan was made) for repayment of the loan within a reasonable time - per paragraph 15(2.4)(f), it is not reasonable to conclude that the employee or the employee's spouse received the loan because of the employee's employment. The highest amount previously loaned out to an employee by the corporation is $10,000. The employee/shareholder plans to borrow $300,000 to $400,000 to acquire a new home in his existing neighbourhood.

17 February 2006 External T.I. 2005-0153931E5 F - Primes d'installation médecins

Unedited CRA Tags
6 12(1)x)
signing bonuses to medical practitioners to establish in remote areas are taxable
signing bonuses to medical practitioners to locate in remote areas are a taxable benefit

Principales Questions:
1. Est-ce que les primes d'installation versées aux médecins dans le cadre des programmes mis en place par le gouvernement du Québec afin de favoriser l'installation des médecins dans les régions éloignées sont imposables?

Position Adoptée:
1. Oui

Raisons:
Application du paragraphe 12(1)x) de la Loi
IT-273R2
Application du paragraphe 6

15 February 2006 External T.I. 2005-0163161E5 - Medical Expense Tax Credit - Stair Lift

Unedited CRA Tags
118.2(2)(l.2) 118.2(2)(m) 118(6)

Principal Issues: Is the cost of installing a stair lift in the home of a disabled adult child a qualifying medical expense to the parent if the child has multiple sclerosis?

Position: Question of fact. Will likely qualify if the child is a dependant of the parent within the meaning of subsection 118(6) of the Act.

Reasons: Words of the Act.

15 February 2006 External T.I. 2005-0126831E5 F - 120.4(1) - définition : montant exclu

Unedited CRA Tags
120.4(1)
para. (a) exclusion does not apply to substituted property
phrase “substituted property” must be used to engage s. 248(5)

Principales Questions:
1. À la définition de " montant exclu " au paragraphe 120.4(1) L.I.R., est-ce que l'expression " le revenu tiré d'un bien acquis par le particulier, ou pour son compte, par suite du décès .... " inclut également le revenu tiré d'un bien de substitut ou de remplacement au bien acquis par suite du décès?

Position Adoptée:
1. Non

Raisons:
1. Application du paragraphe 120.4(1) de la Loi.

14 February 2006 External T.I. 2005-0150361E5 - Small Business Corporation

Unedited CRA Tags
110.6(1) 248(1)

Principal Issues: Whether a corporation operating work-camp would qualify as a "small business corporation"

Position: Question of fact.

Reasons: Corporation is not a personal services business and not likely a specified investment business within the meaning of subsection 125(7).

13 February 2006 External T.I. 2005-0126271E5 - Taxation of non-residents

Unedited CRA Tags
2(3) 115 118.1 118.5

Principal Issues: 1. Is an organization residing in France taxable in Canada in a particular situation?
2. Are consultant fees paid to non-resident consultants (that are not employees) by an organization residing in France taxable in Canada?
3. Is employment income received by the staff of the organization residing in France for the services provided in Canada taxable in Canada?

Position: 1. In the particular situation, no.
2. It depends on the Tax Convention between Canada and the country of residence of the consultants. If the country is France, it would appear that in the particular situation, the consultant fees would not be taxable in Canada. However, except where a waiver of withholding is issued, the payer would have to withhold 15% of the amount paid pursuant to section 105 of the Regulations. If the non-resident is not taxable in Canada because of the Tax Convention, he will obtain a refund of the tax withheld when he produces a Canadian tax return.
3. If the employee is a resident of France, it will depend on whether paragraph 2 of article XV of the Tax Convention applies. If it applies, the employment income will be taxed only in France. However, except where a waiver of withholding is obtained, the withholding and remitting will be the same as for a resident employee. If the non-resident is not taxable in Canada because of the Tax Convention, he will obtain a refund of the income tax withheld when he produces a Canadian tax return.

Reasons: 1. There is no permanent establishment in Canada. Article VII of the Tax Convention between Canada and France provides that the profits of an enterprise of France shall be taxable only in France unless the enterprise carries on business in Canada through a permanent establishment situated in Canada.
2. If the consultant is resident in France, article XIV of the Tax Convention between Canada and France provides that income derived by a resident of France in respect of professional services or other independant activities of a similar character shall be taxable only in France unless he has a fixed base regularly available to him in Canada for the purpose of performing his activities. In the particular situation, the consultants did not have a fixed base regularly available to them. Section 105 of the Income Tax Regulations.
3. Paragraph 2 of article XV of the Tax Convention between Canada and France provides that if the conditions of that paragraph are met, the remuneration derived by a resident of France in respect of an employment exercised in Canada shall be taxable only in France. Paragraph 153(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act and section 102 of the Income Tax Regulations.

1 February 2006 External T.I. 2005-0142411E5 F - Don entre vifs - bien agricole admissible

Unedited CRA Tags
69(1) 110.6(1) 110.6(6)
words of transfer not determinative as to whether there is a gift or sale for nominal consideration

Principales Questions:
1. Quelles sont les conséquences fiscales de dons entre vifs n'ayant aucun lien de dépendance, à une valeur inférieure à la JVM?
2. Est-ce qu'un bien immeuble, qui a été acquis par héritage par un particulier, suite au décès de son père qui a exploité une entreprise agricole, est un "bien agricole admissible" aux fins de la déduction pour gains en capital prévue au paragraphe 110.6(2) de la Loi?

Position Adoptée:
1. Dans cette situation, le paragraphe 69(1) de la Loi s'applique. Par conséquent, le produit de disposition du donateur est réputé égal à la juste valeur marchandes des biens immobiliers donnés.
2. Oui, si le père du donateur a utilisé dans le cadre de l'exploitation d'une entreprise agricole, soit au cours de l'année où le particulier dispose du bien ou soit pendant au moins cinq ans, pendant lesquelles le bien est la propriété d'une telle personne.

Raisons:
1. Application du paragraphe 69(1) de la Loi.
2. Définition de "bien agricole admissible" soit les exigences que l'on retrouve aux sous-alinéa 110.6(1)vii) de la Loi.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

14 February 2006 Internal T.I. 2004-0096641I7 - Representative of a Member State to the ICAO

Principal Issues: Whether Article 34 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCRD) exempts a diplomatic agent from tax on the gain resulting from the disposition of his or her residence?

Position: No.

Reasons: Paragraph (d) of Article 34 of the VCDR.