Principal Issues:
Change in facts to Ruling 960165-3.
1.Will we allow repayment of the shareholder loans and a "special dividend"; the proceeds of which will be used to pay the personal income tax liabilities of the shareholders; to be financed by way of DPS issued out of the company?
2.Will we allow payables that were in part owing at the time the original Ruling letter was issued, but were omitted from the list due primarily "poor" accounting records, to be refinanced by way of DPS?
3.Will we grant an extension of time?
Position:
1.No, refinancing of related party debt of the company is not permissable by the legislation and a "special dividend payment" to the shareholder that is financed by DPS is not permissable since it takes the DPS too far (see E9420543). In effect, the taxpayer is requesting that DPS financing be made available to individuals which is clearly inconsistent with the Act.
2.Permitted, nothing sinister here. It was recognized at the time of the original request that the accounting records of XXXXXXXXXX were in a mess. Further, we recognize that generally such "specified" or "agreed" amounts, where they represent normal accruals to a point in time, are approximations only and the actual amounts could vary slightly depending on the length of time once the final date of the transaction is determined.
3.Granted.
Reasons: See above.