Medical expenses
Disclaimer
We do not guarantee the accuracy of this copy of the CRA website.
Scraped Page Content
Calculate payroll deductions and contributions
- Get ready to make deductions
- Determine if a benefit is taxable
- What is a taxable benefit
- Medical expenses, including payments from a private health services plan (PHSP)
-
Other taxable benefits
- Automobile or motor vehicle benefits – Allowances or reimbursements provided to an employee for the use of their own vehicle
- Automobile provided by the employer
- Board and lodging expenses
- Cell phone and internet services
- Child care expenses
- Counselling services and tax preparation
- Disability-related employment benefits
- Educational assistance
- Employee profit sharing plans (ESPS)
- Event tickets
- Gifts, awards, and long-service awards
- Insurance plans
- Loans and employee debt
- Loyalty or other points programs
- Meal expenses
- Merchandise discounts and commissions from personal purchases
- Motor vehicle provided by the employer
- Moving expenses and relocation benefits
- Parking
- Professional membership dues
- Recreational facilities and club dues
- Contributions to savings and pension plans
- Employee security (stock) options
- Social events and hospitality functions
- Tool reimbursements, allowances and rental payments
- Transportation and airline passes
- Travel expenses
- Board, lodging, and transportation at a special work site in a prescribed zone
- Uniforms, protective clothing, safety and special clothing
- Determine the tax treatment of payments other than regular employment income
- How to calculate
- Make corrections before filing
Medical expenses, including payments from a private health services plan (PHSP)
You may be looking for:
Content has been updated for clarity, completeness and plain language. No changes were made to the current CRA administrative policy.
Generally, if you pay directly or reimburse your employee for medical examinations or medical expenses, the payment is a taxable benefit. However, medical expenses paid under the terms of a private health services plan (PHSP) will not be taxable.
On this page
Steps
-
Determine if any exceptions apply to the benefit
The benefit may not be taxable if the benefit is provided in one of the following situations:
-
If the benefit is provided in one of the above situations, do not continue to the next step.
Learn more on the above exceptions using the links.
- If the benefit is not provided in one of the above situations, continue to Step 2 - Determine if a benefit is taxable.
-
-
Determine if a benefit is taxable
Generally, if you pay directly or reimburse your employee for medical examinations and medical expenses, these amounts are taxable. Depending on your situation, the benefit may not be taxable.
Non-taxable situation
The benefit is not taxable if one of the following applies:
-
Medical examination
You pay directly or reimburse your employee for a medical examination that was required for your employee to meet a condition of employment. The medical examination is considered to be primarily for your benefit.
Example
An employer reimburses an employee for a medical examination required as a condition of employment. As the exam is primarily for the benefit of the employer, the amount reimbursed by the employer would not be a taxable benefit to the employee.
-
Medical expenses
Your employee’s medical expenses were paid under a private health services plan (PHSP).
A plan is considered a PHSP where all of the following conditions are met:
-
All of the expenses covered under the plan are:
- Medical and hospital expenses (medical expenses)
- Expenses incurred in connection with a medical expense and within a reasonable time period following the medical expenses (connected expenses)
- Combination of medical expenses and connected expenses
Example - Connected expenses
The employee group medical insurance plan for Company ABC covers the cost of transporting an employee and their vehicle home if that employee becomes ill while out of Canada. That employee must return to Canada for medical treatment but cannot drive because of their illness.
In this situation, the cost of transporting the vehicle to the employee’s home is not a medical expense. However, as long as it is incurred within a reasonable time after the medical expense, it is considered a connected expense because the employee could not drive back to Canada to get medical treatment (which is a medical expense).
-
“All or substantially all” (90% or more) of the premiums paid relate to medical expenses that are eligible for the medical expense tax credit (METC)
How to determine if a plan meets the “all or substantially all” (90% or more)
Insured plan (plan is backed by a contract of insurance)
An insured plan meets the "all or substantially all" (generally 90% or more) requirement if “all or substantially all” of the premiums paid in the calendar year relate to medical expenses that are eligible for the METC.
The benefits paid to employees in the calendar year are not considered in determining whether the plan meets the “all or substantially all” requirement.
The following example explains when the “all or substantially all” requirement will be met for an insured plan.
Example - Insured plan
The group employee insurance plan for Company XYZ covers the following four types of expenses:
Table of Insured plan meeting the Private Health Services Plan requirements
Insured plan meeting the Private Health Services Plan requirements Type of expense Eligible for the METC Percentage of premiums paid in the calendar year that relates to the expense Benefits paid in the calendar year Prescription drugs Yes 70% 69% Dental expenses Yes 10% 11% Hospital expenses Yes 12% 7% Medical expenses that are not eligible
for the METCNo 8% 13% This plan meets the “all or substantially all” requirement because 92% (70% + 10% + 12%) of the premiums paid relate to medical expenses that are eligible for the METC, while 8% of the premiums relate to other medical expenses. The fact that only 87% (69% + 11% + 7%) of the total benefits paid relate to medical expenses that are eligible for the METC is not relevant in determining whether the plan qualifies as a PHSP.
Self-insured plan (plan is not backed by a contract of insurance)
When a plan is not backed by a contract of insurance, the CRA considers it to be a self-insured plan.
A self-insured plan meets the “all or substantially all” (generally 90% or more) requirement for a calendar year if “all or substantially all” of the benefits paid to all employees that year are for medical expenses that are eligible for the METC.
The following example explains when the “all or substantially all” requirement will be met for a self-insured plan.
Example - Self-insured plan
Company AAA pays the following benefits to its employees in a calendar year under its self-insured group employee insurance plan.
Table of Self-insured plan meeting the Private Health Services Plan requirements
Self-insured plan meeting the Private Health Services Plan requirements - Prescription drugs eligible for METC Dental expenses eligible for the METC Hospital expenses eligible for the METC Medical expenses not eligible for the METC Total benefits paid per employee Kim $3,000 $1,000 Nil $500 $4,500 Mohammed $2,000 $1,500 $800 Nil $4,300 Simon $4,000 $500 Nil $500 $5,000 Total medical expenses $9,000 $3,000 $800 $1,000 $13,800 This plan meets the “all or substantially all” requirement because the benefits paid to all employees in the year for medical expenses that are eligible for the METC represent 93% ($9,000 + $3,000 + $800) of the total benefits ($13,800) paid.
If you provide benefits through a self-insured plan that consists of health care spending accounts (HCSAs), the method for determining whether the plan satisfies the “all or substantially all” requirement for a particular calendar year is the same as for self-insured plans that do not consist of a HCSA. The employees' allocation of the ceiling amount to the various types of expense in an HCSA is not considered.
Most employers that offer HCSAs do so under one group plan. However, in rare circumstances, each HCSA can be considered a separate insurance plan. The determination of whether one group plan or several individual plans exist must be based on the law and the facts of the case. For more information on HCSAs, see paragraphs 14 to 18 of Interpretation Bulletin IT-529, Flexible Employee Benefit Programs.
The following example explains when self-insured HCSAs would meet the “all or substantially all” requirement.
Example - Health care spending accounts
Company BBB provides one self-insured group plan that consists of three HCSAs, each with a $5,000 ceiling amount. At the start of the calendar year, each employee allocates the $5,000 ceiling, as shown in the table below.
Table of Health care spending accounts
Health care spending accounts - Allocation of ceiling amount to medical expenses Benefits paid in the calendar year Eligible for the METC Not eligible for the METC Total ceiling per employee Expenses eligible for the METC Expenses not eligible for the METC Total benefits paid per employee Ann $4,000 $1,000 $5,000 $4,000 $200 $4,200 Sue $3,500 $1,500 $5,000 $3,250 $650 $3,900 Jim $4,500 $500 $5,000 $4,250 $175 $4,425 Total ceiling $12,000 $3,000 $15,000 - - - Total benefits - - - $11,500 $1,025 $12,525 The plan shown above meets the “all or substantially all” requirement. The total benefits paid to all employees that year for expenses that are eligible for the METC are 92% ($11,500) of the total benefits paid ($12,525). The fact that the total ceiling amounts allocated for expenses that are eligible for the METC ($12,000) are only 80% of the total ceiling amount, eligible and non-eligible ($15,000), is not relevant in determining whether the plan meets the “all or substantially all” requirement.
However, if each HCSA is determined to be a separate plan:
- Ann's plan satisfies the “all or substantially all” requirement because the benefits she received for expenses that are eligible for the METC are 95% ($4,000) of the total benefits ($4,200) that she received in the year.
- Sue's plan does not satisfy the “all or substantially all” requirement because the benefits she received for expenses that are eligible for the METC are only 83% ($3,250) of the total benefits ($3,900) she received in the year.
- Jim's plan satisfies the “all or substantially all” requirement because the benefits he received for expenses that are eligible for the METC are 96% ($4,250) of the total benefits ($4,425) he received in the year.
Multiple plans
Whether one or multiple plans exist is a question of fact and law. Multiple plans cannot be combined in determining if the “all or substantially all” requirement has been satisfied.
-
The plan is in the nature of insurance and contains all of the following elements:
- An undertaking by one person
- To indemnify another person
- For an agreed consideration
- From a loss or liability in respect of an event
- The happening of which is uncertain
- The plan provides coverage only to your employee, your employee’s spouse or common law partner, or any member of your employee’s household with whom your employee is connected by blood relationship, marriage or adoption
-
Taxable situation
If the benefit does not meet one of the conditions above, the benefit is taxable.
-
If the benefit is not taxable, you do not need to do any calculations.
Do not continue to the next step.
- If the benefit is taxable, continue to: Step 3 - Calculate the value of the benefit.
-
-
Calculate the value of the benefit
If the benefit is taxable, the value of the benefit is equal to:
- Value of the benefit received or enjoyed
- minus Any amounts your employee reimbursed you
- equals Value of the benefit to be included on the T4 slip using code 40 and box 14
Example - Calculations
An employer reimbursed their employee $300 throughout the year for prescription drugs but the amount was not paid under a private health services plan. Since it was not paid under the terms of a PHSP, the amount would be a taxable benefit.
- $300 is the value of the benefit received or enjoyed
- minus $0 because the employee does not reimburse the employer
- equals $300 is the value of the benefit to be included on the T4 slip using code 40 and box 14
-
Withhold payroll deductions and remit GST/HST
The withholding and remitting requirement depends on the type of remuneration: cash , non-cash , or near-cash .
If the benefit is taxable, you must withhold the following deductions:
-
Non-cash and near-cash: Option 1
Withhold:
- Income tax
- CPP
- EI (do not withhold)
Remit:
- GST/HST in certain situations
-
Cash: Option 2
Withhold:
- Income tax
- CPP
- EI
Do not remit:
- GST/HST (do not remit)
The amounts must be included in the pay period they were received or enjoyed.
Learn how to calculate deductions and the GST/HST to remit: How to calculate - Calculate payroll deductions and contributions
-
-
Report the benefit on a slip
If the benefit is taxable, you must report the following amounts on the T4 slip:
-
Non-cash and near-cash: Option 1
Report on:
- Box 14 - Employment income
- Box 26 - CPP/QPP pensionable earnings
- Code 40 - Other taxable allowances and benefits
-
Cash: Option 2
Report on:
- Box 14 - Employment income
- Box 24 - EI insurable earnings
- Box 26 - CPP/QPP pensionable earnings
- Code 40 - Other taxable allowances and benefits
Learn how to report on a slip: Fill out the slips and summaries - File information returns (slips and summaries).
-
References
Legislation
- ITA: Section 6
- Amounts to be included as income from office or employment
- ITA: 6(1)(a)
- Value of benefits
- ITA: 6(1)(b)
- Personal or living expenses (allowances)
- ITA: 118.2(2)(a)
- Medical expenses
- CPP: 12(1)
- Amount of contributory salary and wages
- ETA: 173
- Taxable benefit is considered a supply for GST/HST purposes
- IECPR: 2(1)
- Amount of insurable earnings
- IECPR: 2(3)
- Amounts not included in insurable earnings
- IECPR: 2(3)(a.1)
- Amounts not included in insurable earnings when excluded as income under paragraph 6(1)(a) or (b), or subsection 6(6) or (16) of the ITA
Cash
Near-cash
Non-cash
Page details
- Date modified:
- 2025-06-05