Words and Phrases - "disbursement"
The Queen v. Esskay Farms Ltd., 76 DTC 6010, [1976] CTC 24 (FCTD)
The taxpayer, wished to sell land to the City of Calgary in consideration for two annual instalments in order to defer a portion of the gain to its second taxation year, but was informed that the City was precluded by statute from purchasing land over a period of years. As a result: the taxpayer sold the land to a trust company for the same purchase price, but payable in two instalments with the second instalment bearing interest at 7.5% per annum, and with a clause in the purchase agreement that the trust company could elect within 60 days of the date of the agreement of sale to void the agreement; and the trust company sold the land to the City for the same purchase price, paid in cash. Title was transferred directly from the taxpayer to the City.
In finding that the transactions did not entail a conferral of a benefit by the trust company on the taxpayer, Cattanach J. noted (at p. 6018) that the taxpayer acknowledged its obligation to pay income tax on the profit realized by it on the sale of the land when the deferred payments were received by it.
Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
---|---|---|
Tax Topics - General Concepts - Agency | weight given to written agreement terms in finding that intermediary purchased as principal | 122 |
Tax Topics - General Concepts - Evidence | 81 | |
Tax Topics - General Concepts - Sham | no sham if documents describe intended legal rights | 354 |
Tax Topics - General Concepts - Tax Avoidance | no sham if documents describe intended legal rights | 354 |
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - 101-110 - Section 104 - Subsection 104(2) | 143 | |
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 20 - Subsection 20(1) - Paragraph 20(1)(n) | 199 | |
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Old | 57 | |
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Provincial Law | 58 |