Search - convention
Results 291 - 300 of 537 for convention
TCC
Joseph Gleddie v. Minister of National Revenue, [1985] 1 CTC 2217, 85 DTC 224
To complete the pattern, the 1979 set of financial statements filed is reproduced: JOSEPH GLEDDIE STATEMENT OF INCOME For The Year Ended December 31, 1979 (Prepared Without Audit) (Based On Information Supplied By Client) (For Income Tax Purposes Only) REVENUE Professional — Cash Credits $ 31,302.96 Add: Accounts Receivable at December 31, 1979 2,430.00 Total Revenue $ 33,732.96 EXPENSES Accounting and Legal $ 496.00 Advertising and Promotion 1,897.70 Automotive (Business Portion): Gas and Oil 454.36 Repairs and Maintenance 813.70 Parking 635.50 Insurance 477.00 Capital Cost Allowance (Schedule) 8,179.90 Convention Expenses 1,311.04 Loan Interest and Charges 4,903.77 Office In The House Expenses (Business Portion): Office Supplies and Stationery $1,1,79.24 Telephone 468.50 Utilities 309.85 Mortgage Interest 2,987.91 Property Taxes 441.29 Repairs and Maintenance 43.88 Management Fees 275.39 Insurance 82.00 5,788.06 Total Expenses $24,957.03 Net Income For Tax Purposes 18,775.93 CAPITAL COST ALLOWANCE SCHEDULE Proceeds Class U.C.C. ... As to the “Advertising and Promotion” and the “Convention Expenses”, their current value (during the years in question) is in great doubt — simply put, Mr Gleddie could not take on any outside contracts. ...
TCC
Tremblay v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 100
Tremblay participated in the "Americana" convention. His goal was to meet clients and potential partners there. During the convention, he became acquainted with company representatives for GSI and Englobe. ...
TCC
Houle v. The Queen, 2006 DTC 2476, 2006 TCC 144
) [12] Section 81 of the Income Tax Act reads: 81. (1) There shall not be included in computing the income of a taxpayer for a taxation year, (a) an amount that is declared to be exempt from income tax by any other enactment of Parliament, other than an amount received or receivable by an individual that is exempt by virtue of a provision contained in a tax convention or agreement with another country that has the force of law in Canada; … [13] In Mitchell v. ...
TCC
Bujnowski v. The Queen, 2005 DTC 247, 2005 TCC 90 (Informal Procedure)
Furthermore, pursuant to the Canada-United States Tax Convention, he was not qualified to be exempt from US taxation on employment income earned there. ...
TCC
Pâquet v. MNR, 92 DTC 2151, [1992] 1 CTC 2699 (TCC)
(«Rasquier»), une corporation qui exploitait un centre d'accueil privé conventionné, situé à Charlesbourg, Québec. ...
TCC
Armada Equipment Corporation v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 879, 2007 TCC 260 (Informal Procedure)
The Respondent relies on the definition of “prescribed expenditure” in Regulation 2902: 2902 For the purposes of the definition “qualified expenditure” in subsection 127(9) of the Act, a prescribed expenditure is (a) an expenditure of a current nature incurred by a taxpayer in respect of (i) the general administration or management of a business, including (A) administrative salary or wages and related benefits in respect of a person whose duties are not all or substantially all directed to the prosecution of scientific research and experimental development, except to the extent that such expenditure is described in subsection 2900(2) or (3) (B) a legal or accounting fee, (C) an amount described in any of paragraphs 20(1)(c) to (g) of the Act, (D) an entertainment expense, (E) an advertising or selling expense, (F) a conference or convention expense, (G) a due or fee in respect of membership in a scientific or technical society or organization, and (H) a fine or penalty, or (ii) the maintenance and upkeep of premises, facilities or equipment to the extent that such expenditure is not attributable to the prosecution of scientific research; [11] Counsel for the Appellant argued that the amount $18,618 paid to Deacur & Co. was directly attributable to the Appellant’s prosecution of SR&ED within Regulation 2900(2)(c) because that payment would not have been incurred if such prosecution had not occurred. ...
TCC
Arbutus Gardens Apartments Corp. v. R., 98 DTC 1795, [1998] 3 CTC 2972 (TCC)
Although it was pleaded that the assessments, for technical reasons, were invalid and that they were contrary to the Canada-Netherlands Tax Convention these points were not pursued at trial. ...
TCC
Harvey v. R., 98 DTC 1089, [1997] 3 C.T.C. 3022 (TCC)
For example, professional licence fees and dues, convention expenses, continuing education expenses, professional malpractice insurance, etc., paid for by the PMC will not be eligible for “mark-up”. ...
TCC
Harrowston Corporation v. The Queen, 93 DTC 995, [1993] 2 CTC 2247 (TCC), aff'd 96 DTC 6544 (FCA)
(However, under Article XI of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention in force at that time, this tax is limited to 15 per cent). ...
TCC
Roberts v. The Queen, 2010 DTC 1061 [at at 2826], 2010 TCC 52 (Informal Procedure)
There shall not be included in computing the income of a taxpayer for a taxation year, (a) Statutory exemptions- an amount that is declared to be exempt from income tax by any other enactment of Parliament, other than an amount received or receivable by an individual that is exempt by virtue of a provision contained in a tax convention or agreement with another country that has the force of law in Canada; Jurisprudence – The Connecting Factors Test [4] In Williams v. ...