Search - considered
Results 25821 - 25830 of 49239 for considered
Technical Interpretation - Internal
13 February 2007 Internal T.I. 2006-0217701I7 - Retroactive Support Arrears
Paragraph 60.1(3)(a) provides that such amounts paid in the period ("Prior Period") consisting of the period prior to the time in the year when the agreement or order is made or in the preceding year, are deemed to be paid under the agreement or order if the document provides that they are to be so considered. ... As explained in paragraph 22 of Interpretation Bulletin IT-530R, Support Payments, a lump sum payment required by a court order or written agreement in respect of a period prior to the date of the order or agreement is not considered a qualifying support amount for purposes of subsection 56.1(4). ...
Conference
6 October 2006 Roundtable, 2006-0195961C6 F - FCA decision La Survivance
Reasons: (1) The CRA has decided not to seek leave to appeal of the decision of the FCA before the SCC on the ground that this decision does not raise any question of national impact. (2) It seems that, the concept of "control in fact", as per its meaning in subsection 256(5.1) of the ITA, appears not to have been considered in the determination of whether La Survivance was eligible to a BIL under subparagraph 39(1)(c)(iii) of the ITA TABLE RONDE SUR LA FISCALITÉ FÉDÉRALE APFF- CONGRÈS 2006 Question 24 Jurisprudence Dans La Survivance c. ... However, it seems that, in this case, the concept of "control in fact", as per its meaning in subsection 256(5.1) of the ITA, appears not to have been considered in the determination of whether La Survivance was eligible to a BIL under subparagraph 39(1)(c)(iii) of the ITA. ...
Conference
14 September 2017 Roundtable, 2017-0703881C6 - CPA Alberta 2017 Q17: Electric Vehicle Taxable Benefits
(a) Would the cost of the charging station be considered part of the cost of the vehicle (ie a capital component) or part of the operating costs of the electric vehicle (and thus subsumed in the operating expense benefit)? ... In our view, there are no specific factors beyond those described in Income Tax Folio S2-F3-C2 that would be considered in situations involving electric vehicles. ...
Technical Interpretation - External
6 April 2005 External T.I. 2005-0116491E5 - Beneficiary Designation - RRSP
In order for a trust, funded with the proceeds of an RRSP or an RRIF available on the death of an individual and the terms of which have been established during the individual's lifetime separate from his will, to be considered a "testamentary trust" within the meaning of subsection 108(1) of the Act, in our view, the following conditions would have to be satisfied:? ... The designation of the trust as beneficiary of the RRSP or RRIF is considered under the applicable provincial legislation to be a testamentary instrument;? ...
Technical Interpretation - External
13 April 2005 External T.I. 2004-0104911E5 - Child care expenses
However, when the payment made is for a child under the compulsory school age, the services being provided are generally considered child care rather than education, unless the facts indicate otherwise. ... On the other hand, for those students who do not use such services before or after school, no amount of the fees paid on their behalf can be considered as a child care expense. ...
Technical Interpretation - External
30 May 2005 External T.I. 2005-0127821E5 - RRIF - Disabled Child Beneficiary
To establish the contrary, the child or the child's legal representative may write to the tax services office outlining the reasons why the child should be considered financially dependent on the annuitant at the time of death. Factors that would be considered when establishing the existence of a child or grandchild's financial dependence include: 1. the income of the child from all sources; 2. the cost of living (including the cost of the child or grandchild's medical or special care requirements being paid by the annuitant at time of death) and the ability of the child to provide for self-support; and 3. the support provided to the child from sources other than income (including the annuitant). ...
Ruling
2005 Ruling 2005-0112561R3 - Part XIII on Payments for Patent Use
To the best of your knowledge and that of Licensee1, none of the issues involved in this ruling request: i. is in an earlier return of Licensee1 or a related person; ii. is being considered by a Tax Services Office or Taxation Centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of Licensee1 or a related person; iii. is under objection by Licensee1 or a related person; iv. is before the courts; or v. is the subject of a ruling previously considered by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate. ...
Technical Interpretation - External
14 June 2005 External T.I. 2004-0086631E5 - royalty-reproduction distribution
Royalty payments for the right to reproduce copies of the copyrighted work of an artist and to distribute those copies are considered by the CRA to be royalties in respect of a copyright in respect of the production or reproduction of the work that are exempt from Part XIII tax under subparagraph 212(1)(d)(vi) of the Act. ... However, where a license agreement also specifies that the licensor agrees not to reproduce or distribute or permit any other person to reproduce or distribute copies of the artistic work in a particular geographical area specifically assigned to the licensee, a portion of the payments derived by the licensor under the agreement would be considered in respect of such undertaking and would fall under subparagraph 212(1)(d)(iv) of the Act. ...
Technical Interpretation - External
27 June 2005 External T.I. 2005-0125561E5 - RRSP/DPSP benefits received by a status Indian
However, investment income is generally considered to be earned off reserve and, as such, is taxable to a status Indian upon receipt. ... A calculation can then be made to determine the part of the withdrawal that is reasonably considered to be in respect of the non-taxable withdrawal of the contributions made with tax-exempt income. ...
Technical Interpretation - External
15 July 2005 External T.I. 2005-0130471E5 - DPSP Forfeitures and Withholding
Further, for purposes of the withholding requirements under subsection 103(4) of the Regulations, any payment from a DPSP (other than as referred to in subparagraph 147(2)(k)(v) of the Act) will be considered a lump sum payment pursuant to paragraph 103(6)(b) of the Regulations and therefore, will be subject to withholding at the lump sum rates. ... As such, it is our view that an amount is considered "paid" where it involves the actual or constructive delivery of money or its equivalent in return for goods or services or in discharge of an obligation. ...