Search - considered
Results 10761 - 10770 of 49416 for considered
FCA
1351231 Ontario Inc. v. Canada (the King), 2025 FCA 53
The sale closed on April 11, 2018. [10] Neither the Appellant nor the purchaser remitted GST in respect of the sale of the Condominium. [11] When assessing the Appellant for its annual GST reporting period between June 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018, the Minister assessed the Appellant $77,079.64 as GST/HST collectable on the sale of the Condominium. [5] We have considered the appellant’s arguments. ...
FCTD
Drinkwalter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 FC 913
Cash payments may be considered but the benefit recipient must “submit sufficient and convincing documentation or records to substantiate their earnings,” which may take various forms, such as depositing the earnings in a bank account, keeping records of hours worked or showing a list of expenses. ...
FCA
Whelan v. Canada, 2025 FCA 107
In examining the issue of control, the Tax Court considered the workers’ ability to innovate, but only in the sense that they knew what was expected of them and did their work without trying to change things. ...
FCTD
Thompson v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2025 FC 1420
The CRA also considered her previously filed letter indicating that she incurred $1,675.43 in business expenses in 2019, and her statement during a conversation with the CRA that the “majority” of her business expenses were incurred in 2019. ...
TCC
Cassan v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 174
I wouldn’t have ever considered the investment were it not for the charities. ... The rate on 20-year provincial bonds, which he considered to be a very safe investment, was in the range of 4.5% to 4.7%. The rate on 20-year Canadian corporate bonds, which he considered to be a riskier investment, was 5.3%. [243] [183] Mr. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal
16 June 2015 Internal T.I. 2015-0569011I7 - Clergy Residence Deduction
Whether fees paid for the use of a dormitory room would be considered rent for purposes of computing the clergy residence deduction? ... You have also asked whether the fees paid for the use of a dormitory room would be considered rent for purposes of computing the clergy residence deduction. ... However, technical interpretation (TI) 2012-045596 considered the meaning of this phrase for purposes of paragraph 8(1)(c) of the Act, and noted that a principal place of residence is generally considered to be the place where an individual regularly lived, slept, received mail, etc., and in some cases, where the individual's immediate family also resided. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal
6 December 2012 Internal T.I. 2012-0458401I7 - Penalties - Foreign Reporting Forms
In addition, due to the requirement to establish gross negligence, the penalties provided by 163(2) are not being considered in these situations. ... Where a prescribed form received by CRA is considered invalid, it follows that it has not been filed as and when required by the Act. ... In that case it was stated that where a taxpayer has only provided limited information in a form, the form is considered to be invalid. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal
23 May 1995 Internal T.I. 9510337 - ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP COSTS
XXXXXXXXXX also argues that according to IT-128R paragraph 4(b) expenditures made to restore property to its original condition are considered to be current expense. ... The clean-up expenditures considered at the present time are incurred in respect of XXXXXXXXXX 2. ... XXXXXXXXXX 9.Revenue Canada has determined that a landlord's costs to remove asbestos are considered capital in nature rather than current expense. ...
Technical Interpretation - External
28 June 2010 External T.I. 2009-0329511E5 - United States - Dividend Withholding Rate
S-Corp owned by a US resident individual are entitled to the 5% withholding rate under Article X(a) of the Canada-United States Tax Convention (Treaty) Position: The 5% rate is applicable where the S-Corp is, pursuant to Article X(2)(a), considered to own at least 10% of the shares of Canco, the dividends are considered to be derived by the S-Corp pursuant to Article IV(6), and the S-Corp is eligible for benefits under Article XXIX A of the Canada-United States Tax Convention (Treaty). ... You have asked us: (a) Whether the Treaty would apply to limit Canada's taxation to 5% of the gross amount of the dividend; and (b) Whether the S-Corp would be considered a qualifying person under Article XXIX A of the Treaty. ... Subparagraph 2(a) of Article X of the Treaty provides, that for the purpose of determining whether the beneficial owner of a dividend is a corporation that is a resident of a Contracting State that owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the company paying the dividend,... a company that is a resident of a Contracting State shall be considered to own the voting stock owned by an entity that is considered fiscally transparent under the laws of that State... in proportion to the company's ownership interest in that entity Under subparagraph 2(a), the S-Corp would be considered to own the shares of Canco owned by the US LLC. ...
Conference
18 November 2014 Roundtable, 2014-0550401C6 - 2014 TEI Liaison Meeting, Q. E3
Position: 1) Generally a tender offer (i.e. an offer which requires an acceptance by the holder in the form of a tender of the relevant obligation by the holder directly to the issuer) is not considered to be an open market repurchase for purposes of subsection 39(3). 2) Generally, a bond repurchase that is negotiated and concluded directly between an issuer and a holder is not considered to be an open market repurchase for purposes of subsection 39(3). 3) Generally, the exercise by the issuer of an early repayment right pursuant to the terms of a bond is not considered to be an open market repurchase for purposes of subsection 39(3). ... Generally a bond repurchase that is negotiated and concluded directly between an issuer and a holder is not considered to be an open market repurchase for purposes of subsection 39(3). Generally the exercise by the issuer of an early repayment right pursuant to the terms of a bond is not considered to be an open market repurchase for purposes of subsection 39(3). ...