Search - consideration

It receives no consideration in return in terms of interest. Gestion immobilière Norstar, a name of the numbered company 9179-0543 Québec Inc., which seems to be connected, according to Ms. ...

The Court should not interfere if the Minister did not rely upon irrelevant or extraneous considerations (Barron v. ...

. ·          “excluded production” « production exclue » “excluded production” means a film or video production, of a particular corporation that is a prescribed taxable Canadian corporation, o         (a) in respect of which §          (i) the particular corporation has not filed an application for a certificate of completion before the production’s application deadline, §          (ii) a certificate of completion has not been issued before the production’s certification deadline, §          (iii) where the production is not a treaty co-production, neither the particular corporation nor another prescribed taxable Canadian corporation related to the particular corporation §          (A) is, except to the extent of an interest in the production held by a prescribed taxable Canadian corporation as a co-producer of the production or by a prescribed person, the exclusive worldwide copyright owner in the production for all commercial exploitation purposes for the 25-year period that begins at the earliest time after the production was completed that it is commercially exploitable, and §          (B) controls the initial licensing of commercial exploitation, §          (iv) there is not an agreement in writing, for consideration at fair market value, to have the production shown in Canada within the 2-year period that begins at the earliest time after the production was completed that it is commercially exploitable, §          (A) with a corporation that is a Canadian and is a distributor of film or video productions, or §          (B) with a corporation that holds a broadcasting license issued by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission for television markets, or §          (v) distribution is made in Canada within the 2-year period that begins at the earliest time after the production was completed that it is commercially exploitable by a person that is not a Canadian, or o         (b) that is §          (i) news, current events or public affairs programming, or a programme that includes weather or market reports, §          (ii) a talk show, §          (iii) a production in respect of a game, questionnaire or contest (other than a production directed primarily at minors), §          (iv) a sports event or activity, §          (v) a gala presentation or an awards show, §          (vi) a production that solicits funds, §          (vii) reality television, §          (viii) pornography, §          (ix) advertising, §          (x) a production produced primarily for industrial, corporate or institutional purposes, or §          (xi) a production, other than a documentary, all or substantially all of which consists of stock footage. ·          “producer” « producteur » “producer” means a producer of a film or video production, except that it does not include a person unless the person is the individual who o         (a) controls and is the central decision maker in respect of the production; o         (b) is directly responsible for the acquisition of the production story or screenplay and the development, creative and financial control and exploitation of the production; and o         (c) is identified in the production as being the producer of the production. ·          “remuneration” « rémunération » “remuneration” means remuneration other than an amount determined by reference to profits or revenues. ·          “twinning arrangement” « convention de jumelage » “twinning arrangement” means the pairing of two distinct film or video productions, one of which is a Canadian film or video production and the other of which is a foreign film or video production. ...

So I will grant the withdrawal,…     [14]            The essence of the Court’s concern was that time was taken, without notice to the Respondents, in the consideration of preliminary matters that should have been dealt with by motion heard in advance of a hearing specifically dedicated to the hearing of witnesses and argument on the fundamental issue of the guilt or otherwise of contempt on the part of the Respondents ...

. […]   [49]            There, the Supreme Court considered the grammatical and ordinary sense of the words at issue, the scheme of the act under consideration, the legislative history and evolution of the provisions in issue and the purpose of the legislation ...

Background – Procedural History [16]   This is the second motion to certify a class action based on allegations by the Beekeepers that: 1) Following the expiry of HIPR 2004, the Federal Crown denied the Beekeepers the right to seek import permits for “packages”, rejecting any applications for import permits without consideration; 2) The Federal Crown informed commercial beekeepers that the border remained closed to American “packages”, and the Federal Crown would not reconsider this policy until a new risk assessment was completed, which it represented would only be done following an “official request” from the Canadian Honey Council (“Honey Council”); 3) As a result of the Federal Crown’s unlawful extension of the prohibition against “package” imports, commercial beekeepers were forced to buy replacement bees from less desirable sources, and use more time-intensive and expensive measures to keep their bees alive over the winter. ...

Merck]) [34]   Although this consideration speaks to corporate offenders, which the Respondents are not, premeditation and deliberation are relevant for the purpose of this sentencing. [35]   In this case, the conduct does not appear to have been entirely premeditated; in my view, the Respondents made wrong choices when faced with pressure from a crowd at the meeting. ...

Corning says it was an error for the Commissioner to refer to these issues as “general design considerations” applicable to any module, without citing prior art references describing how a skilled person would design a fiber splitter module, or indicating that these are obvious issues. [77]   Corning stated that, at the hearing, the Examiner admitted that it would be unusual for a designer to make an acceptable working system on the first attempt, and would first have to build prototypes and conduct tests. ...

. … … (4) In deciding whether to allow an application, the Division must consider any relevant factors, including (4) Pour décider si elle accueille ou non la demande, la Section prend en considération tout élément pertinent, notamment: (a) the document’s relevance and probative value; a) la pertinence et la valeur probante du document; (b) any new evidence the document brings to the appeal; and b) toute nouvelle preuve que le document apporte à l’appel; (c) whether the person who is the subject of the appeal, with reasonable effort, could have provided the document or written submissions with the appellant’s record, respondent’s record or reply record. c) la possibilité qu’aurait eue la personne en cause, en faisant des efforts raisonnables, de transmettre le document ou les observations écrites avec le dossier de l’appelant, le dossier de l’intimé ou le dossier de réplique.   171 In the case of a proceeding of the Refugee Appeal Division, 171 S’agissant de la Section d’appel des réfugiés: … … (a.3) the Division may receive and base a decision on evidence that is adduced in the proceedings and considered credible or trustworthy in the circumstances; a.3) elle peut recevoir les éléments de preuve qu’elle juge crédibles ou dignes de foi en l’occurrence et fonder sur eux sa décision; [34]   The RAD and may confirm or substitute the RPD decision, or refer the matter back for re-determination: IRPA s 111(1). 111 (1) After considering the appeal, the Refugee Appeal Division shall make one of the following decisions: 111 (1) La Section d’appel des réfugiés confirme la décision attaquée, casse la décision et y substitue la décision qui aurait dû être rendue ou renvoie, conformément à ses instructions, l’affaire à la Section de la protection des réfugiés. ...

Counsel submits that the liability for the tax is imposed by section 27 of the Excise Tax Act. 27. (1) There shall be imposed, levied and collected a consumption or sales tax at the rate specified in subsection (1.1) on the sale price of all goods (a) produced or manufactured in Canada (i) payable, in any case other than a case mentioned in subparagraph (ii) or (iii), by the producer or manufacturer at the time when the goods are delivered to the purchaser or at the time when the property in the goods passes, whichever is the earlier, (ii) payable, in a case where the contract for the sale of the goods (including a hire-purchase contract and any other contract under which property in the goods passes upon satisfaction of a condition) provides that the sale price or other consideration shall be paid to the manufacturer or producer by instalments (whether the contract provides that the goods are to be delivered or property in the goods is to pass before or after payment of any or all instalments), by the producer or manufacturer pro tanto at the time each of the instalments becomes payable in accordance with the terms of the contract, and (iii) payable, in a case where the goods are for use by the producer or manufacturer thereof, by the producer or manufacturer at the time the goods are appropriated for use; This section deals with a service. ...