Search - consideration
Results 121 - 130 of 1111 for consideration
Decision summary
Grands Palais du nouveau Saint-Laurent Inc. v. Agence du revenu du Québec, 2020 QCCQ 281 -- summary under Subsection 254(6)
Agence du revenu du Québec, 2020 QCCQ 281-- summary under Subsection 254(6) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 254- Subsection 254(6) builder "ought to know" of rebate ineligibility based on CRA/ARQ Bulletins The Quebec new housing rebate is essentially the same as the ETA equivalent, except that entitlement to it is lost at a lower dollar level of total consideration for the “residential complex” that is purchased. Croteau, J.C.Q. found that the consideration paid by purchasers for new condo units in a complex also included the $25,000 they paid for an underground parking spot. ... Accordingly, for 93 of the purchases, the total consideration exceeded the dollar threshold, after taking the extra $25,000 into account. ...
TCC (summary)
Dr. Kevin L. Davis Dentistry Professional Corporation v. The Queen, 2021 TCC 25, aff'd 2023 FCA 76 -- summary under Paragraph 3(b)
The Queen, 2021 TCC 25, aff'd 2023 FCA 76-- summary under Paragraph 3(b) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Regulations- Input Tax Credit Information (GST/HST) Regulations- Section 3- Paragraph 3(b) invoices showing nil tax and not allocating between the included zero-rated and exempt supply complied with s. 3 A professional corporation’s orthodontics practice claimed input tax credits on the basis of an administrative arrangement of CRA with the Canadian Dental Association under which orthodontists filed their GST returns using 35% of the patient’s total treatment cost as an estimate of the consideration for the supply of the orthodontic appliance (which was zero-rated), with only the balance treated as exempt- and with a requirement, when the annual results became available at year end, to reconcile their 35% ITC estimate with their actual taxable supplies. However, in the view of CRA, the corporation did not comply with the requirement under this policy to “identify the consideration for the zero-rated supply of the appliance separately from the consideration for the exempt supply of services” (the agreement with the patient stated that “[o]ur orthodontic fee includes a portion, up to 35%, relating to the value of orthodontic appliances,” but the invoices contained no allocation between the services and device. ...
TCC (summary)
Dr. Kevin L. Davis Dentistry Professional Corporation v. The Queen, 2021 TCC 25, aff'd 2023 FCA 76 -- summary under Subsection 169(5)
The Queen, 2021 TCC 25, aff'd 2023 FCA 76-- summary under Subsection 169(5) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 169- Subsection 169(5) agreement with the Canadian Dental Association was an exercise of discretion under s. 169(5) A professional corporation’s orthodontics practice claimed input tax credits on the basis of an administrative arrangement of CRA with the Canadian Dental Association under which orthodontists filed their GST returns using 35% of the patient’s total treatment cost as an estimate of the consideration for the supply of the orthodontic appliance (which was zero-rated), with only the balance treated as exempt- and with a requirement, when the annual results became available at year end, to reconcile their 35% ITC estimate with their actual taxable supplies. However, in the view of CRA, the corporation did not comply with the requirement under this policy to “identify the consideration for the zero-rated supply of the appliance separately from the consideration for the exempt supply of services” (the agreement with the patient stated that “[o]ur orthodontic fee includes a portion, up to 35%, relating to the value of orthodontic appliances,” but the invoices contained no allocation between the services and device. ...
EC summary
Belle-Isle v. MNR, 64 DTC 5041, [1964] CTC 40 (Ex Ct), briefly aff'd 66 DTC 5100, [1966] R.C.S. 354 -- summary under Proceeds of Disposition
MNR, 64 DTC 5041, [1964] CTC 40 (Ex Ct), briefly aff'd 66 DTC 5100, [1966] R.C.S. 354-- summary under Proceeds of Disposition Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 13- Subsection 13(21)- Proceeds of Disposition The taxpayer disposed of depreciable property to a corporation controlled by him in consideration for the assumption of a mortgage and the issuance of common shares having a stipulated value that was substantially less than the amount for which they were sold shortly thereafter by the taxpayer. The proceeds of disposition of the depreciable property were found to approximate the fair market value of the property, as established by the subsequent transaction, rather than being based on the stipulated consideration. ...
TCC (summary)
British Columbia Transit v. The Queen, [2006] GSTC 103, 2006 TCC 437 -- summary under Subsection 153(1)
The Queen, [2006] GSTC 103, 2006 TCC 437-- summary under Subsection 153(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 153- Subsection 153(1) lease consideration not nominal because of property tax obligation The appellant leased a transit system to another municipal transit entity for rent of $1 per year, but with the lessee being obligated to pay municipal taxes imposed on the leased premises (which amounted to around $2 million per year). C Miller J noted that this obligation represented non-nominal consideration for the lease. ...
Decision summary
The Queen v. Leslie, 75 DTC 5086, [1975] CTC 155 (FCTD) -- summary under Subsection 85(1)
Leslie, 75 DTC 5086, [1975] CTC 155 (FCTD)-- summary under Subsection 85(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 85- Subsection 85(1) On the incorporation of a business the agreement purported to transfer net assets having a value of $5,078 and goodwill having a value of $20,222 in consideration of the issuance of $10,000 of treasury shares and a promissory note in the principal amount of $15,300. ... It was held that there was some consideration for the promissory note since the promissory note was not expressed in the agreement to be given for any part of the goodwill but merely for part of the balance of the purchase price of all the assets sold. ...
FCA (summary)
Greiner v. The Queen, 84 DTC 6073, [1984] CTC 92 (FCA) -- summary under Disposition
He noted (at p. 6078) that: "Those words appear to me to be sufficiently broad as to include an amount received as consideration for the surrender of rights that are thereby extinguished, in contrast with an amount received as consideration for rights that are 'transferred' and, as such, that remain in existence. ...
FCA (summary)
The Queen v. The Maritime Life Assurance Co., 2000 DTC 6402 (FCA) -- summary under Section 131
., the portion of premium revenues that were not retained in the segregated funds) were found not to be consideration for a taxable supply given that the fact that it managed the segregated funds did not necessarily imply that the segregated funds must be treated as paying consideration for those management services. ...
TCC (summary)
Krauss v. The Queen, 2009 DTC 1394 [at at 2155], 2009 TCC 597 -- summary under Subsection 74.1(2)
The Queen, 2009 DTC 1394 [at at 2155], 2009 TCC 597-- summary under Subsection 74.1(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 74.1- Subsection 74.1(2) The taxpayer and her son transferred real estate on a rollover basis to a partnership in consideration for Class A units of the partnership having a redemption value, subject to a price adjustment clause, of approximately $1.25 million for each of them. Several days later, the partnership issued Class C units to a family trust for consideration of $100. ...
TCC (summary)
Manrell v. The Queen, 2002 DTC 1222 (TCC), rev'd 2003 DTC 5225, 2003 FCA 128 -- summary under Disposition
The Queen, 2002 DTC 1222 (TCC), rev'd 2003 DTC 5225, 2003 FCA 128-- summary under Disposition Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Disposition The taxpayer and corporations controlled by him disposed of shares of three corporations engaged in manufacturing plastic moulds and caps and received, in addition to sale proceeds for the shares, lump sums (payable in instalments) in consideration for giving non-compete covenants. McArthur T.C.J. characterized the non-compete payments as consideration for the disposition of the right to compete with the purchaser, with the result that they represented capital gains. ...