Search - connection

Filter by Type:

Results 2291 - 2300 of 6318 for connection
TCC

Reeves v. The Queen, 2021 TCC 74 (Informal Procedure)

And, subsection 126(2) provides that, “[p]ersons are related to each other for the purposes of this Part [IX, which includes section 254] if, by reason of subsections 251(2) to (6) of the Income Tax Act, they are related to each other for the purposes of that Act.” [22] Correspondingly, paragraph 251(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act provides that, “... persons related to each other are…individuals connected by blood relationship, marriage or common-law partnership or adoption”. [23] Of these several types of connection, the only potentially relevant one vis-à-vis Ms. ...
FCTD

Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 639

Issue and Standard of Review [22] The only issue is whether the Decision is reasonable. [23] Subject to certain exceptions that are not present, the standard of review is presumptively reasonableness as described by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 [Vavilov]. [24] The word “reasonable” when used in connection with this Decision does not mean the same in law as it does in ordinary English. ...
TCC

Patrick v. R., [1998] 4 CTC 2108

In this connection, I have found that the Appellant’s evidence is lacking in precision. ...
TCC

Enstone v. R., [1998] 4 CTC 2665, 98 DTC 2045

He shall pay all taxes, rates, levies, insurance premiums, mortgages (principal and interest) and the cost of all reasonable and necessary repairs including repairs of a capital nature for and in connection with the real property. ...
TCC

Turcotte v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2103

The address 1554A is mentioned, but in connection with the use of an office attached to the principal residence. ...
TCC

Fitzpatrick v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2420 (Informal Procedure)

See also paragraph 139(1)(ae) of the Income Tax Act which includes as “personal and living expenses” and therefore not deductible for tax purposes, the expenses of properties maintained by the taxpayer for his own use and benefit, and not maintained in connection with a business carried on for profit or with a reasonable expectation of profit. ...
TCC

Lefrancois v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2615

In this connection, the Court finds the appellant was fully entitled to deduct from income the expenses claimed. ...
T Rev B decision

Murray Lorentz v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2044, 79 DTC 83

The item was also intended to reflect the cost of feeding and stabling horses which were used in part for pleasure and in part in connection with the cattle-raising operation. ...
T Rev B decision

Arichandra M Coomaraswamy v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2407, 79 DTC 355

. — In the further alternative, the appellant is entitled to the deductions permitted by division C in connection with the said rental property in the computation of the appellant’s taxable income. ...
T Rev B decision

A Schiel Construction Ltd, H S Holdings LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2426, 79 DTC 366

It was apparent in October of 1973, when Mrs Schiel resigned and severed her connection with Oldco pursuant to the agreement, that one of the joint ventures would be quite profitable. ...

Pages