Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

Filter by Type:

Results 531 - 540 of 8583 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Ruling

2006 Ruling 2006-0206021R3 F - Underground Exploration Program - New Mine & CEE

Favourable rulings issued in XXXXXXXXXX 2004 and XXXXXXXXXX 2005 with respect to this particular issue. ... Dans sa totalité, le Projet Souterrain nécessitera des investissements estimés à XXXXXXXXXX $. ... Ces mêmes questions ont également été l'objet de décisions anticipées rendues par notre Direction le XXXXXXXXXX 2005 (no. ...
Technical Interpretation - External

20 June 2006 External T.I. 2005-0149651E5 F - CEE / FEC

20 June 2006 External T.I. 2005-0149651E5 F- CEE / FEC Unedited CRA Tags 66.1(6) Principal Issues: In a given situation, where the exploration of a mining site starts up XXXXXXXXXX and costs must be incurred to make the site safe for the employees before further exploration can proceed, whether the costs related to making the site safe qualify as CEE? ... The Queen, 2005 DTC 55. 2005-014965 XXXXXXXXXX Marc LeBlond (613) 946-3261 Le 20 juin 2006 Monsieur, Objet: Qualification de certains travaux à titre de frais d'exploration au Canada La présente est en réponse à votre lettre du 1er septembre 2005 dans laquelle vous nous demandez nos commentaires concernant l'application de la Loi de l'impôt sur le revenu dans la situation décrite ci-après. ... La situation Votre société a entrepris récemment des travaux préliminaires d'exploration à l'égard d'une "ressource minérale ", au sens prévu au paragraphe 248(1), sur une propriété minière située au Canada (ci-après la "Propriété") XXXXXXXXXX. ...
Technical Interpretation - External

18 October 2012 External T.I. 2012-0436181E5 - Part IV Tax / Denied Dividend Refund

You describe that the amounts of Aco’s and Bco’s refundable Part I tax, Dividend Refund, Part IV tax and net Part I tax owing for the Particular Taxation Year (assuming that Aco and Bco file their income return (hereinafter “T2”) for the Particular Taxation Year within the time frame specified in subsection 129(1)) are as follows: Aco Bco Refundable Part I Tax $ XXXXXXXXXX $ XXXXXXXXXX Dividend Refund $ XXXXXXXXXX $ XXXXXXXXXX Part IV Tax Payable $ XXXXXXXXXX $ XXXXXXXXXX Net Part I Tax Owing $ XXXXXXXXXX $ XXXXXXXXXX However, Aco misses the filing deadline specified in the preamble of subsection 129(1) for its T2 for the Particular Taxation Year to obtain a Dividend Refund for that year. ... For Tawa's 2005 Taxation Year, the Minister reduced Tawa’s RDTOH account balance by the amount of the denied Dividend Refund. ... In our view, in the situation described above, the dividend-recipient corporation, Bco, would be liable to pay an approximate amount of Part I tax of $ XXXXXXXXXX (related to its taxable investment income of $ XXXXXXXXXX) and of Part IV tax of $ XXXXXXXXXX for the Particular Taxation Year, and, would be entitled to a Dividend Refund of $ XXXXXXXXXX for that year. ...
TCC

Bekhor v. M.N.R., 2005 TCC 443

Signed at Ottawa, Ontario, this 15th day of July 2005.     « Louise Lamarre Proulx » Lamarre Proulx, J.     ... Signed at Ottawa, Ontario, this 15th day of July 2005.     « Louise Lamarre Proulx » Lamarre Proulx, J.       ...   [40]     The appeal must be dismissed.     Signed at Ottawa, Ontario, this 15th day of July 2005. ...
FCA

Addison & Leyen Ltd. v. Canada, 2006 DTC 6248, 2006 FCA 107

As of the hearing of this matter in the Federal Court on March 29, 2005, the Minister had not dealt with that objection. ... Canada, 2005 FCA 393. (4) Judicial review of the decision to use section 160? ... Conclusion [81]            I would allow this appeal, set aside the order of the Federal Court dated March 29, 2005, and dismiss the Crown's motion to strike the application. ...
TCC

Thomas v. The Queen, 2005 DTC 1527, 2005 TCC 613

The Queen, 2005 DTC 1527, 2005 TCC 613 Docket: 2004-3353(IT)G BETWEEN: JOHN F. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 18th day of October 2005. "Lucie Lamarre" Lamarre, J. ... Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING:                      Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING:                        September 13, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT BY: The Honourable Justice Lucie Lamarre DATE OF JUDGMENT:                     October 18, 2005 APPEARANCES: Counsel for the Appellant: Paul Lefebvre Counsel for the Respondent: Charles Camirand COUNSEL OF RECORD:        For the Appellant:                    Name:                              Paul Lefebvre                    Firm:                                Weaver, Simmons LLP        For the Respondent:                     John H. ...
TCC

Bolduc c. La Reine, 2005 TCC 675 (Informal Procedure)

Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 26t h day of Oct ober 2005.       « Louise Lamarre Proulx » Lamarre Proulx J.       ...   [33]     As a result, the appeals are dismissed.   Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 26th day of October 2005. ... Her Majesty the Queen   PLACE OF HEARING:                     Montreal, Quebec   DATE OF HEARING:                       May 20, 2005   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT B Y :     The Honourable Justice Louise Lamarre                       Proulx   DATE OF JUDGMENT :                   October 26, 2005   APPEARANCES:   Counsel for the Appellant: Pierre Hémond     Counsel for the Respondent: Nathalie Labbé   COUNSE L OF REC ORD:   For the Appellant:       Name: Pierre Hémond     Firm: Brochet Dussault Lemieux Larochelle Sainte-Foy, (Quebec)     For the Respondent: John H. ...
FCTD

Currie v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 FC 733

Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 FC 733                                                                                                                                   Date: 20050524                                                                                                                              Docket: T-1413-04                                                                                                                         Citation: 2005 FC 733 BETWEEN:                                          GLENN CURRIE, DOUGLAS FILLMORE,                                     ANDREW MCAULEY AND VINCENT O'NEILL                                                                                                                                            Applicants                                                                            and                               HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA                     as represented by CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY                                                                                                                                         Respondent                                                         REASONS FOR ORDER STRAYER D.J. ... HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA as represented by CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY PLACE OF HEARING:                     Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING:                       May 5, 2005 REASONS FOR ORDER:                Strayer D.J. DATED:                                              May 24, 2005 APPEARANCES: Mr. ...
FCTD

Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Khan, 2005 DTC 5715, 2005 FC 398

Khan, 2005 DTC 5715, 2005 FC 398 Date: 20050322 Docket: IMM-7232-04 Citation: 2005 FC 398 Ottawa, Ontario, March 22, 2005 Present:           THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE GAUTHIER BETWEEN:                                                THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP                                                           AND IMMIGRATION                                                                                                                                             Applicant                                                                            and                                                          AZMAT ALI KHAN and                                                 DIANA ALEXANDRO BUSYLEVA                                                                                                                                       Respondents                                             REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1]                The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration seeks judicial review of the decision of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (RPD) granting refugee status to Azmat Ali Khan and his wife, Diana Alexandro Busyleva. [2]                Mr. ...                              [30]            If the RPD considered any grounds other than humanitarian grounds it specifically refers to in the last two paragraphs, it certainly failed to give proper reasons for its conclusion in that respect. ... No question is certified.                      "Johanne Gauthier"                                               Judge                            [1] I have applied the standard of correctness to this issue Harb v. ...
TCC

2159-2993 Québec Inc. c. La Reine, 2005 TCC 639

Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 25th day of November 2005.     "B. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 25th day of November 2005.       "B. ...

Pages