Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Results 11 - 20 of 115 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Did you mean?2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
TCC (summary)
A & D Holdings Inc. v.The Queen, 2006 DTC 2219, 2005 TCC 768 -- summary under A
A & D Holdings Inc. v.The Queen, 2006 DTC 2219, 2005 TCC 768-- summary under A Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 13- Subsection 13(21)- Undepreciated Capital Cost- A Property that the vendors sold to the taxpayer contained chromium and the vendors did clean up work until the problem of contamination in runoff water was resolved to the satisfaction of the City. ...
TCC (summary)
Richter & Associates Inc v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 92 -- summary under Paragraph 265(1)(f)
Richter & Associates Inc v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 92-- summary under Paragraph 265(1)(f) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 265- Subsection 265(1)- Paragraph 265(1)(f) trustee's own suit and litigation support activity were related The trustee in bankruptcy for a company ("Castor") which had essentially only engaged in investing in high-yield loans brought an action in its capacity of trustee for the Castor estate against the former auditors ("C&L") for $40 million in damages for breach of contract, and also began a "litigation support business" of providing assistance to most of the creditors (the "Participating Creditors"), including hiring professionals and experts, in connection with their action sounding in negligence against C&L for $800 million in damages. ... It is clear that the services and properties related to litigation support services and properties acquired by the Estate in order to carry on the Litigation Support Business are also benefiting the Estate in the pursuit of its own legal action against C&L. … In any event…[r]egardless of whether the Estate should have filed its GST return as the Estate or as a separate person, the respondent's liability to pay the ITCs to the Estate would not change. ...
TCC (summary)
Richter & Associates Inc v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 92 -- summary under Subsection 141.01(2)
Richter & Associates Inc v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 92-- summary under Subsection 141.01(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 141.01- Subsection 141.01(2) allocation between costs incurred by trustee in bankruptcy for bankrupt financial institution to provide litigation services to creditors, and costs incurred in connection with its action qua trustee The trustee in bankruptcy ("Richter") for Castor Holdings Ltd. ... Therefore, the costs of the litigation support services that the Estate enjoyed in prosecuting its own claim against C&L would not qualify for ITCs. … However, the portion of the services and properties in question that was acquired for the purpose of prosecuting the claims of the Participating Creditors would be considered to have been acquired in the course of commercial activities. … The allocation by the Estate of the use of its inputs between its taxable supplies and its other activities (exempt supplies) appears to me to be a fair and reasonable one and it complies with subsection 141.01(5).... ...
Decision summary
Pope & Ors v. R & C Commrs., [2012] UKUT 206 (Tax and Chancery Chamber) -- summary under Subsection 104(13)
Pope & Ors v. R & C Commrs., [2012] UKUT 206 (Tax and Chancery Chamber)-- summary under Subsection 104(13) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- 101-110- Section 104- Subsection 104(13) The son of the taxpayer, who was the beneficiary of his own life insurance policy, likely died in 1998 when he was abducted by Angolan rebels, but this was never conclusively established. ... A grant of letters of administration for the estate did not occur until 2005. ...
Decision summary
Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor, R (on the application of) v Commissioners for HMRC, [2016] UKSC 54 -- summary under Paragraph 241(4)(a)
Although s. 18(1) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 provided: Revenue and Customs officials may not disclose information which is held by the Revenue and Customs in connection with a function of the Revenue and Customs s. 18(2)(a)(i) provided that s. 18(1) did not apply to a “disclosure … made for the purposes of a function” of HMRC. ... (para. 25) In rejecting HMRC’s arguments that the disclosure was justified, he stated (at paras. 34-35): … [A] general desire to foster good relations with the media or to publicise HMRC’s views about elaborate tax avoidance schemes cannot possibly justify a senior or any other official of HMRC discussing the affairs of individual tax payers with journalists. [T]hat the conversation might have led to the journalists telling Mr Hartnett about other tax avoidance schemes …is far too tenuous to justify giving confidential information to them. … The fact that Mr Hartnett did not anticipate his comments being reported is in itself no justification for making them. ...
Decision summary
Binder v. Saffron Rouge, 2008 DTC 6112, 2008 CanLII 1662 (Ont. S.C.J.) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
.)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission The taxpayers were incorporating shareholders of a corporation. Although they realized at the time that a share issue in 2005 to a U.S. investor would cause the coproration to cease to be a Canadian-controlled private corporation (a "CCPC"), they did not realize that this change would disqualify their shares from the lifetime capital gains exemption. ...
TCC (summary)
Francis & Associates v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1146 [at at 3468], 2014 TCC 137 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i)
Francis & Associates v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1146 [at at 3468], 2014 TCC 137 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 152- Subsection 152(4)- Paragraph 152(4)(a)- Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i) taxpayers held to standard of wise and prudent law partner A review of a law firm's accounts in 2005 by its external accountant revealed various substantial errors for the 2002 to 2004 years. ...
FCA (summary)
Jentel Manufacturing Ltd. v. Canada, 2012 DTC 5031 [at at 6682], 2011 FCA 355 -- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development
Canada, 2012 DTC 5031 [at at 6682], 2011 FCA 355-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development The taxpayer, a producer of plastic containers, undertook a project to "improve the existing product to make it a smaller and significantly lighter storage system" (para. 9 of Statement of Appeal, quoted at para. 5). ... This recognition that thermoforming and injection moulding techniques and procedures were pre-existing (and therefore accessible to other professionals in the field), coupled with the fact that Jentel had previously used both methods and did not suddenly begin to use them in the 2005 fiscal year, supports the reasonableness of the judge's conclusion that Jentel was using an available, standard manufacturing process. ...
FCA (summary)
Canadian Forest Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Canada, 2017 FCA 39 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
Canada, 2017 FCA 39-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission foreign rectification order not dispositive The taxpayer’s Barbados and Cyprus subsidiaries paid amounts to the taxpayer in 2004, 2005 and 2006 as dividends and then, following CRA proposals to assess the dividends, obtained rectification orders from the applicable Barbados and Cyprus courts declaring that the amounts instead were loans to it (or otherwise gave rise to indebtedness). ... Moreover, since these foreign orders involve the appellant and its Foreign Affiliates and not the Minister, a third-party to the foreign proceedings, there is nothing to enforce against the Minister; homologation is therefore a non-issue. … However, Boivin JA further stated (at paras 19-20): I cannot agree … that pursuant to article 2822 C.c.Q. these foreign orders are dispositive and that the Minister has no choice under the ITA but to accept the dividends are actually loans because the orders from Barbados and Cyprus say so. ... These determinations are for the Tax Court judge to make, with a full evidentiary record at his or her disposal. … On this basis, he concluded that Lamarre ACJ should not have answered the Rule 58 question, and set aside her judgment and dismissed the Rule 58 motion before the Tax Court. ...
TCC (summary)
Canadian Forest Navigation Co. Ltd. v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 43, rev'd 2017 FCA 39 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
The Queen, 2016 TCC 43, rev'd 2017 FCA 39-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission foreign rectification orders are not binding on the Tax Court (but can be given weight) The taxpayer’s Barbado and Cyprus subsidiaries paid amounts to the taxpayer in 2004, 2005 and 2006 as dividends and then, following CRA proposals to assess the dividends, obtained rectification orders from the applicable Barbados and Cyprus courts declaring that the amounts instead were loans to it (or otherwise gave rise to indebtedness). ...