Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

  [7]                Two previous Allowable Business Investment Loss (ABIL) requests by the Applicant in relation to RMCF were denied in January of 2002 and 2003. ... MNR, (1997) 209 N.R. 392 (FCA).       FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                           T-353-07   STYLE OF CAUSE:                           Benjamin R. ... DATED:                                              August 17, 2009       APPEARANCES:   Mr. ...

Justice Near     BETWEEN: LANCE ROGERS Applicant and   CANADA REVENUE AGENCY Respondent   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT   [1]                This is an application under section 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 2002, c.8, s. 14 in the matter of a decision (the Decision) of an adjudicator from the Public Service Labour Relations Board in Board File 166-34-37434, dated November 19, 2008, where the Adjudicator determined he did not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Applicant’s grievance ... (Toronto: Butterworths, 2002) at pages 195-196, 219).   [20]            I agree with the Respondent that in Massip, above, the Federal Court of Appeal opened the door to indirect losses, but limited those losses to those that were inevitable. ... CANADA REVENUE AGENCY       PLACE OF HEARING:                     OTTAWA   DATE OF HEARING:                      OCTOBER 13, 2009   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT BY:                    NEAR J.   ...

  [7]                On October 17, 2002 the Applicant requested that the Minister exercise his discretion and appropriate the 1996 Overpayment to the 1999 and 2000 tax years pursuant to section 221.2 of the Act.   ... Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, at para. 26. […]   [49]            There, the Supreme Court considered the grammatical and ordinary sense of the words at issue, the scheme of the act under consideration, the legislative history and evolution of the provisions in issue and the purpose of the legislation ...   [50]            In Bell Express Vu Limited Partnership v Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, the Supreme Court held that it is necessary in every case for the court charged with interpreting a provision to undertake the preferred contextual and purposeful interpretation approach before determining if the words are ambiguous.  ...

The case law affirms that the overlooking or accidental omission must be by the Court, not by a party as noted in Khroud v Canada (M.C.I.), 2002 FCT 1157 para.12 where it states “the failure of a party to include available material does not give rise to jurisdiction to reconsider a decision finally disposing of the matter ... Canada (M.C.I), 2002 FCT 791 para. 3.   [22]            However, in the present case, the Applicant is representing himself; it is not due to an error of counsel that he was unable to appear in court. ... Mandamin” Judge   FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                           T-1003-10     STYLE OF CAUSE:                           CAMPBELL RIVER HARBOUR AUTHORITY and S/V “ACOR” ET AL.     ...

(emphasis added) [6]                The applicant became aware of the decision on June 5, 2003, when she received her 2002 Notice of Assessment. ... The statement also appears in the decision of the original Fairness Committee dated May 6, 2002. [10]            However, none of the documents submitted by the respondent is a demand or request for the applicant to file her 1997 tax return. ... The original decision of the Fairness Committee is dated May 6, 2002. ...

Justice Lemieux BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC Plaintiff and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT     1. ... At Quebec’s request, adjournment of the proceeding scheduled for October 1, 2002 on the ground that the principal Quebec witness, Luc Monty, was unable to testify for reasons relating to the tabling of the Quebec budget ... “François Lemieux” Judge         Certified true translation   Brian McCordick, Translator   APPENDIX A   A. ...

Stern for the period January 01, 2002 to December 31, 2002; 2)          An order for costs under Rule 400 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998; and 3)          Such further and other relief as this Court deems appropriate. [1]                The Applicant provided evidence that the Respondent Gerald L. ... STYLE OF CAUSE:                           THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and GERALD L. ... PLACE OF HEARING:                     VANCOUVER, B.C. DATE OF HEARING:                       17-MAY-2004 REASONS FOR ORDER:                MR. ...

I.   Background [2]   The Plaintiffs filed a Statement of Claim on March 4, 2019.   ... F-7, s. 11; 2002, c. 8, s. 19. 11 (3) Quiconque peut exercer à titre d’avocat ou de procureur à la Cour d’appel fédérale ou à la Cour fédérale, selon le cas, en est fonctionnaire judiciaire. ... F-7, art. 11; 2002, ch. 8, art. 19. [9]   The Plaintiffs, despite having had almost six months to do so, have never provided any evidence to this Court that the individual Plaintiff, Mrs. ...

HACHÉ   Applicants and   ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT       I.  ... Prothonotary Morneau considered the applicants' arguments, according to which it was necessary to hear the testimony concerning the alleged agreements between the parties dated 1990, 1997, and 2002, though which the Minister committed himself to permanently limiting the number of snow crab fishery licenses to 130. ... HACHÉ     PLACE OF HEARING:                     Montréal (Quebec)   DATE OF HEARING:                       November 25, 2008   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT:                           SHORE J.   ...

Je conclue ici que vu que le paragraphe 20 de la déclaration d’action introduit en quelque sorte l’historique qui est contenu aux paragraphes 21 à 23, il est requis ici par rapport au paragraphe 23 que les demanderesse apportent les précisions recherchées de manière à permettre aux défendeurs de comprendre, en fonction de la date du 9 mai 2002, la thèse de la partie adverse. [18]            Dans cet ordre d’idées, la règle 174 fait référence au fait qu’un acte de procédure doit contenir un exposé des « faits substantiels ».  ...     « Richard Morneau » Protonotaire   Montréal (Québec) le 16 janvier 2007 COUR FÉDÉRALE   AVOCATS INSCRITS AU DOSSIER   DOSSIER:                                          T-1856-06   INTITULÉ:    RAYMOR INDUSTRIES INC. ET AL parties demanderesses et CONSEIL NATIONAL DE RECHERCHES CANADA ET AL parties défenderesses LIEU DE L’AUDIENCE:                  Montréal (Québec)   DATE DE L’AUDIENCE:                 Le 9 janvier 2007   MOTIFS DE L'ORDONNANCE:     LE PROTONOTAIRE MORNEAU   DATE DES MOTIFS:                        Le 16 janvier 2007   COMPARUTIONS:   Me Brigitte Chan Me Robert H.C. ...