Search - 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖

Thus, in such a situation, the trust would no longer be a "testamentary trust" …. ...

Since … the loan from M Co is assistance that is required to be included in Prod Co's income under paragraph 12(1)(x), the conversion of the loan by M Co into shares of Prod Co at the end of the production would not engage the application of subsection 80(2). ...

CRA confirmed that, regarding the narrow issue of the FMV of the common shares immediately before the death of the taxpayer, given that the insurance share was retractable by the holder immediately before the death for the CSV, it would not be unreasonable to allocate the policy CSV to the insurance shares – so that the value of the common shares would not take the policy CSV into account. ...

On the other hand, if one unit has all the bedrooms and the other unit consists primarily of the kitchen and bathrooms and they are truly used as one unit, the CRA may be more likely to conclude that there is a single unit for purposes of the definition of "principal residence" …. ...

22 December 2005 External T.I. 2005-0151091E5 F- Allocation de retraite- retenue à la source-- summary under Paragraph 100(3)(c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Regulations- Regulation 100- Subsection 100(3)- Paragraph 100(3)(c) confirmation of RRSP deduction limit is not required from the employee for the portion of the retiring allowance that is eligible for deduction under paragraph 60(j.1) In response to a query as to whether the correspondent’s notice of assessment must be provided to the employer so that it can pay the retiring allowance amount into the individual’s RRSP without deductions at source – and whether that amount can be paid into a spousal RRSP or as a repayment of the individual’s home buyers' plan ("HBP"), CRA stated: [T]he employer is not required to withhold tax on the amount of the retiring allowance that it pays directly to an RRSP if the employer has reasonable grounds to believe that the premium is deductible under paragraph 60(j.1) or subsection 146(5) or (5.1) in computing the employee's income for the taxation year in which the retiring allowance is paid. ...

Consequently, subsection 83(2.1) would not apply to deem a capital dividend received by Ms Y … to be a taxable dividend. ...

Did the interest-free loan generate Part XIII tax and, if so, who had the obligation to collect and remit the tax – and how could it be collected? ...

. … Since Schedule I does not address this situation, the Payment is subject to subsection 106(1). ...

Had the Fund now held Opco directly, this would have been accomplished by incorporating a subsidiary (“MFC”), distributing relatively modest shareholdings in MFC to its unitholders sufficient to qualify MFC as a mutual fund corporation, amalgamating MFC and Opco so that Amalco MFC also qualifies as a mutual fund corporation, and then instigating the merger of Amalco MFC into the Fund under s. 132.2 – so that the former assets of Opco are now held directly by a REIT (the Fund). ...

2017 Ruling 2017-0699201R3- Cross-border Butterfly-- summary under Paragraph 212.1(1.1)(b) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 212.1- Subsection 212.1(1.1)- Paragraph 212.1(1.1)(b) application on 4-party exchange CRA ruled on a cross-border butterfly which entailed assets of the “Transferred Business” being transferred indirectly to a wholly-owned non-resident subsidiary (Foreign Spinco) of a non-resident public company (Foreign Parentco) or to a wholly-owned non-resident subsidiary of Foreign Spinco (Foreign Spinco Sub) – with a view to the shares of Foreign Spinco being dividended out to the shareholders of Foreign Parentco at the transactions’ completion. ...