Search - 深圳居住证 办理条件 最新政策

Results 31 - 40 of 2797 for 深圳居住证 办理条件 最新政策
Decision summary

Adecco UK Ltd & Ors v Revenue & Customs, [2018] EWCA Civ 1794 -- summary under Consideration

Adecco UK Ltd & Ors v Revenue & Customs, [2018] EWCA Civ 1794-- summary under Consideration Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Consideration consideration for temps included their remuneration The appellants ("Adecco") were employment bureaux supplying clients with temporary staff ("temps") who were not employees of Adecco. ...
Decision summary

Derrin Brothers Properties Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v A Judge of the First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) & Ors, [2016] BTC 10, [2016] EWCA Civ 15 -- summary under Subsection 231.2(3)

Derrin Brothers Properties Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v A Judge of the First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) & Ors, [2016] BTC 10, [2016] EWCA Civ 15-- summary under Subsection 231.2(3) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 231.2- Subsection 231.2(3) third party notices to UK accounting firm and banks did not require them to be given explanation why information required The Australian Tax Office ("ATO") made a request under Art. 27 of the UK-Australia Treaty of HMRC relating to its investigations of an Australian resident ("Gould") and his associates and clients, which suggested to it that a UK accounting firm ("Lubbock Fine") was providing nominee directors and shareholders to UK-incorporated companies to make it appear that their factual residence was outside Australia. ...
Decision summary

G E Financial Investments v.The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, [2021] UKFTT 0210 (Tax Chamber), ultimately aff'd [2024] EWCA Civ 797 -- summary under Article 4

G E Financial Investments v.The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, [2021] UKFTT 0210 (Tax Chamber), ultimately aff'd [2024] EWCA Civ 797-- summary under Article 4 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 4 a deemed US resident was not a US treaty resident A US company (“GEFI Inc.”) and UK company (“GEFI”) in the GE group formed a Delaware LP (“LP”) with GEFI Inc. as the 1% general partner and GEFI as the 99% limited partner. ... In my judgment, this is the correct approach as it takes into account the common feature or similarity of domicile, residence, citizenship etc, in the context of the Convention, ie that they are all criteria providing, in addition to the imposition of a worldwide liability to tax, a connection or attachment of a person to the contracting state concerned. Such an interpretation is consistent with Widrig and Vogel and Crown Forest which, as [HMRC counsel] submits, when properly understood in context is authority for the proposition that full or worldwide taxation is a necessary feature of the connecting criterion but is not sufficient of itself. ...
Decision summary

Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC, [2024] UKUT 152 -- summary under Article 12

Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC, [2024] UKUT 152-- summary under Article 12 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 12 Irishco’s purchasing a UK interest claim from Caymansco at a tax arbitrage price did not have Treaty-reduction as a main purpose BLM was a substantial Irish-resident investment company, which started acquiring proved claims in the administration of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ("LBIE" a UK resident) in 2011 and came to own 443 such claims. ... HMRC denied BLM’s refund claim on the basis of Art. 12(5) of that Treaty, which excluded the application of Art. 12 “if it was the main purpose or one of the main purposes of any person concerned with the assignment to take advantage of Article [12].” ... “It was appropriate for the FTT to have had regard to the fact that there were potential purchasers of the SAAD Claim for whom UK WHT would not have been an issue and for whom the UK-Ireland treaty would not have been relevant [e.g., UK purchasers with tax losses] who were prepared to pay a price higher than 80% of the interest on the SAAD Claim for reasons wholly unconnected to the UK-Ireland treaty” (para. 78). ...
Decision summary

Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC, [2024] UKUT 152 -- summary under Article 7(1)

Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC, [2024] UKUT 152-- summary under Article 7(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Multilateral Instrument- Article 7- Article 7(1) accessing Irish-UK treaty dividend-withholding reduction was not abusive given that not a treaty-shopping or conduit transaction BLM was a substantial Irish-resident investment company, which had been acquiring proved claims in the administration of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ("LBIE" a UK resident) since 2011. ... HMRC denied BLM’s refund claim on the basis of Art. 12(5) of that Treaty, which excluded the application of Art. 12 “if it was the main purpose or one of the main purposes of any person concerned with the assignment to take advantage of Article [12].” ... “It was appropriate for the FTT to have had regard to the fact that there were potential purchasers of the SAAD Claim for whom UK WHT would not have been an issue and for whom the UK-Ireland treaty would not have been relevant [e.g., UK purchasers with tax losses] who were prepared to pay a price higher than 80% of the interest on the SAAD Claim for reasons wholly unconnected to the UK-Ireland treaty” (para. 78). ...
Decision summary

Agence du revenu du Québec v. Structures GB Ltée, 2025 QCCA 134 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Structures GB Ltée, 2025 QCCA 134-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission corporate reorganization documents could not be rectified to correct for an unforeseen Pt. ... (Canada), so that the rectification order was reversed, the Court stated (at paras. 25, 29-30, 36, TaxInterpretations translation): If the agreement is consistent with what the parties agreed to but simply produces unforeseen tax consequences, due to an error by the tax planners in the design of the tax planning, rectification cannot be granted. The parties had not planned any specific entitlement [“prestation”] aimed at ensuring that Structures and the holding companies were connected throughout the 31 stages of the corporate reorganization of Structures. Mr. Côté, the tax specialist who conceptualized the reorganization, affirmed that maintaining connectedness was not the object of the transaction, which was to crystallize as much CGD as possible.... ...
Decision summary

Cussens & Ors v Brosnan, ECLI:EU:C:2017:881:Case C-251/16, [2017] BVC 61 -- summary under Subsection 274(4)

The Court stated (at paras 53, 60- 61): …[T]he case-law stemming from the judgment in Halifax does not require it to be established that the accrual of a tax advantage is the only objective of the transactions at issue. In order to determine the substance and real significance of the leases at issue in the main proceedings, the referring court may, in particular, take account of the purely artificial nature of those transactions and the links of a legal, economic and/or personal nature between the operators at issue …. Such aspects are capable of demonstrating that the accrual of a tax advantage constitutes the essential aim pursued, notwithstanding the possible existence, in addition, of economic objectives …. …[T]he leases had no commercial reality and were entered into with the aim of reducing the VAT liability on the sales of immovable property which they envisaged carrying out subsequently. ...
Decision summary

Haworth & Ors v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, [2025] EWCA Civ 822 -- summary under Article 4

Haworth & Ors v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, [2025] EWCA Civ 822-- summary under Article 4 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 4 the place of effective management of trusts for treaty tie-breaker purposes was in the UK even though their CMC might be in Mauritius The UK-resident taxpayers sought to avoid capital gains tax respecting the disposal of shares by family trusts of which they were the settlors by relying on a "Round the World" tax plan. ... If the trustees were appointed because it was appreciated that fulfilment of their responsibilities would cause them to take the decisions, the POEM of the trust might not be in the jurisdiction from which the trustees come. [Here] the role of the trustees in Mauritius was effectively pre-determined. [T]he settlors, albeit with the advice and assistance of advisers, decided to adopt "an overall single plan" and, to that end, exercised their powers to appoint the Mauritius Trustees for a limited period "in the confident expectation that they would implement the plan". ...
Decision summary

Canada (Attorney-General) v. Brogan Family Trust, 2014 ONSC 6354 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Brogan Family Trust, 2014 ONSC 6354-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission no obligation to notify Crown if tax liability which was relieved has not been assessed The respondent family trust obtained a rectification order, to permit trust distributions to minor grandchildren beneficiaries, on 26 November 2010, which was shortly after a sale of a business by the trust. ... In dismissing this motion, Ray J stated (at para. 13): I am not persuaded that… CCRA [sic] was affected by the order of McLean, J. [After citing Canada v. ... Richter & Associates, [2000] OJ No. 2073 (Ont SC) aff'd [2001] OJ No. 1087 (Ont CA)]. ...
Decision summary

Felty v. Ernst & Young LLP, 2015 BCCA 445 -- summary under Agency

Ernst & Young LLP, 2015 BCCA 445-- summary under Agency Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Agency presumption that law firm agreement binds client The appellant’s B.C. law firm retained Ernst & Young to provide her with U.S. tax advice in connection with negotiating a separation agreement with her husband. ... In finding that the appellant was bound by the engagement agreement, Newbury JA applied (at para. 38) the principle in Shaw, Salter & Plommer v. Phipps & Cosgrove (1926) 37 B.C.R. 184 “that as a general rule, solicitors will be taken to be contracting on behalf of their clients in the course of their practice.” ...

Pages