Search - 江苏苏美达轻纺国际贸易有限公司 关税政策 最新动态

In addition, the CCRA could pay Aco interest on the amount refunded at the prescribed rate … for a particular period determined under subsections 164(3) and 187(3)... ...

. … [Regarding, Art. 5(4)(e), w]hether an enterprise carries on an activity of a preparatory or auxiliary character through a server in a particular place must be determined on a case-by-case basis having regard to the business's activities as a whole. ...

However, with respect to the preferred shares of Investco owed by the Estate, while those shares also appear to satisfy the votes and value test, they do not satisfy the ownership requirement set out in (b) [of “excluded amount”] …. ...

. … In the above situation, Jcorp is a corporation controlled by the J Trust and would for the purposes of section 55, therefore, be related to the J Trust pursuant to subparagraph 55(5)(e)(iii). ...

CCRA indicated that the question of whether the payment of the “deferred salary” was of income turned on whether it was “similar to one of the items that must be included in computing a taxpayer's income for the purposes of the … Act”. ...

However … article 72 of the Decree and the absence of an employment contract or subordination relationship seem to indicate that the relationship between the creditor and the debtor of the “deferred salary” does not constitute an employer-employee relationship. ...

., a group sickness or accident insurance plan (“GSAIP”), a private health services plan (“PHSP”), or a group term life insurance policy (“GTLIP”)) allows for the provision of benefit coverage to such individuals – although a GTLIP may only provide benefit coverage to current and former (including retired) employees. ...

Consequently, the requirement in paragraph 107.4(1)(i) would be satisfied …. ...

Consequently … no limited partnership loss can be deducted by Opco in computing the ASPA so as to reduce the amount to be added to its income under subsection 34.2(1). ...

CRA noted that the FMV of the property in the RRSP normally would have been included in the deceased annuitant’s income under s. 146(8.8) but here, there was no inclusion of such amount in the final return because the executor was unaware of the RRSP – and that return now was statute-barred. ...