Search - 水晶光电 行业地位 发展趋势

Results 71 - 80 of 800 for 水晶光电 行业地位 发展趋势
Decision summary

Livent Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, 128 OR (3d) 225, 2016 ONCA 11, rev'd in part 2017 SCC 63 -- summary under Negligence, Fiduciary Duty and Fault

Deloitte & Touche, 128 OR (3d) 225, 2016 ONCA 11, rev'd in part 2017 SCC 63-- summary under Negligence, Fiduciary Duty and Fault Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Negligence, Fiduciary Duty and Fault auditors liable for failure to detect the company’s own fraud effected through its senior management A negligent audit by an auditing firm (“Deloitte”) of a Canadian public corporation (“Livent”), in which Deloitte failed to discover that senior management was fraudulently misstating the financial statements, was found by the trial judge to have resulted in damages to Livent, so that Deloittte was liable to the receiver-manager for Livent. ... In rejecting this submission, Blair JA noted (at para. 113) that the rationale for such an illegality (or ex turpi causa ”) defence “was to avoid “damage to the integrity of the legal system,” whereas this concern did not arise here as “the actual fraudsters will not profit from their wrongdoing and have not evaded criminal sanction…[n]or will Livent profit from the wrongdoing” (para. 156). ...
Decision summary

Slate Management Corporation v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 ONSC 4216 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Slate Management Corporation v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 ONSC 4216-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission a generalized intent to achieve a s. 88(1)(d) bump was a sufficient basis to rectify in order to redo an amalgamation A purchaser (“SCC”) used a newly-formed AcquisitionCo (“GTA”) to acquire a Target (“HCC”). ... Hainey J noted (at para 13): [T]his is not a case in which tax planning has been done on a retroactive basis. ...
Decision summary

Barker v Baxendale Walker Solicitors (a firm) & Anor, [2017] EWCA Civ 2056 -- summary under Section 10

Barker v Baxendale Walker Solicitors (a firm) & Anor, [2017] EWCA Civ 2056-- summary under Section 10 Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Interpretation Act- Section 10 “is” implied “or becomes” Before going on to find that a tax solicitor was negligent in not warning that his interpretation of s. 28(4)(d) of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 (including the meaning to be accorded to “is” and “at any time”) might be incorrect, Asplin LJ stated (at para. 46): Furthermore, I do not share the Judge's concerns about the need, on Mr Barker's construction, to imply "or becomes" into paragraph (d) or to construe "is" in (d) in a way which means that it has to apply at all times throughout the life of the trust. Paragraph (d) is intended to apply in relation to any person whether in (a), (b) or (c). ...
Decision summary

Re 5551928 Manitoba Ltd., 2018 BCSC 1482 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

., 2018 BCSC 1482-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission resolution for incorrectly calculated capital dividend rectified to reflect intention to clean-out CDA The petitioner, a Manitoba corporation with 24 shareholders, passed a resolution on November 20, 2015 that recited that “the company has a capital dividend account of the amount of $298,092”, declared a dividend in that amount “from the Company’s Capital Dividend Account pursuant to Subsection 83(2),” and directed the filing of a capital dividend election “in order to have the rules set forth in Subsection 83(2) apply to the full amount of the dividend.” ...
Decision summary

The Trustees of the Morrison 2002 Maintenance Trust & Ors v Revenue and Customs, [2019] EWCA Civ 93 -- summary under Tax Avoidance

The Trustees of the Morrison 2002 Maintenance Trust & Ors v Revenue and Customs, [2019] EWCA Civ 93-- summary under Tax Avoidance Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Tax Avoidance Three “Scottish Trusts” exercised their put to sell shares of a listed public company to trusts (the “Irish Trusts”) with similar terms for the shares’ cost base of £4.5M; and the Irish Trusts sold the same shares eight days later to Merrill Lynch for £14.3M, who then sold the shares into the market. ... Newey LJ stated (at paras. 56-57) that he agreed with the First-tier Tribunal: that the sale to Merrill Lynch "sufficiently corresponded to the scheme as planned" and it "would be extraordinary if the application of the Ramsay approach could be defeated by the sale being to brokers rather than to the market by brokers on behalf of the Irish Trustees" …. ...
Decision summary

Pyxis Real Estate Equities Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 ONCA 65 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Canada (Attorney General), 2025 ONCA 65-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission capital dividends were agreed to be paid in amounts that overlooked a CDA deficit: no rectification A plan was implemented for successive capital dividends to be paid up a chain of corporations so that the individual who was the ultimate shareholder could have a tax-free receipt of $1.4 million. ... …The corporate resolutions that were signed accurately reflect the agreement. ...
Decision summary

PepsiCo, Inc v Commissioner of Taxation, [2024] FCAFC 86, aff'd [2025] HCA 30 -- summary under Payment & Receipt

PepsiCo, Inc v Commissioner of Taxation, [2024] FCAFC 86, aff'd [2025] HCA 30-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt there can be no payment by direction unless there is an antecedent obligation by the creditor to the third party A U.S. company (PepsiCo) entered into an “exclusive bottling appointment” (“EBA”) with an independent Australian bottling company (the “Bottler”) pursuant to which an Australian subsidiary of PepsiCo (the “Seller”) sold concentrate to the Bottler and PepsiCo granted the Bottler the right to use the Pepsi and Mountain Dew trademarks in connection with its sales of the soft drinks. Before finding that the payments made by the Bottler to the Seller were not derived by PepsiCo, so that the latter could not be subject to the Australian withholding tax on trademark royalties paid to a non-resident, Perram and Jackman JJ stated (at para. 40): It is well established that a direction by a creditor to a debtor to pay a third party constitutes a payment to the creditor. Nevertheless, it is also recognised that there can be no payment by direction unless there is an antecedent monetary obligation owed by the Bottler to PepsiCo/SVC…. ...
Decision summary

Narich Pty. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Pay-roll Tax, [1984] BTC 8019 (PC) -- summary under Payment & Receipt

Commissioner of Pay-roll Tax, [1984] BTC 8019 (PC)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt indirect receipt of wages An argument was rejected to the effect that fees received by employees of a company were not wages because they were collected directly from clients of the company. ...
Decision summary

Parkside Leasing Ltd. v. Smith, [1985] BTC 25 (HC) -- summary under Payment & Receipt

Smith, [1985] BTC 25 (HC)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt receipt only when cheque deposited Interest paid by cheque was not received on the date that the cheque was received. ...
Decision summary

Minsham Properties Ltd. v. Price, [1990] BTC 528 (Ch. D.) -- summary under Payment & Receipt

.)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt mere addition of accrued interest not payment Although "there can be no doubt that a book entry can constitute payment" (p. 540), in the case of an informal loan from the taxpayer's parent corporation to the taxpayer, the mere addition of accrued interest to the principal owing by the taxpayer to the parent did not constitute payment. ...

Pages