Search - 枣庄市市中区 智博公考 地址 电话

Results 13481 - 13490 of 13541 for 枣庄市市中区 智博公考 地址 电话
TCC

Apte v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2145 (Informal Procedure)

At 11 % interest, an increased expense of $6,600 is very close to the loss reported in each of the three years. ...
TCC

Macleod v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2223 (Informal Procedure)

Appeals allowed. 1 At all relevant times, the Appellant was employed under contract by the province of On tario to assist in the production of various publications, etc. and appears to have worked at the offices of various Ministries. 2 A TD-1 form is generally provided to an employee by an employer to be completed for the purpose of providing the employee’s basic personal tax exemptions and other relevant infor mation to permit the employer to properly calculate the source deductions to be submitted to Revenue Canada. 3 Exhibit R-2. 4 ^he amounts referred to are those listed in the Appellant’s Exhibit A-4. 5 > Sheffield v. ...
TCC

Scamurra v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2658 (Informal Procedure)

. /?., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2832 (T.C.C.), a decision of my colleague Bowman, at paragraph 18, in the factual background, he said:...Ms. ...
TCC

Morency v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2024, 98 D.T.C. 2228

As regards the appellant's appeal, counsel for the appellant said he agreed there had been an appropriation of funds in the amount of $7,000 but argued that there was no appropriation of funds in the amount of $35,000 because the issue of capital stock to the appellant was a mistake. 19 Counsel for the appellant referred to Lord, Sasseville and Bruneau, Les principes de l'imposition au Canada, Wilson & Lafleur, 10th ed., and in particular to paragraph 4.3.1.5, pp. 81 and 82, titled [TRANSLATION] “False statement or omission made knowingly”: [TRANSLATION] Thus, in Thibault v. ...
TCC

Glenex Industries Inc. v. R., 97 D.T.C. 291, [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2217

Scott Davidson. 13 The Respondent called one witness, an evaluation expert Mr. ...
TCC

Marcoux (D.) v. M.N.R., [1991] 1 CTC 2643, [1991] DTC 485

During the first day of the resumption of the hearing of these appeals, the appellant Pierre Daneau, who was not represented by counsel, as I noted earlier, indicated that he wished to withdraw the part of his appeals dealing with the " income tax” element of each of the four assessments but that he wanted to pursue his appeals with respect to the assessment of penalties. ...
TCC

Aylward v. R., 97 DTC 1097, [1997] 2 CTC 2748 (TCC)

After three years Ronald Aylward and Fabian Aylward talked about making Ronald Aylward a shareholder at some time in the future to the extent of 10- 15 % and the wages paid to him would be the same as those paid to Fabian Aylward. ... The phrase used in subsection 7(1) is: (7) Subject to subsection (1.1), where a corporation has agreed to sell or issue shares of the capital stock of the corporation There is no further definition of the term “agreed”. ...
TCC

Fehrenbach v. MNR, 95 DTC 860, [1995] 1 CTC 2602 (TCC)

Therefore in 1981 when the unit was used for 71 days, 25 of which were personal and 46 of which were business, the formula application was: 46 over 71 x 100 = 64.78 per cent of expenses deductible for business or $5,865.42 out of the total expenses of $9,023.73. ... & 3. (a) Gaining or producing income from a business and (b) Personal or Living Expenses In order for the appellant to be successful under heading (a) above, he must be able to satisfy the Court on a balance of probabilities that the expenses were incurred "for the purpose of gaining or producing income from a business" within the meaning of paragraph 18(l)(a). ...
TCC

Mercille v. The Queen, docket 91-2196-IT-G

Rayner & Keeler Ltd. (No. 2) 4, at p. 935, defined the requirements of issue estoppel as:... (1) that the same question has been decided; (2) that the judicial decision which is said to create the estoppel was final; and (3) that the parties to the judicial decision or their privies were the same persons as the parties to the proceedings in which the estoppel is raised or their privies... ... It will not suffice if the question arose collaterally or incidentally in the earlier proceedings or is one which must be inferred by argument from the judgment. [...] ...
TCC

Industries S.L.M. Inc. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1996] 2 CTC 2572, 96 DTC 3215

.: Dissension reigned in 1979 among the four shareholders of Les Industries S.L.M. ... According to the Minister, S.L.M. artificially or unduly created a loss of $ 1,000,000. ...

Pages