Search - 教職 奨学金免除

After noting that NR-Beneficiary was subject to taxation under the Barbados Income Tax Act, 1968 on its “income from sources outside Barbados … only to the extent a benefit is obtained in Barbados from that income in the form, among others, of a remittance of money or an importation of property,” i.e., on a “remittance basis,” CRA indicated that NR-Beneficiary qualified as a resident of Barbados, i.e., as “a person must be subject to the most comprehensive form of taxation as exists in the relevant contracting state”: That is because, even if, under the law in force in Barbados, the taxation of the Trust Income may be deferred until a benefit is obtained in the form of a remittance of money or an importation of property in Barbados, it is our understanding that the NR-Beneficiary remains, nonetheless, “liable to tax” in Barbados in respect of its worldwide income. ...

. … For CEWS purposes, when the payment is added by the employer, which is an eligible entity, to the basic salary or wages included in each paycheck of an eligible employee, we will consider that the eligible entity has paid the payment to an eligible employee in respect of the same week as the related salary or wages are paid. ...

. … [T]he employees' travel is therefore not for the purpose of travelling away from the municipality and, where applicable, the metropolitan area where the employer's establishment was located. ...

In this regard, the Directorate noted that decisions such as Clibetre and Orlando indicate that “where requested changes to elements of the taxpayer’s return of income are denied, and there is no change to the tax payable previously assessed … there has been no ‘reassessment’ of tax by the Minister,” and such denial is instead “simply a notification that a reassessment has not been done” (“even if the notification is titled a ‘Notice of Reassessment’.”) ...

18 February 2022 Internal T.I. 2020-0836351I7- 212(1)(d)/Copyrights/Trademarks/XXXXXXXXXX-- summary under Subparagraph 212(1)(d)(vi) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 212- Subsection 212(1)- Paragraph 212(1)(d)- Subparagraph 212(1)(d)(vi) onus on CRA to allocate between exempt and taxable royalties – but not bound by licence agreement allocation Royalties were payable by Canco to a non-resident for the right to use copyright and trademarks in connection with the design, manufacturing and sale of products in countries in a particular region. ...

The Directorate stated: [W]here an OEO Rebate is paid by an OEO Dealer to a unitholder in a trust, in the [above] circumstances … it is likely that the OEO Rebate would be considered to be in respect of the activities of the trust or in respect of an expense of the trust. ...

The Directorate stated: [W]here an OEO Rebate is paid by an OEO Dealer to a unitholder in a trust, in the [above] circumstances … it is likely that the OEO Rebate would be considered to be in respect of the activities of the trust or in respect of an expense of the trust. ...

Nonetheless, a Quebec general or limited partnership has many of the characteristics typically associated with legal personality such as being able or subject to suing or being sued in its own name, and having a separate patrimony – and CRA has “previously stated that the existence of a separate legal personality alone is generally not sufficient to distinguish certain foreign partnerships from Canadian partnerships.” ...

The Directorate indicated that FA4 appeared to have two separate businesses- a debt portfolio business, and a business of providing services to other foreign affiliates in the group – given inter alia that its services were mostly to other foreign affiliates (in contrast to the arm’s length customers of the debt portfolio business) and thus not principally services rendered to FA4’s own debt portfolio business. ...

16 April 2024 Internal T.I. 2023-0964831I7- Guaranteed payments to non-resident athletes-- summary under Subparagraph 115(1)(a)(i) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 115- Subsection 115(1)- Paragraph 115(1)(a)- Subparagraph 115(1)(a)(i) guaranteed salary payments received by a US-resident member of a Canadian team while not in Canada were not taxable in Canada A resident of the US, who had entered into a 6-year employment contract (covering years 20X1 to 20X6) with a Canadian team, suffered a serious injury in the 20X3 season but, pursuant to a guaranteed payment clause in his contract, continued to receive full salary for the remaining contract term notwithstanding that he ceased playing for that team – and was released by that team in 20X4 and hired by a US team in 20X5. ...