Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Results 161 - 170 of 797 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
5 December 2012 Internal T.I. 2012-0439301I7 F - Reassessment beyond the normal reassessment period -- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii)
…Paragraph 96(1)(a)[‘s] … presumption that a partnership is a separate person … does not apply for the purposes of section 152.... Furthermore …., under civil and common law, a partnership … is simply the relationship that exists between persons or partners who carry on a business in common for profit. ... The debt of the partnership is owed by the partners …. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
24 September 2020 Internal T.I. 2020-0841041I7 - Normal reassessment period - provincial tax -- summary under Subsection 152(4)
. … [W]here a trust files a T3 return and does not report having a permanent establishment or income in a particular Agreeing Province … the trust has reported nil income with respect to the particular province or territory. Furthermore, the resulting Notice of Assessment or notice of no tax payable is considered to include a notice of no tax payable in respect of the Agreeing Province. … Accordingly … the federal assessment constitutes a Notice of Assessment or notification of provincial or territorial tax for all Agreeing Provinces. ... This view is consistent with … Aubrey Dan Family Trust …. Words and Phrases agreeing province ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
30 May 2019 Internal T.I. 2019-0806761I7 - Late filing of 88(1)(d) designation -- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii)
After quoting from Nassau Walnut to the effect that a late designation was acceptable where the situation “ does not raise the spectre of retroactive tax planning,” the Directorate stated: [I]f the CRA has the ability to reassess the Taxpayer’s Part I income tax return for year-end #1 pursuant to subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii) with respect to its disposition of the … US shares … the Taxpayer’s late-filed designation request could be considered. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
30 May 2019 Internal T.I. 2019-0806761I7 - Late filing of 88(1)(d) designation -- summary under Paragraph 88(1)(d)
After quoting from Nassau Walnut to the effect that where the Minister changes the provision under which the taxpayer’s income is computed and the taxpayer then seeks a deduction under the new provision, that request “ does not raise the spectre of retroactive tax planning,” the Directorate then stated that here: [I]f the CRA has the ability to reassess the Taxpayer’s Part I income tax return for year-end #1 pursuant to subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii) with respect to its disposition of the … US shares … the Taxpayer’s late-filed designation request could be considered. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
15 December 2014 Internal T.I. 2012-0445361I7 F - Remboursement de frais de déménagement -- summary under Subsection 2(1)
15 December 2014 Internal T.I. 2012-0445361I7 F- Remboursement de frais de déménagement-- summary under Subsection 2(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 2- Subsection 2(1) criteria for determining “ordinarily resides” under s. 62 (coterminous with “ordinarily resident” under s. 250(3)) Before indicating that the question of whether the reimbursement of expenses of selling a residence at Location 1 in Canada, which had continued to be held by an employee after his relocation to a job abroad at Location 2, could be treated as a taxable benefit if such residence was sold at the time the employee was relocated again to another location and position abroad at Location 3, turned on whether he should be considered to ordinarily reside at Location 2, CRA indicated that the terms "ordinarily reside" and "ordinarily resident" have the same meaning and that “the notion of ‘ordinarily reside’ relates more to everyday life than to the permanent nature of the situation,” and then listed the following indicators as to whether a taxpayer "ordinarily resides" at a particular new location: • the relocation of the taxpayer and the members of his or her household with their belongings, furniture and other items in their household to the new location. • the availability of the former residence, that is to say if it was sold, rented, or if it has been advertised for sale or rent (if the taxpayer is the owner), or if the lease was terminated (if the taxpayer is the lessee). • the chosen residence at the new location accords with the ordinary lifestyle and needs of the taxpayer (for example, if the taxpayer would be able to live in the new residence for an indefinite period or if instead it is a hotel room or a room in a friend’s home). • the transfer of banking services of the taxpayer and the taxpayer's other financial arrangements (including insurance policies) from the old to the new location. • changing the taxpayer’s driver’s licence and registration certificates for non-commercial vehicles (to satisfy the requirements of the new location or to report the new residence address). • a change in health care coverage to the new location. • the transfer of certain services from the old to the new location (e.g., subscriptions to newspapers or magazines, cable, internet, and telephone services). • the transfer of social relationships and other interests, from the old to the new location (such as participation in recreational, social, political or religious activities, and membership in personal or professional organizations). ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
28 October 2014 Internal T.I. 2014-0529981I7 - Allocation of partnership loss to a former partner -- summary under Subsection 80.01(6)
After noting a current GAAR review by Aggressive Tax Planning, the Directorate stated that LeCavalier " supports the application of GAAR… where the debt parking rules … were considered to have been misused or abused. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
12 January 2017 Internal T.I. 2016-0636911I7 - Standby Charge - PST and the cost of an automobile -- summary under Subsection 6(7)
After noting that “ Redclay [indicated that] ‘ was payable’ requires any GST/HST or PST actually paid pursuant to a vehicle purchase or lease contract to be included in the definition of cost for the purposes of subsection 6(2),” CRA indicated that under ETA s. 153(4)(c) “the GST/HST paid is not reduced because of an exemption [as referred to in s. 6(7)] but is reduced because of a calculation of the GST/HST base,” and the same analysis appeared to apply in the PST provinces. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
8 March 2018 Internal T.I. 2017-0724351I7 - Disability tax credit - lab tests as therapy -- summary under Paragraph 118.3(1)(a.1)
After noting that “the weekly blood tests in this case would likely be considered an activity that would be included in the time spent administering therapy” since the “weekly blood tests were required to ensure that the proper Phe level was being maintained,” the Directorate stated: It is … a question of fact whether the determination of a specific activity, for example a weekly blood test, can be included in the time spent administering therapy as described in paragraph 118.1(1)(a.1) of the Act. … What would be considered essential to one person’s impairment may not be considered essential to another. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
23 November 2023 Internal T.I. 2020-0850381I7 - Article V(4) of the Canada-U.S. Treaty -- summary under Article 5
Accordingly … “three months” generally means the aggregation of the number of days in three months. ... Thus, preparation time generally would not be counted towards the three month testing period. … Regarding standby time, i.e., “generally a temporary pause from operation that could be caused, for example, by severe weather, or shortage of labour,” it stated: Such temporary interruption should not change the status that the installation or drilling rig or ship in question is being utilized in the business. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
17 February 2014 Internal T.I. 2013-0498121I7 - Follow up to XXXXXXXXXX -- summary under Subsection 116(3)
After finding that there was no exemption for the diplomat in Art. 34 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations from the s. 162(7) penalty as the property " was not held on behalf of the sending State as part of the mission," nor was there any exemption for the child, CRA stated that "you may wish to consider exercising discretion in assessing the penalty given that….there was a loss on the property. ...