Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Results 13481 - 13490 of 13523 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
TCC

Leung v. MNR, 91 DTC 1020, [1991] 2 CTC 2268 (TCC), rev'd 93 DTC 5467 (FCTD)

Orkin & An. (1935, A.D. 18).) It is inappropriate to speak about "reducing" a "thought" or reducing a mental process. ...
TCC

Kaiser v. The Queen, 95 DTC 13, [1994] 2 CTC 2385 (TCC)

& F. 85 at page 144 (U.K. H.L.):...the only rule for the construction of Acts of Parliament is, that they should be construed according to the intent of the Parliament which passed the Act. ...
TCC

Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. R., 97 DTC 422, [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2593 (TCC)

This right has been recognized as an inherent attribute of the ownership of land since the earliest times as reflected in the maxim, “[c] ujus est solum, ejus est usque ad coelum et ad inferos [“to whomsoever the soil belongs, he owns also to the sky and to the depths”] (Butler v. ...
TCC

Stanley v. M.N.R., docket 95-1612-UI

Margeson" J.T.C.C. [1]         See the procedure outlined in R. v. ...
TCC

Gupta v. The Queen, docket 96-1024-IT-I (Informal Procedure)

I lost in excess of $150,000 + loss in currency depreciation in Canada since then. ...
TCC

Bennett v. The Queen, docket 97-248-IT-I (Informal Procedure)

The question is whether it also covers an arrangement of the type set out in the definitions of RRSP and RRIF in the Income Tax Act. [21] The definition of RRSP includes, in subparagraph (b) (iii), "... a deposit with a branch or office, in Canada, of... ...
TCC

9010-7020 Québec Inc. v. M.N.R., docket 97-1557-UI

Erich Klein, Revisor [1]           See Alexander v. M.N.R., [1970] Ex. ...
TCC

Jacob Pete v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2001, 91 DTC 204

S-53 called the Little Pine Community Counselling Services Society” and this society is not an Indian within the meaning of the Indian Act. ...
TCC

Kenneth Sommers v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2451, 91 DTC 656

As was stated in Evidence in Civil Cases, Sopinka and Lederman, Butterworth & Co. ...
TCC

Taillefer v. Minister of National Revenue, [1996] 1 CTC 2081, 95 DTC 462

The corporation Taillefer also benefitted from the non-payment of the sum of $21,000 that a related corporation by the name of Taillefer & Associés Incorporée could have required in respect of rent for the use of their premises by the corporation Taillefer during 1987. ...

Pages