Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Results 13011 - 13020 of 13528 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
TCC

Peter H. Albertin v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2715 (Informal Procedure)

.: Peter H. Albertin, the appellant, has appealed an income tax assessment for the 1994 taxation year on the basis that his mother-in-law Aleksandra Rybotycka (“Mrs. ...
TCC

Tania Linsenmeier v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2770 (Informal Procedure)

.: This appeal was heard on August 8, 1996 at Ottawa, Ontario pursuant to the Informal Procedure of this Court. ...
TCC

McEntyre Estate v. R., [1997] 2 CTC 2472, 97 DTC 245

This will confirm that from January 1- December 31, 1992, you will manage the portfolio yourself and that no fee will be payable to Touche, Thomson & Yeoman Investment Consultants Ltd. ...
TCC

Wells v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 2118

[7] and Rudolph Wolff & Co. v. Canada®, [8] and concluded that, applying the principles set out there, the exclusion of prison inmates from the class of persons eligible to receive the tax credits was not discrimination contrary to section 15 of the Charter. ...
TCC

Posocco v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 2877

.), and more particularly to the words of Robertson, J.A. at pages 5416, 5417 and 5419, the following portions of which I quote: The standard of care laid down in subsection 227.1(3) of the Act is inherently flexible. ...
TCC

Ron Miller Realty Ltd. v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 2892, 98 DTC 1201

Balance Sheet As at May 31, 1986 (unaudited) Income Commissions 362,542 Interest 103,969 Other 8,000 474,511 Expenses Bad debt expense 830 Bank charges and interest 502 Commissions 7,000 Depreciation 1,628 Legal fees 7,400 Salaries 17,000 Sundry 1,580 35,940 Net income before provision for income taxes 438,571 rhe onus of proof of error in the amount of the determination rests on the appellant. ...
TCC

Vincelli v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 2904, 98 DTC 1235

Vincelli had incurred in 1989 business investment losses aggregating $163,296 [$136,756 + $26,540] in respect of two loans made to Pre-Fur Canada Inc. ...
TCC

Ferguson v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 2963

On this basis, the Court calculates the Appellants’ gains as follows: Net received $101,068.88 Cost-30,554.48 $ 70,514.40 2 On this basis, each Appellant gained $30,257.20. ...
TCC

Ellis v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 3030

I will not read the questions since the headings speak for themselves, namely: Vision, Walking, Speaking, Mental Functions, Hearing, Feeding & Dressing and Elimination. ...
TCC

Dufour v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2741

Section 248 of the Act defines “self-contained domestic establishment” as follows: “self-contained domestic establishment” “self-contained domestic establishment” means a dwelling house, apartment or other similar place of residence in which place a person as a general rule sleeps and eats... ...

Pages