Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Total: $4,700 Available investment tax credit: $4,700 x 20% = $940 In computing his income tax payable for 1988, the appellant deducted an investment tax credit of $745.89 and a refundable portion of the credit in the amount of $77.65. ...

. ° On the second page of the reconstructed document apparently purporting to be a copy of the 1989 taxation year notice of assessment, the number 485 appears under a column entitled “LINE ON RETURN". ...

You are reminded that you must report this income for tax purposes — and that you may offset this income with interest paid by you in taxation year 1989. ...

However, it is not very difficult to reconstruct the figures on which the assessment was probably based: 115 x $150 $17,250 $14,000 x $7,800 = $6,330 $17,250 The figure is the fraction of the maximum amount of weekly payments which would otherwise have been made in 1990, that is $7,800, which half the selling price of the house, that is $14,000, represents of the total amount of weekly payments, that is $17,250, which would otherwise have been made during the 115 weeks during which the periodic payments were suspended. ...

In Words & Phrases the word ’’with" is described as being "at the same time". ...

Cash & Term Deposits $1,038,785 Balance of Sales Receivable (note 2) $411,098 Accrued Interest Receivable $18,668 Investment in Subsidiary (note 3) $335,671 Due from Shareholder $9,993 Loan Receivable $521,924 The appellant’s evidence, combined with evidence of his chartered accountant, Lawrence Rubinovich, was that the disposition of the shares of the corporation was not, due to oversight, disclosed in the appellant’s 1981 tax return but was disclosed in the 1983 return. ...

So in May & Butcher v. The King, where the suppliants agreed to purchase from the Crown all its surplus tentage "at such price as should be agreed upon between them as the quantities of tentage became available for disposal and were offered for purchase", the House of Lords held there was no concluded contract. ...

("Sunwrights"); (b) in the 1985 taxation year, the appellant received a loan or became indebted to Sunwrights in the amount of $208,400 for the purpose of purchasing from Sunwrights, royalty contracts issued to investors; (c) the loan or debt was not made or did not arise in the ordinary course of Sunwrights’ business nor was the lending of money part of its ordinary business; (d) the loan or debt does not fall within the exclusions noted in subparagraphs 15(2)(a)(ii) to (iv) of the Income Tax Act’, (e) on November 22, 1987, the appellant transferred the royalty contracts back to Sunwrights and Sunwrights reduced the loan or the debt to $ nil. ...

[1] 1989 ($24,550.81) 1990 ($23,327.03) 1991 no evidence 1992 no evidence 1993 $ 8875.94 Much of the appellant’s farm loss in 1991 was due to the purchase of a neighbour's herd or cattle in that year, the cost of which he deducted in computing income. ...

:—The appellant instituted appeals from assessments by the Minister of National Revenue (the “ Minister”) for the 1988 and 1989 taxation years. ...