Search - 微信撤回和删除的区别 官方

., 2003 DTC 5090, 2003 FCA 33-- summary under Section 17 Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Interpretation Act- Section 17 Section 4 of the Power Commission Act (Nova Scotia) provided that the Nova Scotia Power Commission " ("NSPC") "shall continue as a body corporate and as agent of Her Majesty The Queen in right of the province" under the name of "Nova Scotia Power Corporation. ...

" Furthermore, PTAQ failed to establish "that it exercised monthly financial monitoring and control of expenditures… that it funded " (para. 48), and "the fundraising documents… indicated that VPT was conducting the fundraising activities on its own behalf" (para. 50). ...

. … The facts that CU and CUH intended to use both the ATCOR/Forest transactions and the normal course dividends to achieve their tax avoidance objective, that they had the ability to ensure that all the transactions would occur, and that all the transactions did indeed occur as intended are sufficient to constitute them all part of a common law series for the purposes of subsection 55(2). ...

It was reasoned that the mere holding of inventory does not constitute a use of the property for an income-producing purpose in the context of considering a conversion of depreciable property to inventory (or vice versa) – whereas inventory should be considered to be income-producing property in the context of a conversion of personal-use property to inventory, or vice versa. ...

Sharlow JA stated (at para. 13): In my view, there has been in this case a transmission of the liability of the Taxpayer Trust to another person by "other means" – which I take to include the termination of the existence of the taxpayer. ...

Sharlow JA stated (at para. 13): In my view, there has been in this case a transmission of the liability of the Taxpayer Trust to another person by "other means" – which I take to include the termination of the existence of the taxpayer. ...

. … In my view, the interpretation of the contracts that is more consistent with the language of the contracts and the undisputed facts is that [such] payments were consideration paid by Amex to Costco, either for Costco entering into the Co-Branding Agreement, or specifically for the exclusivity provision. ...

. … As a matter of law it does not follow that, because the solicitor-client relationship is generally one of agency, all financial obligations incurred by a lawyer while providing legal services are incurred as agent of its clients. ...

. … While holding an ATP may exempt one from the application of the criminal law, it is not an “exemption” as contemplated by fiscal legislation…. ...

A submission of the appellant that he should not be liable for the unremitted GST of the company because the Minister took too long to assess (over 10 years), was rejected as being inconsistent with Addison & Leyen. ...