Search - 屯门 安南都护府

After agreeing with Pamel J below that such documents were part of the court file and thus accessible to the public under Rule 26 unless a confidentiality order was obtained, Montigny JA went on to reject the taxpayer’s submission (in reliance on Gernhart) that making the certified record public as a matter of course violated section 8 of the Charter, stating: Anyone engaging the courts in an action … must expect that large parts of his or her private life will become publicly accessible. … Far from transmitting confidential information without his consent and without informing him, it was rather at Mr. Rémillard's own request that the Minister transmitted the relevant documents to the Court Registry. … … Mr. Rémillard could have … requested the Court to issue an order to protect the confidentiality of certain information contained in the documents transmitted. ...

In fact, another public company (“Inco” – the 25% minority shareholder) made a subsequent offer that was accepted by DFR, thereby triggering the payment by it of the break fee. ... Falconbridge was carrying on its business when it negotiated the Merger … Agreement[s], … which provided for the fees in dispute. … The … Fees were ancillary business income received by Falconbridge in the course of earning income from business. ... The Queen, 2021 TCC 63 under s. 9 – compensation payments. ...

Gagné JCA stated: First, the ordinary meaning of the words "rights of the secured creditor …" refers to all the economic rights of the secured creditor securing the obligation. There is nothing in the text of [Reg.] 2201(2)(a) … to limit these rights to the real property rights of the secured creditor [as argued by the Caissse]. … Second, the legislator was careful to add "including guarantees …” … The word "guarantees" must be taken in its broad sense, which includes suretyship. … Third, the [Finance] Explanatory Notes to the Regulations support this interpretation. … In rejecting a further argument of the Caisse that the Reg. was contrary to “the rule prohibiting the granting of pure discretion by Regulation,” she stated that the Reg. was not purely discretionary and, in fact, its meaning “can easily be determined by applying the modern method of interpretation.” ... Caisse Desjardins de Limoilou, 2020 QCCA 1612 under Reg. 2201(2)(a) and Statutory Interpretation – Regulations/Statutory Delegation. ...

The documentary evidence … does not give any indication that Mr. Chad … intended, in conducting the FX Activities, to achieve a profit/loss amount great enough to offset the $240,000 fee, which was a significant expense …. Thus … the intention of Mr. Chad … in implementing the Trades, was not to earn a profit …. ... The King, 2024 TCC 142 under s. 3(1) – business, and General Concepts- Sham. ...

10 February 2020- 11:56pm Productions GFP – Federal Court declines request for judicial review of a CAVCO reversal of a preliminary ruling Email this Content The appellant (“GFP”) requested a preliminary opinion from the Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO) as to the eligibility for the Canadian film or video production tax credit of a proposed production that would be in the form of a quiz contest but where the points would not matter and the focus would be on the participants being funny. ... In dismissing GFP’s application for judicial review, Pentney J stated: … [I]t is clear that the opinion provides only a preliminary indication, based solely on the information provided by the producer, and that the final decision is based on an assessment of the actual production itself. … There is nothing in the evidence to suggest that the decision was not made in good faith, that it constituted an abuse of power or that it otherwise violates the objectives of the legislation. … … I accept that in view of the architecture of the system … those who want a certificate must spend money to embark on a production, with no guarantee that they will receive the benefit of a tax credit. ... Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1613 under Reg. 1106(1) – excluded production- (b)(iii). ...

28 January 2020- 11:51pm Muir – Tax Court of Canada finds that s. 160 did not apply to moneys transferred subject to an informal arrangement to discharge liabilities of the transferor Email this Content A professional corporation sold all its assets for $1.2 million, with most of this sum being applied at closing to pay off corporate liabilities, but with the balance of $124,000 being paid to the corporation’s dentist shareholder (Ms. ... He stated: [I]t appears her patients and the Corporation’s creditors would have had legal rights to trace any of the monies involved had the Corporation transferred it to her for any other purpose …. … I do not accept that it was the intention of Parliament or … Livingston to have section 160 apply in circumstances where CRA not only wasn’t but could never be … in any different position whatsoever as a result of the transfer. ...