Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数

Filter by Type:

Results 581 - 590 of 8047 for 哈尔滨到北京 公里数
FCA (summary)

The Queen v. Johnson & Johnson Inc., 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA) -- summary under Certainty

Johnson & Johnson Inc., 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA)-- summary under Certainty Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Certainty preferred interpretation should meet a minimum level of cetainty In finding that a federal sales tax refund should not be considered to have been receivable by the taxpayer until the Minister had given some public irrevocable indication thereof, Hugessen J.A. stated (p. 6128): "The decision creates rights and starts time running and it is as much in the public interest as in that of those immediately concerned that there be a basic minimum of certainty as to when it is made and what it is. ...
Decision summary

MacKinlay v. Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL) -- summary under Subsection 103(1)

Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL)-- summary under Subsection 103(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 103- Subsection 103(1) "salary" to partner is a profits distribution In discussing the nature of a partnership, Lord Oliver stated (p. 900): "A partner working in the business or undertaking of the partnership is in a very different position from an employee... ...
Decision summary

MacKinlay v. Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL) -- summary under Paragraph 96(1)(a)

Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL)-- summary under Paragraph 96(1)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 96- Subsection 96(1)- Paragraph 96(1)(a) Lord Oliver rejected a finding of the Court of Appeal that a firm of accountants could be regarded as a "notionally distinct entity" in order to assess the purpose of expenditures incurred by it in reimbursing the relocation expenses of its partners. ...
Decision summary

MacKinlay v. Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL) -- summary under Paragraph 96(1)(f)

Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL)-- summary under Paragraph 96(1)(f) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 96- Subsection 96(1)- Paragraph 96(1)(f) "salary" to partner is part of profits division Lord Oliver stated (p. 589) that "if, with the agreement of his partners, [a partner] pays himself a 'salary', this merely means that he receives an additional part of the profits before they fall to be divided between the partners in the appropriate proportions. ...
Decision summary

MacKinlay v. Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL) -- summary under Section 96

Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL)-- summary under Section 96 Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 96 partner salary is a draw In discussing the nature of a partnership, Lord Oliver stated (p. 900): A partner working in the business or undertaking of the partnership is in a very different position from an employee... ...
FCTD (summary)

Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6373, [1992] 2 CTC 86 (FCTD), aff'd on other grounds 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA) -- summary under Exempt Receipts/Business

Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6373, [1992] 2 CTC 86 (FCTD), aff'd on other grounds 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA)-- summary under Exempt Receipts/Business Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 9- Exempt Receipts/Business A federal sales tax refund was taxable income given that the receipt was linked to the taxpayer's income-earning process (the price at which the taxpayer sold its products included the federal sales tax, although the taxpayer felt it had no responsibility to pass on the amount of the refund to its customers). ...
FCTD (summary)

Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6373, [1992] 2 CTC 86 (FCTD), aff'd on other grounds 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA) -- summary under Expense Reimbursement

Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6373, [1992] 2 CTC 86 (FCTD), aff'd on other grounds 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA)-- summary under Expense Reimbursement Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 9- Expense Reimbursement A federal sales tax refund was taxable income given that the receipt was linked to the taxpayer's income-earning process (the price at which the taxpayer sold its products included the federal sales tax, although the taxpayer felt it had no responsibility to pass on the amount of the refund to its customers). ...
SCC (summary)

Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd. v. Royal Bank of Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 187 -- summary under Subsection 49(3)

Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd. v. Royal Bank of Canada, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 187-- summary under Subsection 49(3) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 49- Subsection 49(3) Major J. noted, with respect to a clause in a lease that gave the lessee the unilateral right to compel the lessor to sell helicopters to the lessee at their reasonable fair market value, that the giving of initial notice by the lessee 120 days prior to the expiry of the lease could not qualify as an "exercise" of the option (irrespective of how the giving of notice was labelled), given that the exercise of an option must lead to a binding contract of a purchase and sale. ...
TCC (summary)

Francis & Associates v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1146 [at at 3468], 2014 TCC 137 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i)

Francis & Associates v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1146 [at at 3468], 2014 TCC 137 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 152- Subsection 152(4)- Paragraph 152(4)(a)- Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i) taxpayers held to standard of wise and prudent law partner A review of a law firm's accounts in 2005 by its external accountant revealed various substantial errors for the 2002 to 2004 years. ...
EC summary

MNR v. E.H. Pooler & Co. Ltd., 62 DTC 1321, [1962] CTC 527 (Ex. Ct.) -- summary under Income-Producing Purpose

Pooler & Co. Ltd., 62 DTC 1321, [1962] CTC 527 (Ex. Ct.)-- summary under Income-Producing Purpose Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(a)- Income-Producing Purpose TSX fine non-deductible The taxpayer, which carried on business as a stock broker, was required to pay a fine to the T.S.E. as a result of one of its vice-presidents inducing other member firms to open up margin accounts in the names of clients of the taxpayer who subsequently were prosecuted in respect of their trading activities in the stock of a mining company. ...

Pages