Search - 司法拍卖网 人民法院

This will confirm that from January 1- December 31, 1992, you will manage the portfolio yourself and that no fee will be payable to Touche, Thomson & Yeoman Investment Consultants Ltd. ...

[7] and Rudolph Wolff & Co. v. Canada®, [8] and concluded that, applying the principles set out there, the exclusion of prison inmates from the class of persons eligible to receive the tax credits was not discrimination contrary to section 15 of the Charter. ...

.), and more particularly to the words of Robertson, J.A. at pages 5416, 5417 and 5419, the following portions of which I quote: … The standard of care laid down in subsection 227.1(3) of the Act is inherently flexible. ...

Balance Sheet As at May 31, 1986 (unaudited) Income Commissions 362,542 Interest 103,969 Other 8,000 474,511 Expenses Bad debt expense 830 Bank charges and interest 502 Commissions 7,000 Depreciation 1,628 Legal fees 7,400 Salaries 17,000 Sundry 1,580 35,940 Net income before provision for income taxes 438,571 … rhe onus of proof of error in the amount of the determination rests on the appellant. ...

Vincelli had incurred in 1989 business investment losses aggregating $163,296 [$136,756 + $26,540] in respect of two loans made to Pre-Fur Canada Inc. ...

On this basis, the Court calculates the Appellants’ gains as follows: Net received $101,068.88 Cost-30,554.48 $ 70,514.40 2 On this basis, each Appellant gained $30,257.20. ...

I will not read the questions since the headings speak for themselves, namely: Vision, Walking, Speaking, Mental Functions, Hearing, Feeding & Dressing and Elimination. ...

Section 248 of the Act defines “self-contained domestic establishment” as follows: “self-contained domestic establishment” — “self-contained domestic establishment” means a dwelling house, apartment or other similar place of residence in which place a person as a general rule sleeps and eats... ...

They were supplied by the firm Morel & Frères. Act- analysis In making her assessments, the respondent relied on ss. 3, 5(1) and 163(2) of the Act. ...

The difference is quite striking — over $1,000,000. I shall endeavour to set out briefly my views on how the costs should be awarded in these cases. ...