Search - 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查

., File No. 500-17-125795-230 (Quebec Superior Court)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission annulment ordered of two donations The plaintiff (the Foundation) received two donations, each of $70,000, from the defendant (Millenium) in July 2016 and July 2017. ...

Canada (Attorney General), 2008 DTC 6657, 2008 FC 1037-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt embedded royalty reduction was not an amount received The Alberta government granted a reduction in the royalties the taxpayer otherwise would have been required to pay to Alberta on condition that the taxpayer invest in an expansion of the Syncrude project. ...

Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCSC 994-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission taking back excess boot could not be rectified under the BCA provision for correcting “corporate” mistakes 627291 B.C. ... There has not been: (a) a breach of a provision of the BCA, a former Company Act or the regulations under any of them; (b) a default in compliance with the memorandum, notice of articles or articles of the company; and … (c) none of the following proceedings at or in connection with any of the following have been rendered ineffective: (i) a meeting of shareholders; (ii) a meeting of the directors or of a committee of directors; (iii) any assembly purporting to be a meeting referred to in subparagraph (i) or (ii); and (d) a consent resolution or records purporting to be a consent resolution has not been rendered ineffective. … [T]he mistake of not completing the Transaction in the most tax effective manner does not … fall within these subsections. ... Mayer J further found (at para 40 and 41): Even if the Greither Estate was seeking the remedy of equitable rectification, … I am not satisfied that the facts of this case would justify such relief…. ...

The Queen, 2022 TCC 29-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development presumption that a taxpayer satisfying the “how” SR&ED tests will also satisfy the “why” test The taxpayer (“Airzone”) provided comprehensive air quality monitoring services to government agencies, international organizations, and businesses. In connection with addressing the CRA denial of SR&ED claims for six of Airzone’s projects, Hogan J made a number of general observations, including that: The taxpayer is required to demonstrate satisfaction both of “how factors,” namely “that the work was carried out by way of systematic investigation or search through experiment and analysis of a hypothesis … [and the] results of the work must also be preserved” (para. 5) and also a “why factor,” namely “that the work was carried out to resolve technical uncertainties that could not be solved through standard procedures and methods” (para. 6). ... “[T]he ‘why factor’ cannot be so strictly applied that only large corporations that employ dedicated research staff can qualify for the SR&ED incentives … [as m]oving the goal post so far afield … would be contrary to the intention of Parliament” (para. 51). ...