Search - 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查
Results 3621 - 3630 of 3785 for 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查
FCTD
Grant Wilson v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 203, 96 DTC 6452
.: — Grant Wilson (the “Taxpayer”) appeals a reassessment of his 1978 Income Tax Return on the basis that the Minister of National Revenue (“Revenue Canada”) failed to reassess with due dispatch following a notice of objection as required by subsection 165(3) of the Income Tax Act, S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63 (the “Act”). ...
FCTD
William S. Hawkes, Appellant v. Her Majesty the Queen Respondent, [1997] 2 CTC 133, 97 DTC 5060
Procter & Gamble Co. (1985) 5 C.P.R.(3d) 417, 62 N.R. 364, at page 418 (N.R. 365) (F.C.A.). 2 [1996] 3 C.T.C. 74, (sub nom. ...
FCTD
Fuchs v. R., [1997] 2 CTC 246, 98 DTC 6560
Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration). (1991), [1992] 1 F.C. 133 (Fed. ...
FCTD
Garage Montplaisir Ltée v. Minister of National Revenue, [1998] 1 CTC 51, 96 DTC 6557
Pinard & Pinard (1974) Ltée (hereinafter “Pinard Ltée”) was founded in 1927. ...
FCTD
Gadbois v. Transport H. Cordeau Inc., [1998] 3 CTC 68
., granted advances totalling some $63,000 to Cordeau between February and May 1996. (...)? ...
FCTD
B P Petroles Limitée v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1979] CTC 174
Dans l’arrêt MNR v Goldsmith Bros Smelting & Refining Company Limited, [1954] S.C.R. 58; [1954] CTC 28; 54 DTC 1011, des frais légaux déboursés à défendre la compagnie contre une accusation de participation à une combine illégale ont également été adjugés comme étant déductibles. ...
FCTD
Her Majesty the Queen v. William a Perkins, [1978] CTC 389, 78 DTC 6290
MNR v Sissons, [1969] S.C.R. 507; [1969] CTC 184; 69 DTC 5152. 4 + Both parties referred to the following cases: MNR v Sissons, (already cited) Steeves v The Queen, [1976] CTC 470 aff’d [1977] CTC 325; 76 DTC 6269: 77 DTC 5414; The Queen v Woods, [1977] CTC 597; 77 DTC 5411. ...
FCTD
Russell Snow v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1978] CTC 480
I do not think it of any assistance in interpreting the words ‘“.. personal property... situated on a reserve.. ...
FCTD
Albrumac Oils LTD v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1977] CTC 29, 77 DTC 5041
(Cayzer, Irvine & Co, Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, page 491 ante.) ...
FCTD
Paul D Bowlen v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1977] CTC 531, 77 DTC 5433
No case was cited in which the meaning is discussed and, in the absence of any expression of opinion on it, I think it means what is referred to as "legal possession” by Lord Cottenham in Reid v Langlois (1849), 1 Mac & G 627 at 636; 41 ER 1408 at 1411, when he said: In one sense it [the document] is in his possession; but when possession for the purpose of production is spoken of, that is to say a right and power to deal with it, actual corporeal possession is not meant, but legal possession in respect of which the party is authorized to deal with the property in question. ...