Search - 制暴无限杀机 下载

The Queen, 2017 TCC 6 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development solving a challenge by trial and error did not qualify The taxpayer (“JTR”) undertook a project in 2008 (the “Fire Curtain Project”) and in 2009 (the “Manual Override Project”) to solve two problems that it had encountered in its business of designing, manufacturing and installing theatrical rigging. ...

The Queen, 2017 TCC 42 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development improving the process for repairing drains qualified The taxpayer, whose business was the repair of sewers and other drains from the inside rather than through excavation, undertook two projects to develop a single-use light mandrel (i.e., tube) to facilitate the installation of a sheath from inside the drains, and develop a process and equipment to install the sheath using a single access point from inside a building (through a cleanout and using pushing) rather than also from the street (using a manhole and pulling rather than pushing the mandrel). ...

The Queen, 2017 TCC 179 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development challenging project that applied only existing methods and techniques and entailed no hypotheses or much testing did not qualify Project 705 (the “Plant Sterols Beverage Project”) of the taxpayer, which carried on an energy drink business, sought to develop a beverage containing a mixture of 800 milligrams of plant sterols in a two-ounce format. ...

K & D Logging Ltd. v. The King, 2023 TCC 23-- summary under Subsection 20(21) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 20- Subsection 20(21) a s. 20(21) deduction cannot offset previously-recognized s. 17 income The taxpayer (K & D), which along with three other lenders, advanced funds in 1996 to a Uruguay farming corporation (Interan) of which the taxpayer was a 44% shareholder. ... On a CRA audit in 2009, a copy of the loan agreement was obtained by K & D from Uruguay, and it was determined that the loan was non-interest-bearing. K & D now argued that its deduction of an amount equal to the amounts it had previously recognized as interest income was authorized under s. 20(21). ...

The Queen, 2021 TCC 27-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development software development qualified as SR&ED The taxpayer provided a software platform to its clients to allow them to communicate remotely with their workers through wireless handheld devices used to access their employer’s computer system, in a great variety of applications. ... Agencies, found (at para. 194) that the taxpayer “was attempting to develop a new product (its platform) that would work seamlessly with a multitude of devices that used different operating software and ran on the various operating systems of [its] clients” and similarly (at para. 202) that the work undertaken by the taxpayer was "for the purpose of achieving technological advancements that would allow [it] to create a new and/or better product” found that the project had various challenging elements and that these challenges could not be resolved with routine engineering, so that it was instead required to experiment to come up with hypotheses of things that it could test also noted (at para. 209) the projects “were the same or similar to projects in respect of which the Appellant received grants from the National Research Council of Canada” Before allowing the appeal, he stated (at para. 208) … I have concluded that when the Appellant conducted the projects at issue, it formulated hypotheses specifically aimed at reducing the identified technological uncertainty, followed appropriate procedures on testing, including the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses, and maintained a detailed record of the hypotheses tested and results achieved as the work progressed. ...

The Queen, 2019 TCC 278-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development there can be reasonable certainty as to a successful outcome if the means of achieving it are uncertain The taxpayer (BMQ) used mobile concrete mixers to provide concrete at the site of construction or major repair projects. ...

Patricia & Daniel Blais O/A Satronics Satellites v The Queen, 2010 TCC 361, 2010 DTC 1271 [at 3904] (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Paragraph 212(1)(d) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 212- Subsection 212(1)- Paragraph 212(1)(d) payments to access satellite network were not rent or royalty The taxpayers sold individual customers access to the satellite network of an American firm ("NPS"). ... Saint John Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. ([1980] C.T.C. 352 (F.C.A.)) for the proposition that a "rent" connotes a grant of property that lasts for a fixed or determinable term, reverting thereafter to the grantor. ...

R & S Industries Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 75-- summary under Subsection 97(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 97- Subsection 97(2) taxpayer is not bound by the statement of boot set out in its s. 97(2) election form The taxpayer (“R & S”) transferred its business to a limited partnership, with a joint s. 97(2) election being made. The Minister reassessed R & S to include substantial amounts in its income as a result of the transfer. A request by R & S and the partnership to file an amended election was denied by the Minister and the Federal Court denied their application for judicial review of this decision. ...

R & S Industries Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 75-- summary under Subsection 171(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 171- Subsection 171(1) Tax Court had jurisdiction to consider change to description of consideration in s. 97(2) election form R & S Industries was unsuccessful in a motion to have the Federal Court direct CRA to reconsider its decision to not permit R & S Industries to file an amended s. 97(2) election form so as to change the agreed amounts. R & S then appealed to the Tax Court with a view to convincing the Court that the allocation of consideration between partnership-interest and non-partnership interest consideration set out on the (T2059) election form did not reflect the actual agreed allocation. CRA viewed this as an attempted end run around R & S’s inability to amend its election, and sought to have the appeal dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. ...

Bureau Barrister & Solicitor Incorporated v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 119-- summary under Paragraph 305(5)(b) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 305- Subsection 305(5)- Paragraph 305(5)(b) application granted based on registrant awaiting ITA assessments The appellant (“RBBSI”), a legal professional corporation for Mr. ... As well … procedural gaffes are not so egregious as to require or demand denial of this application. Regarding the test in s. 305(5)(b)(iv), he stated (at para. 18) that “there is a semblance of logic to … [RBBSI’s] position, sufficient to constitute reasonable grounds for appealing.” ...