Search - 制暴无限杀机 下载

Ashmore & Ors., [1995] BTC 406 (CA)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission intended terms not clear A deed for payment of £70,000 to charity, although it was intended to comply with an income tax requirement that the payment be for a period which might exceed three years, was executed in terms that ensured that the period would not exceed three years. ...

Adecco UK Ltd & Ors v Revenue & Customs, [2018] EWCA Civ 1794-- summary under Agency Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Agency a placement service providing non-employee temps to clients was not paying the temps’ compensation on the clients’ behalf An employment bureau (Adecco) introduced temporary staff ("temps"), who were not Adecco employees, to clients looking for a temporary worker to undertake an assignment, and if the temps accepted an assignment, Adecco paid them for the work they did for the clients – and collected those amounts plus a mark-up from the clients. ...

Pope & Ors v. R & C Commrs., [2012] UKUT 206 (Tax and Chancery Chamber)-- summary under Subsection 104(13) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- 101-110- Section 104- Subsection 104(13) The son of the taxpayer, who was the beneficiary of his own life insurance policy, likely died in 1998 when he was abducted by Angolan rebels, but this was never conclusively established. ...

Halsall & Ors v Champion Consulting Ltd & Ors, [2017] EWHC 1079 (QBD)-- summary under Negligence, Fiduciary Duty and Fault Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Negligence, Fiduciary Duty and Fault knowledge that advice – that investing in a tax shelter was a “no brainer”- was negligent, accrued when HMRC started investigating The claimants, who were non-tax solicitors, claimed that they had been negligently induced by the defendant accounting firm (“Champion LLP”) and an associated corporation (“Champion Consulting”) to invest in two tax schemes referred to as the "charity shell" and "Scion" film schemes. ... The fact that some of the companies succeeded and that some of the schemes went unchallenged by the Revenue is in my view irrelevant to the question of whether the reasonably competent tax adviser would have given an unconditional assurance that the charity shell scheme would work effectively. … [T]he failure … lay in not explaining that the valuation was pivotal to the success of the scheme and how this wide range of companies could all be valued at four times the initial subscription and this failure amounted to a breach of duty. ... With respect to the Scion film schemes, Moulder J found (at paras. 318, 319 and 335): … [I]t seems to me that the defendant did not advise that the claimant could lose more than their initial contribution. … The evidence is clear that the defendants did not point out the risk of the additional liability arising out of the outstanding loan and exposure to a tax charge in the event of the loan being written off. … [I]n my view the advice of Ms Molloy [an accountant and chartered tax advisor] that the prospects of success of the film scheme were 75% was outside the range open to her and amounted to a breach of duty being advice such as no reasonably well-informed and competent member of that profession could have given. ...

Travel Document Service & Ladbroke Group International v Revenue & Customs (Rev 1), [2018] EWCA Civ 549-- summary under Interpretation/Definition Provisions Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Interpretation/Definition Provisions where an anti-avoidance provision’s application depended on the purpose of being a creditor, that purpose was the one for holding shares which were a deemed loan A British taxpayer (TDS) used a total return swap to cause its share investment in a subsidiary (LGI) to be deemed to be a loan. ... That being so, I agree with Mr Ghosh [for HMRC] that the inescapable inference was that securing the advantage had become a main purpose of holding the shares. … He also rejected HMRC’s submission that "’main’ … means ‘more than trivial’," stating (at para. 48): A purpose can be "more than trivial" without being a "main" purpose. ...

Pope & Ors v. R & C Commrs., [2012] UKUT 206 (Tax and Chancery Chamber)-- summary under Paragraph 12(1)(c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 12- Subsection 12(1)- Paragraph 12(1)(c) The son of the taxpayers (Mr and Mrs Pope), who was the beneficiary of a life insurance policy which he had purchased on his own life, was abducted in Angola by rebels in 1998. ...

Adecco UK Ltd & Ors v Revenue & Customs, [2018] EWCA Civ 1794-- summary under Consideration Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Consideration consideration for temps included their remuneration The appellants ("Adecco") were employment bureaux supplying clients with temporary staff ("temps") who were not employees of Adecco. ...

& E. Commissioners v. Faith Construction Ltd., [1989] BTC 5121 (C.A.)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt receipt even though obligation to lend back In response to the proposed repeal effective 1 June 1984 of the zero rating of building alteration services, four building companies with existing contracts for building alterations arranged with their customers for payment by the customers before that date subject (in one case) to the condition that the building company would immediately lend back an equivalent sum, to be repaid as the work was done or subject (in the other case) to that money being paid into an account of the building company for release only as the work was done. ...

Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd., 2002 SCC 19, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 678-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission rectification available notwithstanding lack of due diligence on part of plaintiff The plaintiff (“Sylvan”) and the defendant (“Performance”) entered into an agreement respecting a golf course that gave Sylvan the option on the 18 th fairway for a specific residential development to be undertaken by it. ... The plaintiff must establish that the terms agreed to orally were not written down properly. … What is essential is that at the time of execution of the written document the defendant knew or ought to have known of the error and the plaintiff did not. ...

Ed Sinclair Construction & Supplies Ltd. v. MNR, 92 DTC 1163, [1992] 1 CTC 2218 (TCC)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt no payment by mere book entry Bowman J. stated: A mere bookkeeping entry in a loan account by itself does not constitute a taxable event unless there is something more, such as receipt. ...