Search - 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数

N 0 witnesses were called by either party and no explanation was given as to the discrepancy of $13,350 between the amount of the accounts ■ collected by Mrs. ...

Again, in concluding, he stated at page 212: On the whole I am of the opinion that. when, as a result of an appeal, the judicial authority set up has an assessment referred to it, the ministerial authority no longer has jurisdiction in the * matter and can no longer act until the court has passed judgment between the parties concerned. ...

& Cr. 359, Lord Chancellor Cottenham adopts the definition of Lord Eldon in Ex parte Pye (supra) and says, p. 367: “Lord Eldon says, it is a person ‘meaning to put himself in loco parentis; in the situation of a person described as the lawful father of the child’; but this definition must, I conceive, be considered as applicable to those parental offices and duties to which the subject in question has reference, namely, to the office and duty of the parent to make provision for the child. ...

After again considering all the facts and having regard to the inclusion of the profit in the accounts and the prospectus, we find that the profit was made in the ordinary course of the Company’s trade and therefore liable to tax. ’ In my opinion, that finding is one for which there was ample evidence. ...

C.R. 202 at 211; [1943] C.T.C. 281 at 290, which was stated as follows: “... a taxpayer cannot succeed in claiming an exemption from income tax unless his claim comes clearly within the provisions of some exempting section of the Income War Tax Act: he must show that every constituent element necessary to the exemption is present in his case and that every condition required by the exempting section has been complied with.’’ ...

I quote here certain statements made by Thomas J Collins for the year ending May 31, 1972, on the Bob-O-Link Farms report: Following the purchase of the “Silver Hills Ranch’’ in June, 1971, from M & A Davis, careful consideration has been given to the various alternatives open to us that would insure a successful farm operation.... ...

The final question is simply this — whether the words of paragraph 85(1)(e) of the Income Tax Act interpreted in their plain, ordinary and grammatical sense in context of the statutory scheme of section 85B reach out to bring within the tax net in 1969 the unearned premium reserve of $10,454,396 deducted in 1968. ...

On the other hand, that same Interpretation Bulletin considers any such payment as a " non-taxable capital receipt when the payment is a reimbursement of part or all of the tenant's capital cost of leasehold improvements". ...

Counsel for the respondent put great emphasis on the statements which appear in Article IV F of the plan to the effect that the employer's contribution is "on behalf of and as an absolute benefit for (the) member" and that such contribution ” shall be regarded as additional compensation paid to (the member)"; they likewise attach much importance to the fact that income taxes for participating employees are withheld not only from their wages but also from the employer's contribution. ...

On general principles then, the tax imposed by section 6A qualifies as a direct tax; see Canadian Industrial Gas & Oil Ltd v The Government of Saskatchewan, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 545. ...