Search - 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数

Canada (Attorney General), 2016 ONSC 2737-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission date of capital dividend declaration rectified to eliminate Part III tax The corporate applicant intended to distribute the applicable portion of a “capital gain” (likely, goodwill proceeds) from a business sale as a capital dividend. ... Before amending the directors’ resolution nunc pro tunc to change its date to November 1, 2012, Dunphy J stated (at paras. 7, 9): This case is quite unlike… Birch Hill … decided by me…[where] [t]he rectification sought would have materially re-ordered the transaction in ways that nobody had considered at the relevant time. There was a specific intention to allocate specific proceeds of a specific transaction to a specific tax account – the capital dividend account – to achieve a specific tax goal. ...

Gascon and Brown JJ (speaking for the majority) found (at paras 3-4): [W]e agree that Deloitte … should not be liable for its corporate client Livent Inc.’s increase in liquidation deficit which followed Deloitte’s provision of negligent services in relation to the solicitation of investment. ... Further to the first finding, they stated (at paras 53, 55): From August to October of 1997, the services which Deloitte provided to Livent — particularly its ongoing assistance in relation to the Press Release and the provision of the Comfort Letter — were undertaken for the purpose of helping Livent to solicit investment. ... Deloitte’s undertaking did not entitle Livent to rely on Deloitte’s services and representations for all possible purposes. … … Simply put, Deloitte never undertook, in preparing the Comfort Letter, to assist Livent’s shareholders in overseeing management; it cannot therefore be held liable for failing to take reasonable care to assist such oversight. ...

Canada (Attorney General), 2013 ABQB 489-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission superior court declines jurisdiction in tax dispute The federal Minister assessed the settlor of the appellant trust on the basis that the trust's taxable capital gain and investment income were taxable in his hands because the trust was a sham or invalidly settled, or because s. 75(2) applied. ... In dismissing an application to the Court to declare that the trust was valid, Nixon J adverted to the principle in Addison & Leyen Ltd v Canada, 2007 SCC 33 (CanLII), [2007] 2 S.C.R. 793, at para. 11 that "Judicial review should not be used to develop a new form of incidental litigation designed to circumvent the system of tax appeals established by Parliament and the jurisdiction of the Tax Court," and stated (at para. 66): The only dispute with respect to the validity of the Trust is with the CRA in relation to the payment of tax. ...

Canada, 2022 FCA 66-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt dividend was paid by way of retroactive set-off against shareholder loan account A shareholder loan balance that was owing by the taxpayer was eliminated through dividend declarations backdated to the three preceding years and paid by way of set-off. ... This set-off of debts had the same effect as if both debts had been paid by cross-payments (Eyeball Networks …). ...

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Novopharm Ltd. (1998), 161 DLR (4th) 1, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 129-- summary under Tax Avoidance Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Tax Avoidance In discussing E.I. De Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co., 227 U.S.P.Q. 223 (1985), Iacobucci J. stated (at p. 34) that in that case: "the unlicensed party actually manufactured the licensed article allegedly as the agent of the licensee, only then to 'purchase' the article from the licensee immediately upon its manufacture. ...

Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Receiver-Manager for Comanche Drilling Ltd. v. ... Unlike the Coopers & Lybrand case, funds were actually available to pay the remittances. ...

Will Kare Paving & Contracting Ltd. v. The Queen, 98 DTC 6203 (FCA)-- summary under Class 39 Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Regulations- Schedules- Schedule II- Class 39 The taxpayer purchased an asphalt plant with the expectation that it would sell up to 40% of the production of the plant to third parties and use the balance in its own asphalt paving business. ... Furthermore, the Coopers & Lybrand case (94 DTC 6541) had been properly applied in finding that the taxpayer's own use under contracts that were for working materials and not in respect of the sale of goods did not represent the purchase of "goods for sale or lease". ...

Canada, 2014 ONSC 7302, aff'd supra, rev'd 2016 SCC 56-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission continuing non-specific intention to maintain a tax neutral structure In order to facilitate the acquisition in 2002 of a hotel in Washington by a REIT ("Legacy") of which it was the manager, Fairmont Hotels Inc. ... As he was bound by Juliar, he did not have the "luxury" of following Graymar and, in any event, he did not think that Brown J in that case "has accurately described what happened in Juliar " (para. 41). ...

Patricia & Daniel Blais O/A Satronics Satellites v The Queen, 2010 TCC 361, 2010 DTC 1271 [at 3904] (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Paragraph 212(1)(d) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 212- Subsection 212(1)- Paragraph 212(1)(d) payments to access satellite network were not rent or royalty The taxpayers sold individual customers access to the satellite network of an American firm ("NPS"). ... Saint John Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. ([1980] C.T.C. 352 (F.C.A.)) for the proposition that a "rent" connotes a grant of property that lasts for a fixed or determinable term, reverting thereafter to the grantor. ...

Customs & Excise Commissioners, [2001] BTC 5083 (HL)-- summary under Supply Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Supply Fees which the Appellant received from credit cardholders were found to be consideration for a single supply of insurance services. After quoting the statement in Customs & Excise Commissioners v. Madgett, [1998] BTC 5440 that "a service must be regarded as ancillary to a principal service if it does not constitute for customers an aim in itself, but a means of better enjoying the principal service applied", Lord Slynn found (at p. 5090) that: "If one asks what is the essential feature of the scheme or its dominant purpose, perhaps why objectively people are likely to want to join it, I have no doubt it is to obtain a provision of insurance cover against loss arising from the misuse of credit cards or other documents. ...