THORSON, P.:—These are appeals against the appellant’s income tax assessments for its taxation years ending November 4. 1951, and November 2, 1952.

THORSON, P.:—The appellant’s appeal against its income tax assessment for 1950 is confined to the item of $1,506.50 for interest on unpaid tax which is included therein.

THORSON, P.:—Two separate proceedings were launched by the appellant herein. In the first it appealed against its excess profits tax assessments for the years 1948 and 1944 and in the second against its excess profits tax assessments for the years 1945, 1946

THE CHIEF Justice:—This appeal involves the ascertainment of the proper amount of excess profits for its 1947 taxation year of the respondent company Anaconda American Brass Ltd. pursuant to the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. By Section 2(1)

CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from a decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board dated August 19, 1952, which allowed in part an appeal by the appellant company in respect of its 1946 taxation year. On January 31, 1946, the close

Fournier, J.:—In this information the plaintiff, under Section 86(1) of the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1927, ce. 179, as amended, claims from the defendant the sum of $37,064.66 for sales tax said to be payable in respect of the manufacture

THORSON, P.:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board (1954), 10 Tax A.B.C. 61, dated February 3, 1954, dismissing the appellant’s appeals from its income tax assessments for 1949 and 1950.

CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board dated April 28, 1953 (8 Tax A.B.C. 247), dismissing the appellant’s appeal from an assessment to income tax in respect of the appellant’s taxation year ending February 28, 1948.

THORSON, P.:—In the first of these causes the appellant appeals against the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board (1953), 8 Tax A.B.C. 51, dated February 12, 1953, dismissing its appeal against its Income tax assessments for its 1947 and 1948 taxation

Le JUGE EN Chef:—Il s’agit d’un jugement de la Cour de l’Echiquier en vertu duquel la réclamation de l’appelante a été rejetée sans frais. Cette réclamation était pour une somme de $20,187.47, dont l’appelante voulait tenir l’intimé responsable en vertu de la