Cullen, J.:—This is an appeal from a decision of Mr. Goetz of the Tax Review Board, who upheld the appeal of Lehndorff Realty Developments Limited in respect of a reassessment for its 1974 taxation year. The issue in the appeal is the proper

Muldoon, J.:—On September 4, 1986, in this present cause, the Court pronounced the following order of certiorari and prohibition:

McNair, J.:—This is an originating motion of the applicant Bonnie E. Danielson, under section 18 of the Federal Court Act for the following relief:

Heald, J.:—We are all of the view that the learned trial judge did not err in concluding that the 1978 disposition of the 9.3 acres in issue in this appeal, was a disposition of a principal residence within the meaning of paragraph 54(g) of

Tremblay, T.C.J.:— This application for extension of time was heard on August 23, 1985 in the city of Toronto, Ontario.

Cullen, J.:—This action is an appeal against the disallowance by the Minister of National Revenue to the deduction of interest expense in the amounts of $75,898 for 1977, $254,629 for 1978 and $238,604 for 1979. The Minister treated the amounts of

Bonner, TCJ:—This is an appeal from an assessment of the appellant for an amount which the respondent found to be payable under the provisions of subsection 227.1(1) of the Income Tax Act. That provision reads:

Tremblay, TCJ:—This case was heard on September 28, 1984, in the City of London, Ontario.

Le juge Dubé:—La question à trancher est de savoir si la somme de $1,017,221 touchée par la demanderesse à titre d’honoraires pour services de gestion doit être incluse dans le calcul de son revenu pour l’année d’imposition 1974. La réponse est

Collier, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board: Adams v MNR, [1981] CTC 2543; 81 DTC 504 pursuant to which an income tax assessment by the Minister of National Revenue for the plaintiff’s 1978