Bernier, J.:—Il s’agit d’une requête en date du 13 octobre 1933, présentée à la Cour supérieure par le Procureur général du Canada, aux fins de faire condamner l’intimé en sa qualité de syndic à la faillite de la compagnie de courtiers Greenshields, à

LETOURNEAU, J.:—La compagnie intimée a demandé par pétition de droit que Sa Majesté le Roi aux droits de la Province de Québec soit déclarée lui devoir une somme de $1,380.86 pour un supplément de charges se rapportant à des communications téléphoniques à

Durr, C.J.:—The question, the answer to which, in my view, must determine this appeal, is whether or not the respondents, the Halifax Harbour Commissioners, fall within the description "‘occupier’’ within the meaning of sec. 357(1) of the Halifax charter. The

GRAHAM, Jd. :—The first question submitted is :—

" Whether the Halifax Harbour Commissioners are occupiers of any real property within the meaning of the City Charter (1931) ?”’

Davis, J.:—This appeal arises out of proceedings by way of. mandamus instituted by the respondents, who alleged that they were wrongfully deprived of certain land or an interest therein situate in Victoria, B.C., in consequence of fraud in the registration

MACDONALD, C.J.B.C.:—This is an appeal against an absolute order for mandamus obtained by a mining company commanding the Minister of Finance to forthwith ascertain and take into consideration the acquisition costs to the Pioneer Gold Mines of B.C. Ltd.,

LACROIX, J. Sess.:—L’accusé est traduit devant moi pour répondre à l’accusation suivante:

MACLEAN P.:—The suppliant is a company engaged in the business of dressing and dyeing furs, for others and not for its own account. By virtue of the Special War Revenue Act 1915, and amendments thereto, and within the periods

Middleton, J.A.:—These two cases are appeals in the nature of special cases from the decision of His Honour Judge Me- Gibbon, acting Judge of the County of Peterborough, pronounced on the 16th day of Feb., 1934, under the provisions of sec. 84 of

HUGHES, J.:—This action was brought against the respondent for the recovery of $499.48 alleged to be due as a debt for stamp taxes payable on sales of shares of stock under the Special War Revenue Act.