Denault, J.:— This is an appeal pursuant to Rule 336(5) of the Federal Court Rules by the defendant from the order of the Associate Senior Prothonotary Giles dated April 19, 1993, granting leave to the plaintiffs to file an amended statement of

Kennedy, J.:— This matter comes before me pursuant to the order of McDer- mid, J. pronounced March 4,1993 for the following relief:

A determination as to:

Rothstein, J.:— The issue in this case is whether the amount of $603,753.90 received by the defendant from his former employer Rio Algom Ltd. (formerly Rio Algom Mines Ltd.) on or about June 30, 1988, was a "retiring allowance” as that term

Marceau, J.A.:— This is an application for judicial review of a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada delivered from the bench on July 30, 1992, and confirmed in writing the following November. In that judgment, the judge dismissed the applicant's

Jerome, A.C.J.:—This appeal from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada, [1992] 1 C.T.C. 2148, 92 D.T.C. 1099, dated August 1, 1991 came on for hearing at London, Ontario on June 15, 1993. At issue in this appeal is the plaintiff's right to

Simpson, J.:—

McGillis, J. (orally):—The defendant Attorney General of Canada has applied for summary judgment in this matter under Rule 341 of the Federal Court Rules on the basis that the action raises no genuine issue to be tried.

Isaac, C.J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division, rendered on September 17, 1987, which allowed the respondent's appeal from a decision of the Tax Court of Canada. By that decision, the Tax Court had allowed the appellant's

Heald, J.A. (McDonald, J.A., concurring):—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division wherein the appeal of the respondent from the reassessments by the Minister of National Revenue in respect of the respondent's 1987, 1988 and