Dragon Construction Ltee v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2047, [1989] DTC 459 -- text

Rip, J.C.I.: —II s'agit d'appels par Dragon Construction Limitée ("Dragon"), l'appellante, des cotisations pour les années d'imposition 1982, 1983 et 1984 émises par le Ministre du revenu national, l'intimé, en vertu desquelles ce dernier refusa à l'appelante

Dale Pilling and Heather Pilling v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2037, 89 DTC 327 -- text

Rip, T.C.J.: — Dale Pilling and his wife, Heather Pilling, appeal from income tax assessments dated May 2, 1986, in which they were each assessed penalties and interest in the amount of $27,170.68 pursuant to subsection 227.1(1) of the

Woods Harbour Lobster Company Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2032, 89 DTC 303 -- text

Kempo, T.C.J.:— This appeal concerns the appellant's 1981, 1982, 1983 and 1984 taxation years. The essential issue raised was whether the appellant's operations represented “processing” within the meaning of sections 125.1 and 127 of the Income Tax

David Silverman v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2024, 89 DTC 307 -- text

Kempo, T.C.J.: —In this appeal concerning the appellant's 1979 taxation year, the essential issue was whether the notice of reassessment dated October 27, 1986 in respect of that year had been issued too late and was thereby statute-barred pursuant

Paul Durst and Maureen Durst v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2006, 89 DTC 337 -- text

Taylor, T.C.J.:—These are appeals heard on common evidence in Toronto on April 4, 1989 against income tax assessments for the years 1983, 1984 and 1985 in which the Minister of National Revenue disallowed a loss sustained from a trout raising operation,

Richard Boileau v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2001, 89 DTC 247 -- text

Lamarre Proulx, T.C.J.: —This concerns appeals made by the appellant in respect of the respondent's reassessment of the appellant's 1981 taxation year as well as in respect of the respondent's reassessment of the appellant's 1980, 1982 and 1983

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS