CCRA Annual Report to Parliament 2004-2005

Disclaimer

We do not guarantee the accuracy of this copy of the CRA website.

Scraped Page Content

Performance by Business Line

Rating our Performance

In the following sections, the performance of each business line is measured by how it achieved the expected results outlined in the strategic framework. For each expected result, we provide a performance summary, including the rationale for the performance rating in relation to the performance expectations in the Corporate Business Plan, and comment on year-over-year performance.

We use qualitative and quantitative indicators to determine our performance ratings. Survey results, statistical sampling and business operational data inform our performance assessments. Although we have made progress in developing robust performance measures, we need to make some of them more concrete and measurable. In these cases, we use the best information we have to make an assessment.

We rate the performance of our business lines on whether expectations, set in our corporate business plan, were met, mostly met or not met. The data quality ratings indicate whether they are based on good, reasonable or weak data. The table below, entitled Performance and Data Quality Ratings, defines these terms. Generally, our data collection systems provide reliable information.

The sections that follow provide more in-depth discussions of our performance in 2004-2005 for each of our four business lines.

Performance and Data Quality Ratings

Performance Ratings
Met
Our performance met our expectations
Mostly met
While the performance met most of our expectations some gaps exist
Not met
Significant gaps exist in performance and most or key expectations were not met

Data Quality Ratings
Good
Performance rating based on management judgment supported by an appropriate level of accurate information (including management estimates) obtained from reliable sources or methods
Reasonable
Performance rating based on management judgment supported, in most cases, by an appropriate level of accurate information (including management estimates) obtained from reliable sources or methods
Weak
Significant gaps in robustness of performance information; performance rating based on management judgment supported by entirely or predominantly qualitative information from informal sources or methods



Date modified:
2005-10-26